TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes between rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon angioplasty followed by radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis
AU - Lee, Seung Whan
AU - Park, Seong Wook
AU - Hong, Myeong Ki
AU - Kim, Young Hak
AU - Han, Ki Hoon
AU - Moon, Dae Hyuk
AU - Oh, Seung Jun
AU - Lee, Cheol Whan
AU - Kim, Jae Joong
AU - Park, Seung Jung
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) have been shown to effectively dilate in-stent restenosis (ISR). It is not known, however, which of these technique, when followed by β-radiation, is more effective. Therefore, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing RA and CBA before β-radiation therapy for diffuse ISR. Methods: Patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to receive RA (group 1, n = 58) or CBA (group 2, n = 55) before β-radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, with the radiation dose being 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months, and the secondary end point was major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death, target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. Results: The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Mean lesion length was 21.0 ± 11.2 mm in group 1 and 20.8 ± 10.2 mm in group 2 (P = .77). Radiation was delivered successfully to all patients. We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 90 patients (80%). The rates of angiographic restenosis were 14.9% (7 of 47) in group 1 and 14.0% (6 of 43) in group 2 (P = .89). No patient experienced myocardial infarction or death during the 9-month follow-up period. Rates of target lesion revascularization or major adverse cardiac events were 3.4% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (P = .94) during the 9-month follow-up. Conclusions: Either RA or CBA, followed by β-radiation using a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine- filled balloon, is equally safe and effective for diffuse ISR in 6-month angiographic and 9-month clinical outcomes.
AB - Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) have been shown to effectively dilate in-stent restenosis (ISR). It is not known, however, which of these technique, when followed by β-radiation, is more effective. Therefore, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing RA and CBA before β-radiation therapy for diffuse ISR. Methods: Patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to receive RA (group 1, n = 58) or CBA (group 2, n = 55) before β-radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, with the radiation dose being 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months, and the secondary end point was major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death, target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. Results: The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Mean lesion length was 21.0 ± 11.2 mm in group 1 and 20.8 ± 10.2 mm in group 2 (P = .77). Radiation was delivered successfully to all patients. We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 90 patients (80%). The rates of angiographic restenosis were 14.9% (7 of 47) in group 1 and 14.0% (6 of 43) in group 2 (P = .89). No patient experienced myocardial infarction or death during the 9-month follow-up period. Rates of target lesion revascularization or major adverse cardiac events were 3.4% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (P = .94) during the 9-month follow-up. Conclusions: Either RA or CBA, followed by β-radiation using a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine- filled balloon, is equally safe and effective for diffuse ISR in 6-month angiographic and 9-month clinical outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944444303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24944444303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 16169344
AN - SCOPUS:24944444303
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 150
SP - 577
EP - 582
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 3
ER -