Abstract
Performance and implementation complexity between 2.4 GHz radar system with homodyne and 10 GHz radar system with super-heterodyne are compared and discussed. In particular, recently proposed architectures are examined, which are implemented by identical PLL and VCO. Both the operation of two different architectures and the superior performance of these radar systems can be understood by observing what level of signal is received based on same signal conditions. 10 GHz approach yields better performance in terms of RCS and antenna gain, but at the cost of increased implementation complexity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | European Microwave Week 2010, EuMW2010 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Connecting the World, Conference Proceedings - European Microwave Conference, EuMC 2010 |
| Pages | 501-504 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 Dec 17 |
| Event | 13th European Microwave Week 2010, EuMW2010: Connecting the World - 40th European Microwave Conference, EuMC 2010 - Paris, France Duration: 2010 Sep 28 → 2010 Sep 30 |
Other
| Other | 13th European Microwave Week 2010, EuMW2010: Connecting the World - 40th European Microwave Conference, EuMC 2010 |
|---|---|
| Country | France |
| City | Paris |
| Period | 10/9/28 → 10/9/30 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Radiation
Cite this
}
Comparative study of 2.4 GHz and 10 GHz vital signal sensing doppler radars. / An, Yong Jun; Hong, Young Pyo; Jang, Byung Jun; Yook, Jong Gwan.
European Microwave Week 2010, EuMW2010: Connecting the World, Conference Proceedings - European Microwave Conference, EuMC 2010. 2010. p. 501-504 5616507.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative study of 2.4 GHz and 10 GHz vital signal sensing doppler radars
AU - An, Yong Jun
AU - Hong, Young Pyo
AU - Jang, Byung Jun
AU - Yook, Jong Gwan
PY - 2010/12/17
Y1 - 2010/12/17
N2 - Performance and implementation complexity between 2.4 GHz radar system with homodyne and 10 GHz radar system with super-heterodyne are compared and discussed. In particular, recently proposed architectures are examined, which are implemented by identical PLL and VCO. Both the operation of two different architectures and the superior performance of these radar systems can be understood by observing what level of signal is received based on same signal conditions. 10 GHz approach yields better performance in terms of RCS and antenna gain, but at the cost of increased implementation complexity.
AB - Performance and implementation complexity between 2.4 GHz radar system with homodyne and 10 GHz radar system with super-heterodyne are compared and discussed. In particular, recently proposed architectures are examined, which are implemented by identical PLL and VCO. Both the operation of two different architectures and the superior performance of these radar systems can be understood by observing what level of signal is received based on same signal conditions. 10 GHz approach yields better performance in terms of RCS and antenna gain, but at the cost of increased implementation complexity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650057202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650057202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9782874870163
SP - 501
EP - 504
BT - European Microwave Week 2010, EuMW2010
ER -