Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: A randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial

Chang Hyun Park, Hyung Keun Lee, Mee Kum Kim, Eun Chul Kim, Jae Yong Kim, Tae Im Kim, Hong Kyun Kim, Jong Suk Song, Kyung Chul Yoon, Do Hyung Lee, Tae Young Chung, Chul Young Choi, Hyun Seung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study is aim to compare the clinical effectiveness between the two most prominent dry eye disease (DED)-specific eye drops, 0.05% cyclosporine (CN) and 3% diquafosol (DQ). Methods: This is a multi-centered, randomized, masked, prospective clinical study. A total of 153 DED patients were randomly allocated to use CN twice per day or DQ six times daily. Cornea and conjunctival staining scores (NEI scale), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test scores, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were measured at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. Results: At 12 weeks after treatment, NEI scaled scores were significantly reduced from the baseline by - 6.60 for CN and - 6.63 for DQ group (all P < 0.0001, P = 0.9739 between groups). TBUT and Schirmer values for CN were significantly improved from the baseline at 4 and 12 weeks (P = 0.0034, P < 0.0001 for TBUT, P = 0.0418, P = 0.0031 for Schirmer test). However, for DQ, TBUT showed significant improvement at 12 weeks only (P = 0.0281). Mean OSDI score differences from the baseline to 12 weeks were improved by - 13.03 ± 19.63 for CN and - 16.11 ± 20.87 for DQ, respectively (all P < 0.0001, P = 0.854 between groups). Regarding drug compliance, the mean instillation frequency of CN was less than that of DQ (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in safety evaluation. Conclusions: The level of improvement regarding NEI, TBUT, and OSDI scores were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. However, with regards to the early improvement of TBUT and patient compliance, patients using CN improved faster and with greater adherence to drug usage than did those treated with DQ. Trial registration: KCT0002180, retrospectively registered on 23 December 2016.

Original languageEnglish
Article number131
JournalBMC Ophthalmology
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jun 17

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Taejoon Pharm (Seoul, Korea), which affords funding only, but has not any other contribution to our research.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: A randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this