Comparative analysis of various interaction effects for piled rafts in sands using centrifuge tests

Dongyu Park, Jun Hwan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current study, the load responses and interaction effects of piled rafts embedded in sands were investigated. A series of centrifuge load tests were conducted using different types of model foundations. Single piles, group piles, piled rafts, and unpiled rafts were adopted in the tests to analyze various interaction effects of piled rafts. The load-settlement curves of piled rafts were similar to those of group piles for the initial settlement range and became similar to those of rafts as settlement increased. The pile-group, pile-to-raft, and raft-to-pile interaction factors showed state-dependent and nonlinear variations with settlement. Both pile-to-raft and raft-to-pile interaction factors decreased within the initial settlement range and increased with increasing settlement. The range of pile-to-raft interaction factor values was much larger than the range of values for the raft-to-pile interaction factor. The load response and load transfer relationship of piles for piled rafts were different from those of single piles, showing that the effect of raft-to-pile interaction was more dominant within the upper soil zone. The mobilized factor of safety for rafts was always higher than the safety factor of piles and piled rafts because of the lower mobilized load-carrying capacity of rafts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04014082
JournalJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume141
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Centrifuges
centrifuge
Piles
pile
Sand
sand
pile group
analysis
effect
test
safety
carrying capacity
Safety factor
Load limits

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

@article{bf8f8babefb449528293a0bd32bdc27e,
title = "Comparative analysis of various interaction effects for piled rafts in sands using centrifuge tests",
abstract = "In the current study, the load responses and interaction effects of piled rafts embedded in sands were investigated. A series of centrifuge load tests were conducted using different types of model foundations. Single piles, group piles, piled rafts, and unpiled rafts were adopted in the tests to analyze various interaction effects of piled rafts. The load-settlement curves of piled rafts were similar to those of group piles for the initial settlement range and became similar to those of rafts as settlement increased. The pile-group, pile-to-raft, and raft-to-pile interaction factors showed state-dependent and nonlinear variations with settlement. Both pile-to-raft and raft-to-pile interaction factors decreased within the initial settlement range and increased with increasing settlement. The range of pile-to-raft interaction factor values was much larger than the range of values for the raft-to-pile interaction factor. The load response and load transfer relationship of piles for piled rafts were different from those of single piles, showing that the effect of raft-to-pile interaction was more dominant within the upper soil zone. The mobilized factor of safety for rafts was always higher than the safety factor of piles and piled rafts because of the lower mobilized load-carrying capacity of rafts.",
author = "Dongyu Park and Lee, {Jun Hwan}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001183",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
journal = "Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "1090-0241",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of various interaction effects for piled rafts in sands using centrifuge tests

AU - Park, Dongyu

AU - Lee, Jun Hwan

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In the current study, the load responses and interaction effects of piled rafts embedded in sands were investigated. A series of centrifuge load tests were conducted using different types of model foundations. Single piles, group piles, piled rafts, and unpiled rafts were adopted in the tests to analyze various interaction effects of piled rafts. The load-settlement curves of piled rafts were similar to those of group piles for the initial settlement range and became similar to those of rafts as settlement increased. The pile-group, pile-to-raft, and raft-to-pile interaction factors showed state-dependent and nonlinear variations with settlement. Both pile-to-raft and raft-to-pile interaction factors decreased within the initial settlement range and increased with increasing settlement. The range of pile-to-raft interaction factor values was much larger than the range of values for the raft-to-pile interaction factor. The load response and load transfer relationship of piles for piled rafts were different from those of single piles, showing that the effect of raft-to-pile interaction was more dominant within the upper soil zone. The mobilized factor of safety for rafts was always higher than the safety factor of piles and piled rafts because of the lower mobilized load-carrying capacity of rafts.

AB - In the current study, the load responses and interaction effects of piled rafts embedded in sands were investigated. A series of centrifuge load tests were conducted using different types of model foundations. Single piles, group piles, piled rafts, and unpiled rafts were adopted in the tests to analyze various interaction effects of piled rafts. The load-settlement curves of piled rafts were similar to those of group piles for the initial settlement range and became similar to those of rafts as settlement increased. The pile-group, pile-to-raft, and raft-to-pile interaction factors showed state-dependent and nonlinear variations with settlement. Both pile-to-raft and raft-to-pile interaction factors decreased within the initial settlement range and increased with increasing settlement. The range of pile-to-raft interaction factor values was much larger than the range of values for the raft-to-pile interaction factor. The load response and load transfer relationship of piles for piled rafts were different from those of single piles, showing that the effect of raft-to-pile interaction was more dominant within the upper soil zone. The mobilized factor of safety for rafts was always higher than the safety factor of piles and piled rafts because of the lower mobilized load-carrying capacity of rafts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921396147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921396147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001183

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001183

M3 - Article

VL - 141

JO - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

SN - 1090-0241

IS - 1

M1 - 04014082

ER -