Columnar cell lesions of the breast: Mammographic and US features

Min Jung Kim, Eun Kyung Kim, Ki Keun Oh, Byeong Woo Park, Haeryoung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Columnar cell lesions are being encountered with increasing frequency in breast biopsies performed. The purpose of our study was to determine whether columnar cell lesions of the breast have any distinctive imaging characteristics. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for all records of breast pathology obtained in a 17-month period. Columnar cell lesion was diagnosed in 53 lesions and 12 of these 53 lesions contained columnar cell lesions as the sole histopathologic findings. These 12 lesions in nine patients made up our study population. They included columnar cell change (n = 4), columnar cell hyperplasia (n = 5), and columnar cell hyperplasia with atypia (n = 3). Results: All nine patients underwent mammography and sonography within 1 month of each other. Of the mammograms in nine patients, nine lesions (75%) appeared as clustered amorphous or indistinct (n = 5), fine pleomorphic (n = 3), or round (n = 1) microcalcifications. The tenth lesion showed a focal mass without microcalcifications and the remaining two lesions showed no abnormal findings. At sonography, not-circumscribed masses were depicted in six lesions and microcalcifications were visible in four lesions, of which three lesions were concurrent with masses. There were no sonographically focal lesions in the remaining five. Overall 11 lesions were classified as BI-RADS category 4 (92%) and one as category 3. Of the three lesions with atypia, two were classified as category 4a and one was classified as category 4c, and they showed no distinct imaging appearance from those without atypia. Conclusion: Columnar cell lesions usually present as nonpalpable, clustered indeterminate or suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. They are indistinguishable from other causes of suspicious microcalcifications such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and require needle biopsy or excisional biopsy for diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)264-269
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Calcinosis
Breast
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Mammography
Hyperplasia
Ultrasonography
Biopsy
Needle Biopsy
Databases
Pathology
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{c056883cdbd74378b458d3141756f664,
title = "Columnar cell lesions of the breast: Mammographic and US features",
abstract = "Objectives: Columnar cell lesions are being encountered with increasing frequency in breast biopsies performed. The purpose of our study was to determine whether columnar cell lesions of the breast have any distinctive imaging characteristics. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for all records of breast pathology obtained in a 17-month period. Columnar cell lesion was diagnosed in 53 lesions and 12 of these 53 lesions contained columnar cell lesions as the sole histopathologic findings. These 12 lesions in nine patients made up our study population. They included columnar cell change (n = 4), columnar cell hyperplasia (n = 5), and columnar cell hyperplasia with atypia (n = 3). Results: All nine patients underwent mammography and sonography within 1 month of each other. Of the mammograms in nine patients, nine lesions (75{\%}) appeared as clustered amorphous or indistinct (n = 5), fine pleomorphic (n = 3), or round (n = 1) microcalcifications. The tenth lesion showed a focal mass without microcalcifications and the remaining two lesions showed no abnormal findings. At sonography, not-circumscribed masses were depicted in six lesions and microcalcifications were visible in four lesions, of which three lesions were concurrent with masses. There were no sonographically focal lesions in the remaining five. Overall 11 lesions were classified as BI-RADS category 4 (92{\%}) and one as category 3. Of the three lesions with atypia, two were classified as category 4a and one was classified as category 4c, and they showed no distinct imaging appearance from those without atypia. Conclusion: Columnar cell lesions usually present as nonpalpable, clustered indeterminate or suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. They are indistinguishable from other causes of suspicious microcalcifications such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and require needle biopsy or excisional biopsy for diagnosis.",
author = "Kim, {Min Jung} and Kim, {Eun Kyung} and Oh, {Ki Keun} and Park, {Byeong Woo} and Haeryoung Kim",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.013",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "264--269",
journal = "European Journal of Radiology",
issn = "0720-048X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Columnar cell lesions of the breast : Mammographic and US features. / Kim, Min Jung; Kim, Eun Kyung; Oh, Ki Keun; Park, Byeong Woo; Kim, Haeryoung.

In: European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.11.2006, p. 264-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Columnar cell lesions of the breast

T2 - Mammographic and US features

AU - Kim, Min Jung

AU - Kim, Eun Kyung

AU - Oh, Ki Keun

AU - Park, Byeong Woo

AU - Kim, Haeryoung

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Objectives: Columnar cell lesions are being encountered with increasing frequency in breast biopsies performed. The purpose of our study was to determine whether columnar cell lesions of the breast have any distinctive imaging characteristics. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for all records of breast pathology obtained in a 17-month period. Columnar cell lesion was diagnosed in 53 lesions and 12 of these 53 lesions contained columnar cell lesions as the sole histopathologic findings. These 12 lesions in nine patients made up our study population. They included columnar cell change (n = 4), columnar cell hyperplasia (n = 5), and columnar cell hyperplasia with atypia (n = 3). Results: All nine patients underwent mammography and sonography within 1 month of each other. Of the mammograms in nine patients, nine lesions (75%) appeared as clustered amorphous or indistinct (n = 5), fine pleomorphic (n = 3), or round (n = 1) microcalcifications. The tenth lesion showed a focal mass without microcalcifications and the remaining two lesions showed no abnormal findings. At sonography, not-circumscribed masses were depicted in six lesions and microcalcifications were visible in four lesions, of which three lesions were concurrent with masses. There were no sonographically focal lesions in the remaining five. Overall 11 lesions were classified as BI-RADS category 4 (92%) and one as category 3. Of the three lesions with atypia, two were classified as category 4a and one was classified as category 4c, and they showed no distinct imaging appearance from those without atypia. Conclusion: Columnar cell lesions usually present as nonpalpable, clustered indeterminate or suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. They are indistinguishable from other causes of suspicious microcalcifications such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and require needle biopsy or excisional biopsy for diagnosis.

AB - Objectives: Columnar cell lesions are being encountered with increasing frequency in breast biopsies performed. The purpose of our study was to determine whether columnar cell lesions of the breast have any distinctive imaging characteristics. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database for all records of breast pathology obtained in a 17-month period. Columnar cell lesion was diagnosed in 53 lesions and 12 of these 53 lesions contained columnar cell lesions as the sole histopathologic findings. These 12 lesions in nine patients made up our study population. They included columnar cell change (n = 4), columnar cell hyperplasia (n = 5), and columnar cell hyperplasia with atypia (n = 3). Results: All nine patients underwent mammography and sonography within 1 month of each other. Of the mammograms in nine patients, nine lesions (75%) appeared as clustered amorphous or indistinct (n = 5), fine pleomorphic (n = 3), or round (n = 1) microcalcifications. The tenth lesion showed a focal mass without microcalcifications and the remaining two lesions showed no abnormal findings. At sonography, not-circumscribed masses were depicted in six lesions and microcalcifications were visible in four lesions, of which three lesions were concurrent with masses. There were no sonographically focal lesions in the remaining five. Overall 11 lesions were classified as BI-RADS category 4 (92%) and one as category 3. Of the three lesions with atypia, two were classified as category 4a and one was classified as category 4c, and they showed no distinct imaging appearance from those without atypia. Conclusion: Columnar cell lesions usually present as nonpalpable, clustered indeterminate or suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. They are indistinguishable from other causes of suspicious microcalcifications such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and require needle biopsy or excisional biopsy for diagnosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750300146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750300146&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 16891081

AN - SCOPUS:33750300146

VL - 60

SP - 264

EP - 269

JO - European Journal of Radiology

JF - European Journal of Radiology

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 2

ER -