Comparing endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal x-ray for gastric cancer screening in South Korea

A cost-utility analysis

Hoo Sun Chang, Euncheol Park, Woojin Chung, Chung Mo Nam, Kui Son Choi, Eun Cho, Woo Hyun Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are limited data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening using endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal x-ray in the general population. Objective: To evaluate the costeffectiveness of population-based screening for gastric cancer in South Korea by decision analysis. Methods: A time-dependent Markov model for gastric cancer was constructed for healthy adults 30 years of age and older, and a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Cost-utility analysis with multiple strategies was conducted to compare the costs and effects of 13 different screening alternatives with respect to the following eligibility criteria: age at the beginning of screening, screening interval, and screening method. The main outcome measurement was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The results revealed that annual endoscopic screening from ages 50-80 was the most cost-effective for the male population. In the females, biennial endoscopy screening from ages 50-80 was calculated as the most cost-effective strategy among the 12 screening alternatives. The most cost-effective screening strategy may be adjustable according to the screening costs and the distribution of cancer stage at screening. The limitation was that effectiveness data were obtained from published sources. Conclusions: Using the threshold of $19,162 per quality-adjusted life year on the basis of the Korean gross domestic product (2008), as suggested by the World Health Organization, endoscopic gastric cancer screening starting at the age of 50 years was highly cost-effective in the Korean population. The national recommendation for gastric cancer screening should consider the starting age of screening, the screening interval, and the screening modality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2721-2728
Number of pages8
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Republic of Korea
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Early Detection of Cancer
Stomach Neoplasms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
X-Rays
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population
Endoscopy
Gross Domestic Product
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Decision Support Techniques
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Chang, Hoo Sun ; Park, Euncheol ; Chung, Woojin ; Nam, Chung Mo ; Choi, Kui Son ; Cho, Eun ; Cho, Woo Hyun. / Comparing endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal x-ray for gastric cancer screening in South Korea : A cost-utility analysis. In: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 2721-2728.
@article{3f392de7b36e428f8593c040a4cb8a2a,
title = "Comparing endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal x-ray for gastric cancer screening in South Korea: A cost-utility analysis",
abstract = "Background: There are limited data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening using endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal x-ray in the general population. Objective: To evaluate the costeffectiveness of population-based screening for gastric cancer in South Korea by decision analysis. Methods: A time-dependent Markov model for gastric cancer was constructed for healthy adults 30 years of age and older, and a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Cost-utility analysis with multiple strategies was conducted to compare the costs and effects of 13 different screening alternatives with respect to the following eligibility criteria: age at the beginning of screening, screening interval, and screening method. The main outcome measurement was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The results revealed that annual endoscopic screening from ages 50-80 was the most cost-effective for the male population. In the females, biennial endoscopy screening from ages 50-80 was calculated as the most cost-effective strategy among the 12 screening alternatives. The most cost-effective screening strategy may be adjustable according to the screening costs and the distribution of cancer stage at screening. The limitation was that effectiveness data were obtained from published sources. Conclusions: Using the threshold of $19,162 per quality-adjusted life year on the basis of the Korean gross domestic product (2008), as suggested by the World Health Organization, endoscopic gastric cancer screening starting at the age of 50 years was highly cost-effective in the Korean population. The national recommendation for gastric cancer screening should consider the starting age of screening, the screening interval, and the screening modality.",
author = "Chang, {Hoo Sun} and Euncheol Park and Woojin Chung and Nam, {Chung Mo} and Choi, {Kui Son} and Eun Cho and Cho, {Woo Hyun}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2721",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "2721--2728",
journal = "Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention",
issn = "1513-7368",
publisher = "Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention",
number = "6",

}

Comparing endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal x-ray for gastric cancer screening in South Korea : A cost-utility analysis. / Chang, Hoo Sun; Park, Euncheol; Chung, Woojin; Nam, Chung Mo; Choi, Kui Son; Cho, Eun; Cho, Woo Hyun.

In: Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 6, 01.01.2012, p. 2721-2728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing endoscopy and upper gastrointestinal x-ray for gastric cancer screening in South Korea

T2 - A cost-utility analysis

AU - Chang, Hoo Sun

AU - Park, Euncheol

AU - Chung, Woojin

AU - Nam, Chung Mo

AU - Choi, Kui Son

AU - Cho, Eun

AU - Cho, Woo Hyun

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Background: There are limited data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening using endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal x-ray in the general population. Objective: To evaluate the costeffectiveness of population-based screening for gastric cancer in South Korea by decision analysis. Methods: A time-dependent Markov model for gastric cancer was constructed for healthy adults 30 years of age and older, and a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Cost-utility analysis with multiple strategies was conducted to compare the costs and effects of 13 different screening alternatives with respect to the following eligibility criteria: age at the beginning of screening, screening interval, and screening method. The main outcome measurement was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The results revealed that annual endoscopic screening from ages 50-80 was the most cost-effective for the male population. In the females, biennial endoscopy screening from ages 50-80 was calculated as the most cost-effective strategy among the 12 screening alternatives. The most cost-effective screening strategy may be adjustable according to the screening costs and the distribution of cancer stage at screening. The limitation was that effectiveness data were obtained from published sources. Conclusions: Using the threshold of $19,162 per quality-adjusted life year on the basis of the Korean gross domestic product (2008), as suggested by the World Health Organization, endoscopic gastric cancer screening starting at the age of 50 years was highly cost-effective in the Korean population. The national recommendation for gastric cancer screening should consider the starting age of screening, the screening interval, and the screening modality.

AB - Background: There are limited data evaluating the cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening using endoscopy or upper gastrointestinal x-ray in the general population. Objective: To evaluate the costeffectiveness of population-based screening for gastric cancer in South Korea by decision analysis. Methods: A time-dependent Markov model for gastric cancer was constructed for healthy adults 30 years of age and older, and a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. Cost-utility analysis with multiple strategies was conducted to compare the costs and effects of 13 different screening alternatives with respect to the following eligibility criteria: age at the beginning of screening, screening interval, and screening method. The main outcome measurement was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: The results revealed that annual endoscopic screening from ages 50-80 was the most cost-effective for the male population. In the females, biennial endoscopy screening from ages 50-80 was calculated as the most cost-effective strategy among the 12 screening alternatives. The most cost-effective screening strategy may be adjustable according to the screening costs and the distribution of cancer stage at screening. The limitation was that effectiveness data were obtained from published sources. Conclusions: Using the threshold of $19,162 per quality-adjusted life year on the basis of the Korean gross domestic product (2008), as suggested by the World Health Organization, endoscopic gastric cancer screening starting at the age of 50 years was highly cost-effective in the Korean population. The national recommendation for gastric cancer screening should consider the starting age of screening, the screening interval, and the screening modality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874069016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874069016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2721

DO - 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2721

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 2721

EP - 2728

JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

JF - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

SN - 1513-7368

IS - 6

ER -