Close reading, teaching the conflicts: Reading reflectively in Korea

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

My most striking realization while teaching in a liberal arts college in Seoul has been the need to teach students close reading. The difficulty they find in performing detail-oriented textual analysis is, in part, a product of their prior literature training which is significantly inflected by colonial history. Their resistance to the method, moreover, can be traced to issues of neoliberalism and globalization, most concretely in the mismatch they perceive between "liberal learning" and the job market awaiting them. For students to determine for themselves the value of close reading, I argue, they need to be trained to reflect on their modes of reading. My most sustained effort in this regard has been a seminar called "Literature and Pedagogy," inspired by Gerald Graff's call for "teaching the conflicts." In focusing on the critical debates that have shaped the discipline of English, most students gain significant appreciation for the virtues of active and reflective learning while adopting a more critical stance vis-a-vis their prior literature learning and the university itself. Such a metacritical approach to English does not resolve the tensions impacting their educational lives, but it does give them the capacity to more critically and reflectively negotiate them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-154
Number of pages28
JournalAriel
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Korea
Close Reading
Teaching
Liberal Arts
Active Learning
Pedagogy
Colonial History
Reflective Learning
Mismatch
Art College
Stance
Textual Analysis
Education
Globalization
Neoliberalism
Seoul

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

@article{f177fdbe43f84607897431bcef6c1743,
title = "Close reading, teaching the conflicts: Reading reflectively in Korea",
abstract = "My most striking realization while teaching in a liberal arts college in Seoul has been the need to teach students close reading. The difficulty they find in performing detail-oriented textual analysis is, in part, a product of their prior literature training which is significantly inflected by colonial history. Their resistance to the method, moreover, can be traced to issues of neoliberalism and globalization, most concretely in the mismatch they perceive between {"}liberal learning{"} and the job market awaiting them. For students to determine for themselves the value of close reading, I argue, they need to be trained to reflect on their modes of reading. My most sustained effort in this regard has been a seminar called {"}Literature and Pedagogy,{"} inspired by Gerald Graff's call for {"}teaching the conflicts.{"} In focusing on the critical debates that have shaped the discipline of English, most students gain significant appreciation for the virtues of active and reflective learning while adopting a more critical stance vis-a-vis their prior literature learning and the university itself. Such a metacritical approach to English does not resolve the tensions impacting their educational lives, but it does give them the capacity to more critically and reflectively negotiate them.",
author = "Walsh, {Kelly S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/ari.2017.0017",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "127--154",
journal = "Ariel",
issn = "0004-1327",
publisher = "Datateam Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Close reading, teaching the conflicts : Reading reflectively in Korea. / Walsh, Kelly S.

In: Ariel, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 127-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Close reading, teaching the conflicts

T2 - Reading reflectively in Korea

AU - Walsh, Kelly S.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - My most striking realization while teaching in a liberal arts college in Seoul has been the need to teach students close reading. The difficulty they find in performing detail-oriented textual analysis is, in part, a product of their prior literature training which is significantly inflected by colonial history. Their resistance to the method, moreover, can be traced to issues of neoliberalism and globalization, most concretely in the mismatch they perceive between "liberal learning" and the job market awaiting them. For students to determine for themselves the value of close reading, I argue, they need to be trained to reflect on their modes of reading. My most sustained effort in this regard has been a seminar called "Literature and Pedagogy," inspired by Gerald Graff's call for "teaching the conflicts." In focusing on the critical debates that have shaped the discipline of English, most students gain significant appreciation for the virtues of active and reflective learning while adopting a more critical stance vis-a-vis their prior literature learning and the university itself. Such a metacritical approach to English does not resolve the tensions impacting their educational lives, but it does give them the capacity to more critically and reflectively negotiate them.

AB - My most striking realization while teaching in a liberal arts college in Seoul has been the need to teach students close reading. The difficulty they find in performing detail-oriented textual analysis is, in part, a product of their prior literature training which is significantly inflected by colonial history. Their resistance to the method, moreover, can be traced to issues of neoliberalism and globalization, most concretely in the mismatch they perceive between "liberal learning" and the job market awaiting them. For students to determine for themselves the value of close reading, I argue, they need to be trained to reflect on their modes of reading. My most sustained effort in this regard has been a seminar called "Literature and Pedagogy," inspired by Gerald Graff's call for "teaching the conflicts." In focusing on the critical debates that have shaped the discipline of English, most students gain significant appreciation for the virtues of active and reflective learning while adopting a more critical stance vis-a-vis their prior literature learning and the university itself. Such a metacritical approach to English does not resolve the tensions impacting their educational lives, but it does give them the capacity to more critically and reflectively negotiate them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018705629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018705629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/ari.2017.0017

DO - 10.1353/ari.2017.0017

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85018705629

VL - 48

SP - 127

EP - 154

JO - Ariel

JF - Ariel

SN - 0004-1327

IS - 2

ER -