Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism

Ikhyun Jun, David Sung Yong Kang, Jerry Tan, Jin Young Choi, Woon Heo, Joo Young Kim, Min Goo Lee, Eungkweon Kim, KyoungYul Seo, Tae-im Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refractive errors, and aberrations, between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in eyes with myopic astigmatism. Setting Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. Design Retrospective comparative case series. Methods Patients with myopic astigmatism were treated with aberration-free transepithelial PRK or corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK using a 1050 Hz high-repetition excimer laser. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results The study comprised 188 patients (188 eyes); 91 eyes had aberration-free transepithelial PRK and 97 eyes corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK. Six month after surgery, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable (−0.06 logMAR ± 0.07 [SD] aberration-free group; −0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR wavefront-guided group). The safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes were also comparable between groups. Corneal total root-mean-square (RMS) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased after treatment in both groups, although fewer RMS HOAs were induced in the corneal wavefront-guided group than in the aberration-free group. Spherical aberration increased similarly after treatment in both groups. However, coma and trefoil increased only in the aberration-free group. Conclusions Aberration-free transepithelial PRK and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK were safe and effective for correction of myopic astigmatism without difference in visual acuity and refractive outcomes. However, the corneal wavefront-guided profile induced fewer corneal aberrations than the aberration-free profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-182
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Photorefractive Keratectomy
Astigmatism
Visual Acuity
Safety
Excimer Lasers
Republic of Korea
Refractive Errors
Coma
Medicine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

@article{4c12e2caa46a4b00b751bee8082102e5,
title = "Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refractive errors, and aberrations, between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in eyes with myopic astigmatism. Setting Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. Design Retrospective comparative case series. Methods Patients with myopic astigmatism were treated with aberration-free transepithelial PRK or corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK using a 1050 Hz high-repetition excimer laser. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results The study comprised 188 patients (188 eyes); 91 eyes had aberration-free transepithelial PRK and 97 eyes corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK. Six month after surgery, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable (−0.06 logMAR ± 0.07 [SD] aberration-free group; −0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR wavefront-guided group). The safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes were also comparable between groups. Corneal total root-mean-square (RMS) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased after treatment in both groups, although fewer RMS HOAs were induced in the corneal wavefront-guided group than in the aberration-free group. Spherical aberration increased similarly after treatment in both groups. However, coma and trefoil increased only in the aberration-free group. Conclusions Aberration-free transepithelial PRK and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK were safe and effective for correction of myopic astigmatism without difference in visual acuity and refractive outcomes. However, the corneal wavefront-guided profile induced fewer corneal aberrations than the aberration-free profile.",
author = "Ikhyun Jun and Kang, {David Sung Yong} and Jerry Tan and Choi, {Jin Young} and Woon Heo and Kim, {Joo Young} and Lee, {Min Goo} and Eungkweon Kim and KyoungYul Seo and Tae-im Kim",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.045",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "174--182",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism. / Jun, Ikhyun; Kang, David Sung Yong; Tan, Jerry; Choi, Jin Young; Heo, Woon; Kim, Joo Young; Lee, Min Goo; Kim, Eungkweon; Seo, KyoungYul; Kim, Tae-im.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 174-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism

AU - Jun, Ikhyun

AU - Kang, David Sung Yong

AU - Tan, Jerry

AU - Choi, Jin Young

AU - Heo, Woon

AU - Kim, Joo Young

AU - Lee, Min Goo

AU - Kim, Eungkweon

AU - Seo, KyoungYul

AU - Kim, Tae-im

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Purpose To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refractive errors, and aberrations, between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in eyes with myopic astigmatism. Setting Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. Design Retrospective comparative case series. Methods Patients with myopic astigmatism were treated with aberration-free transepithelial PRK or corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK using a 1050 Hz high-repetition excimer laser. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results The study comprised 188 patients (188 eyes); 91 eyes had aberration-free transepithelial PRK and 97 eyes corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK. Six month after surgery, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable (−0.06 logMAR ± 0.07 [SD] aberration-free group; −0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR wavefront-guided group). The safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes were also comparable between groups. Corneal total root-mean-square (RMS) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased after treatment in both groups, although fewer RMS HOAs were induced in the corneal wavefront-guided group than in the aberration-free group. Spherical aberration increased similarly after treatment in both groups. However, coma and trefoil increased only in the aberration-free group. Conclusions Aberration-free transepithelial PRK and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK were safe and effective for correction of myopic astigmatism without difference in visual acuity and refractive outcomes. However, the corneal wavefront-guided profile induced fewer corneal aberrations than the aberration-free profile.

AB - Purpose To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refractive errors, and aberrations, between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in eyes with myopic astigmatism. Setting Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. Design Retrospective comparative case series. Methods Patients with myopic astigmatism were treated with aberration-free transepithelial PRK or corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK using a 1050 Hz high-repetition excimer laser. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results The study comprised 188 patients (188 eyes); 91 eyes had aberration-free transepithelial PRK and 97 eyes corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK. Six month after surgery, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable (−0.06 logMAR ± 0.07 [SD] aberration-free group; −0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR wavefront-guided group). The safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes were also comparable between groups. Corneal total root-mean-square (RMS) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased after treatment in both groups, although fewer RMS HOAs were induced in the corneal wavefront-guided group than in the aberration-free group. Spherical aberration increased similarly after treatment in both groups. However, coma and trefoil increased only in the aberration-free group. Conclusions Aberration-free transepithelial PRK and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK were safe and effective for correction of myopic astigmatism without difference in visual acuity and refractive outcomes. However, the corneal wavefront-guided profile induced fewer corneal aberrations than the aberration-free profile.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016455361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016455361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.045

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.045

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 174

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 2

ER -