Comparative proteomics of pulmonary tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation

Nam Hoon Cho, Eun Suk Koh, Dong Wha Lee, Haeryoung Kim, Youn Pyo Choi, Sang Ho Cho, Dong Su Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


We aimed to evaluate neuroendocrine pulmonary tumors (NEPT) by a novel method involving map tree construction by comparing all of the protein spots. We performed a proteomics analysis to assess the similarities in protein expression between neuroendocrine pulmonary tumors (NEPT), including typical carcinoids (TC), atypical carcinoids (AC), large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) and small cell carcinomas (SCLC). Total protein lysates were obtained from seven histologically confirmed frozen NEPT tissues, including 1TC, 2 SCLC, and 4 cases ranging from AC to LCNEC. 2-DE demonstrated that TC was similar to normal lung. AC, LCNEC, and SCLC were similar to each other, forming a group separate from TC, however, SCLC at an early stage showed a similarity to TC. MALDI analysis detected 9 surrogate endpoint biomarkers, including elF5A1, GST M3, cytokeratin 18 (CK 18), FK506-binding protein p59, p63, MAGE-D2, mitochondrial short-chain enoyl-coenzyme A hydratase 1, tranferrin and poly (rC) binding protein 1. Immunohistochemical staining revealed a gradual decrease in expression rate of p63 and CK 18 with poor differentiation of NEPT. Our results demonstrate that (1) the comparative proteomics of NEPT match the WHO classification except for AC and LCNEC; (2) SCLC show differences in their proteomics according to tumor stage; and (3) CK 18 and p63 may be useful as diagnostically and prognostically available markers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)643-650
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Mar

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry
  • Chemistry(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative proteomics of pulmonary tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this