Comparison of a 1,550nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser and a chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars

A simultaneous split-face trial

Jung Kim Hee, Gyun Kim Tae, Sook Kwon Yeon, Mo Park Jin, JuHee Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objective: Acne scarring is a common complication of acne but no effective single treatment modality has been developed. To compare the efficacy of 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and chemical reconstruction of skin scar (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars. Study Design/Materials and Methods: A split-face trial was conducted in 20 patients (10 rolling, 10 icepick types) with acne scars. One side was treated with the 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser three times with a 6-week interval. And the other side was treated with CROSS method two times every 12 weeks. Results: Significant improvement was observed in both sides of the face. In rolling type, the objective and subjective improvement rates were significantly higher in the sides treated with laser than CROSS method. However, in icepick type, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment sides. In the laser sides, grades of pain were significantly higher than that of treated with CROSS method. However, downtimes and lasting days of erythema were significantly longer in the sides treated with CROSS method. Conclusion: A 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and CROSS method are both well-tolerated and effective treatment options in the acne scars. However, there was a relatively small difference between the two treatment modalities. Therefore, dermatologists should consider the acne scar type to select the treatment options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545-549
Number of pages5
JournalLasers in Surgery and Medicine
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Erbium
Acne Vulgaris
Cicatrix
Glass
Lasers
Skin
Therapeutics
Erythema

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

@article{5162b1ecf98f4ddebcf7c743a3abf775,
title = "Comparison of a 1,550nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser and a chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars: A simultaneous split-face trial",
abstract = "Background and Objective: Acne scarring is a common complication of acne but no effective single treatment modality has been developed. To compare the efficacy of 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and chemical reconstruction of skin scar (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars. Study Design/Materials and Methods: A split-face trial was conducted in 20 patients (10 rolling, 10 icepick types) with acne scars. One side was treated with the 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser three times with a 6-week interval. And the other side was treated with CROSS method two times every 12 weeks. Results: Significant improvement was observed in both sides of the face. In rolling type, the objective and subjective improvement rates were significantly higher in the sides treated with laser than CROSS method. However, in icepick type, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment sides. In the laser sides, grades of pain were significantly higher than that of treated with CROSS method. However, downtimes and lasting days of erythema were significantly longer in the sides treated with CROSS method. Conclusion: A 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and CROSS method are both well-tolerated and effective treatment options in the acne scars. However, there was a relatively small difference between the two treatment modalities. Therefore, dermatologists should consider the acne scar type to select the treatment options.",
author = "Hee, {Jung Kim} and Tae, {Gyun Kim} and Yeon, {Sook Kwon} and Jin, {Mo Park} and JuHee Lee",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lsm.20796",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "545--549",
journal = "Lasers in Surgery and Medicine",
issn = "0196-8092",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

Comparison of a 1,550nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser and a chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars : A simultaneous split-face trial. / Hee, Jung Kim; Tae, Gyun Kim; Yeon, Sook Kwon; Jin, Mo Park; Lee, JuHee.

In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Vol. 41, No. 8, 01.10.2009, p. 545-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of a 1,550nm Erbium:Glass fractional laser and a chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars

T2 - A simultaneous split-face trial

AU - Hee, Jung Kim

AU - Tae, Gyun Kim

AU - Yeon, Sook Kwon

AU - Jin, Mo Park

AU - Lee, JuHee

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Background and Objective: Acne scarring is a common complication of acne but no effective single treatment modality has been developed. To compare the efficacy of 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and chemical reconstruction of skin scar (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars. Study Design/Materials and Methods: A split-face trial was conducted in 20 patients (10 rolling, 10 icepick types) with acne scars. One side was treated with the 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser three times with a 6-week interval. And the other side was treated with CROSS method two times every 12 weeks. Results: Significant improvement was observed in both sides of the face. In rolling type, the objective and subjective improvement rates were significantly higher in the sides treated with laser than CROSS method. However, in icepick type, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment sides. In the laser sides, grades of pain were significantly higher than that of treated with CROSS method. However, downtimes and lasting days of erythema were significantly longer in the sides treated with CROSS method. Conclusion: A 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and CROSS method are both well-tolerated and effective treatment options in the acne scars. However, there was a relatively small difference between the two treatment modalities. Therefore, dermatologists should consider the acne scar type to select the treatment options.

AB - Background and Objective: Acne scarring is a common complication of acne but no effective single treatment modality has been developed. To compare the efficacy of 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and chemical reconstruction of skin scar (CROSS) method in the treatment of acne scars. Study Design/Materials and Methods: A split-face trial was conducted in 20 patients (10 rolling, 10 icepick types) with acne scars. One side was treated with the 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser three times with a 6-week interval. And the other side was treated with CROSS method two times every 12 weeks. Results: Significant improvement was observed in both sides of the face. In rolling type, the objective and subjective improvement rates were significantly higher in the sides treated with laser than CROSS method. However, in icepick type, there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment sides. In the laser sides, grades of pain were significantly higher than that of treated with CROSS method. However, downtimes and lasting days of erythema were significantly longer in the sides treated with CROSS method. Conclusion: A 1,550nm Er:Glass fractional laser and CROSS method are both well-tolerated and effective treatment options in the acne scars. However, there was a relatively small difference between the two treatment modalities. Therefore, dermatologists should consider the acne scar type to select the treatment options.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349644857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349644857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lsm.20796

DO - 10.1002/lsm.20796

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 545

EP - 549

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 8

ER -