Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning

Ying Wan, Tate Jackson, Chooryung Judi Chung, Fei Gao, George Blakey, Tung Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of virtual surgical planning (VSP) on the accuracy of condylar seating in surgical cases involving Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). An additional aim was to quantify differences between actual surgical outcome and planned virtual outcome. Setting and sample population: A private practice in Charlotte North Carolina. Twenty-five consecutively operated subjects prepared with VSP and twenty consecutively subjects operated with conventional surgery planning were enrolled. Material and Methods: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before surgery (T1) and post-surgery after splint removal (T2). The T1 and T2 CBCTs were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using voxel-based registration. Three dimensional (3D) models were built and oriented to a 3D Frankfurt horizontal. Displacement of corresponding condylar landmarks was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the VSP and conventional group in the magnitude of translation or rotation of the condyles following surgery. VSP surgical outcomes differed significantly from predicted positions at all landmarks. Virtual surgical planning does not prevent changes to condylar position as a result of surgery. Actual surgical results differed significantly from VSP-predicted outcomes. Conclusions: Virtual surgical planning did not reduce the changes to condylar position and angulation that resulted from conventionally planned orthognathic surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-148
Number of pages7
JournalOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Volume22
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 May 1

Fingerprint

Orthognathic Surgery
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Splints
Private Practice
Skull Base
Osteotomy
Bone and Bones
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthodontics
  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{1249c6405d2c4617951209dcb2c74324,
title = "Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the effect of virtual surgical planning (VSP) on the accuracy of condylar seating in surgical cases involving Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). An additional aim was to quantify differences between actual surgical outcome and planned virtual outcome. Setting and sample population: A private practice in Charlotte North Carolina. Twenty-five consecutively operated subjects prepared with VSP and twenty consecutively subjects operated with conventional surgery planning were enrolled. Material and Methods: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before surgery (T1) and post-surgery after splint removal (T2). The T1 and T2 CBCTs were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using voxel-based registration. Three dimensional (3D) models were built and oriented to a 3D Frankfurt horizontal. Displacement of corresponding condylar landmarks was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the VSP and conventional group in the magnitude of translation or rotation of the condyles following surgery. VSP surgical outcomes differed significantly from predicted positions at all landmarks. Virtual surgical planning does not prevent changes to condylar position as a result of surgery. Actual surgical results differed significantly from VSP-predicted outcomes. Conclusions: Virtual surgical planning did not reduce the changes to condylar position and angulation that resulted from conventionally planned orthognathic surgery.",
author = "Ying Wan and Tate Jackson and Chung, {Chooryung Judi} and Fei Gao and George Blakey and Tung Nguyen",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ocr.12262",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "142--148",
journal = "Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research",
issn = "1601-6335",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "S1",

}

Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning. / Wan, Ying; Jackson, Tate; Chung, Chooryung Judi; Gao, Fei; Blakey, George; Nguyen, Tung.

In: Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, Vol. 22, No. S1, 01.05.2019, p. 142-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of condylar position in orthognathic surgery cases treated with virtual surgical planning vs. conventional model planning

AU - Wan, Ying

AU - Jackson, Tate

AU - Chung, Chooryung Judi

AU - Gao, Fei

AU - Blakey, George

AU - Nguyen, Tung

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess the effect of virtual surgical planning (VSP) on the accuracy of condylar seating in surgical cases involving Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). An additional aim was to quantify differences between actual surgical outcome and planned virtual outcome. Setting and sample population: A private practice in Charlotte North Carolina. Twenty-five consecutively operated subjects prepared with VSP and twenty consecutively subjects operated with conventional surgery planning were enrolled. Material and Methods: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before surgery (T1) and post-surgery after splint removal (T2). The T1 and T2 CBCTs were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using voxel-based registration. Three dimensional (3D) models were built and oriented to a 3D Frankfurt horizontal. Displacement of corresponding condylar landmarks was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the VSP and conventional group in the magnitude of translation or rotation of the condyles following surgery. VSP surgical outcomes differed significantly from predicted positions at all landmarks. Virtual surgical planning does not prevent changes to condylar position as a result of surgery. Actual surgical results differed significantly from VSP-predicted outcomes. Conclusions: Virtual surgical planning did not reduce the changes to condylar position and angulation that resulted from conventionally planned orthognathic surgery.

AB - Objectives: To assess the effect of virtual surgical planning (VSP) on the accuracy of condylar seating in surgical cases involving Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO). An additional aim was to quantify differences between actual surgical outcome and planned virtual outcome. Setting and sample population: A private practice in Charlotte North Carolina. Twenty-five consecutively operated subjects prepared with VSP and twenty consecutively subjects operated with conventional surgery planning were enrolled. Material and Methods: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained before surgery (T1) and post-surgery after splint removal (T2). The T1 and T2 CBCTs were superimposed on the anterior cranial base using voxel-based registration. Three dimensional (3D) models were built and oriented to a 3D Frankfurt horizontal. Displacement of corresponding condylar landmarks was measured. Results: No significant difference was found between the VSP and conventional group in the magnitude of translation or rotation of the condyles following surgery. VSP surgical outcomes differed significantly from predicted positions at all landmarks. Virtual surgical planning does not prevent changes to condylar position as a result of surgery. Actual surgical results differed significantly from VSP-predicted outcomes. Conclusions: Virtual surgical planning did not reduce the changes to condylar position and angulation that resulted from conventionally planned orthognathic surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065489708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065489708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ocr.12262

DO - 10.1111/ocr.12262

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 142

EP - 148

JO - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

JF - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

SN - 1601-6335

IS - S1

ER -