Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP

Younguk Kim; Jinseong Jang; Taejoon Eo; Dosik Hwang

doi:10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP

Younguk Kim, Jinseong Jang, Taejoon Eo, Dosik Hwang

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper introduces a stereoscopy in Computed Tomography (CT), and two projection methods to create a stereoscopy. One is summing projection and the other is Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP). And then, comparison of stereoscopies using summing projection and MIP is presented. Numerical experiments from real CT data were performed for the comparison of the two techniques. Also Anaglyph 3D method is used to offer vivid 3D visualization effect to readers, and provides advantages and disadvantages of each method for conclusion.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)	9781479939428
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450
Publication status	Published - 2014 Sep 30
Event	13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia Duration: 2014 Jan 15 → 2014 Jan 18

Publication series

Name	13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings

Other

Other	13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014
Country	Malaysia
City	Kota Kinabalu
Period	14/1/15 → 14/1/18

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Control and Systems Engineering
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Kim, Y., Jang, J., Eo, T., & Hwang, D. (2014). Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP. In 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings [6914450] (13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

Kim, Younguk ; Jang, Jinseong ; Eo, Taejoon ; Hwang, Dosik. / Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography : Projection versus MIP. 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2014. (13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings).

@inproceedings{49022f2836ab47bc89000370caac5404,

title = "Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP",

abstract = "This paper introduces a stereoscopy in Computed Tomography (CT), and two projection methods to create a stereoscopy. One is summing projection and the other is Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP). And then, comparison of stereoscopies using summing projection and MIP is presented. Numerical experiments from real CT data were performed for the comparison of the two techniques. Also Anaglyph 3D method is used to offer vivid 3D visualization effect to readers, and provides advantages and disadvantages of each method for conclusion.",

author = "Younguk Kim and Jinseong Jang and Taejoon Eo and Dosik Hwang",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 IEEE. Copyright: Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 ; Conference date: 15-01-2014 Through 18-01-2014",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450",

language = "English",

series = "13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

booktitle = "13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings",

address = "United States",

}

Kim, Y, Jang, J, Eo, T & Hwang, D 2014, Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP. in 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings., 6914450, 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 14/1/15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography : Projection versus MIP. / Kim, Younguk; Jang, Jinseong; Eo, Taejoon; Hwang, Dosik.

13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2014. 6914450 (13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography

T2 - 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014

AU - Kim, Younguk

AU - Jang, Jinseong

AU - Eo, Taejoon

AU - Hwang, Dosik

PY - 2014/9/30

Y1 - 2014/9/30

N2 - This paper introduces a stereoscopy in Computed Tomography (CT), and two projection methods to create a stereoscopy. One is summing projection and the other is Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP). And then, comparison of stereoscopies using summing projection and MIP is presented. Numerical experiments from real CT data were performed for the comparison of the two techniques. Also Anaglyph 3D method is used to offer vivid 3D visualization effect to readers, and provides advantages and disadvantages of each method for conclusion.

AB - This paper introduces a stereoscopy in Computed Tomography (CT), and two projection methods to create a stereoscopy. One is summing projection and the other is Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP). And then, comparison of stereoscopies using summing projection and MIP is presented. Numerical experiments from real CT data were performed for the comparison of the two techniques. Also Anaglyph 3D method is used to offer vivid 3D visualization effect to readers, and provides advantages and disadvantages of each method for conclusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910090971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910090971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

DO - 10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84910090971

T3 - 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings

BT - 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Y2 - 15 January 2014 through 18 January 2014

ER -

Kim Y, Jang J, Eo T, Hwang D. Comparision study of stereoscopy in computed tomography: Projection versus MIP. In 13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2014. 6914450. (13th International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2014 - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1109/ELINFOCOM.2014.6914450