Comparison of environmental flows from a habitat suitability perspective

A case study in the Naeseong-cheon Stream in Korea

Seung Ki Kim, Sung-Uk Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Environmental flow is the amount of water flow required to maintain the health of a river ecosystem. Environmental flow includes both optimal flow and minimum flow. The former is the amount of flow that guarantees the complete function of a stream ecosystem, whereas the latter is the amount of flow below which the stability and health of a stream ecosystem cannot be maintained. This study attempts to compare environmental flows computed by various environmental flow methodologies, including hydrological methods, hydraulic rating methods, and habitat simulation methods. For the habitat simulation method, physical habitat simulations were carried out using habitat suitability curves for Zacco platypus. The study site is a 20-km-long reach of the Naeseong-cheon Stream downstream from the Youngju Dam in Korea. The Naeseong-cheon Stream is a moderately sized stream (order 8) with a normal flow of 4.1 m3/s. It was found that environmental flows vary greatly depending on the selection of methodologies. Specifically, the minimum flows by the hydrological methods were significantly smaller than those by the hydraulic rating methods or the habitat simulation methods, and the optimal flow by the hydraulic rating method is much larger than those by the other two methods. Physical habitat simulations for various minimum flows revealed that the minimum flow by the hydrological methods might fail to provide the minimum requirement for an aquatic habitat.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2119
JournalEcohydrology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Korean Peninsula
case studies
habitat
habitats
methodology
fluid mechanics
simulation
comparison
hydraulics
ecosystems
ecosystem
Zacco platypus
method
physical method
dams (hydrology)
aquatic habitat
water flow
dam

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

@article{e3ff5c106bcd477eb67070a2cc6bf0fe,
title = "Comparison of environmental flows from a habitat suitability perspective: A case study in the Naeseong-cheon Stream in Korea",
abstract = "Environmental flow is the amount of water flow required to maintain the health of a river ecosystem. Environmental flow includes both optimal flow and minimum flow. The former is the amount of flow that guarantees the complete function of a stream ecosystem, whereas the latter is the amount of flow below which the stability and health of a stream ecosystem cannot be maintained. This study attempts to compare environmental flows computed by various environmental flow methodologies, including hydrological methods, hydraulic rating methods, and habitat simulation methods. For the habitat simulation method, physical habitat simulations were carried out using habitat suitability curves for Zacco platypus. The study site is a 20-km-long reach of the Naeseong-cheon Stream downstream from the Youngju Dam in Korea. The Naeseong-cheon Stream is a moderately sized stream (order 8) with a normal flow of 4.1 m3/s. It was found that environmental flows vary greatly depending on the selection of methodologies. Specifically, the minimum flows by the hydrological methods were significantly smaller than those by the hydraulic rating methods or the habitat simulation methods, and the optimal flow by the hydraulic rating method is much larger than those by the other two methods. Physical habitat simulations for various minimum flows revealed that the minimum flow by the hydrological methods might fail to provide the minimum requirement for an aquatic habitat.",
author = "Kim, {Seung Ki} and Sung-Uk Choi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/eco.2119",
language = "English",
journal = "Ecohydrology",
issn = "1936-0584",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of environmental flows from a habitat suitability perspective

T2 - A case study in the Naeseong-cheon Stream in Korea

AU - Kim, Seung Ki

AU - Choi, Sung-Uk

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Environmental flow is the amount of water flow required to maintain the health of a river ecosystem. Environmental flow includes both optimal flow and minimum flow. The former is the amount of flow that guarantees the complete function of a stream ecosystem, whereas the latter is the amount of flow below which the stability and health of a stream ecosystem cannot be maintained. This study attempts to compare environmental flows computed by various environmental flow methodologies, including hydrological methods, hydraulic rating methods, and habitat simulation methods. For the habitat simulation method, physical habitat simulations were carried out using habitat suitability curves for Zacco platypus. The study site is a 20-km-long reach of the Naeseong-cheon Stream downstream from the Youngju Dam in Korea. The Naeseong-cheon Stream is a moderately sized stream (order 8) with a normal flow of 4.1 m3/s. It was found that environmental flows vary greatly depending on the selection of methodologies. Specifically, the minimum flows by the hydrological methods were significantly smaller than those by the hydraulic rating methods or the habitat simulation methods, and the optimal flow by the hydraulic rating method is much larger than those by the other two methods. Physical habitat simulations for various minimum flows revealed that the minimum flow by the hydrological methods might fail to provide the minimum requirement for an aquatic habitat.

AB - Environmental flow is the amount of water flow required to maintain the health of a river ecosystem. Environmental flow includes both optimal flow and minimum flow. The former is the amount of flow that guarantees the complete function of a stream ecosystem, whereas the latter is the amount of flow below which the stability and health of a stream ecosystem cannot be maintained. This study attempts to compare environmental flows computed by various environmental flow methodologies, including hydrological methods, hydraulic rating methods, and habitat simulation methods. For the habitat simulation method, physical habitat simulations were carried out using habitat suitability curves for Zacco platypus. The study site is a 20-km-long reach of the Naeseong-cheon Stream downstream from the Youngju Dam in Korea. The Naeseong-cheon Stream is a moderately sized stream (order 8) with a normal flow of 4.1 m3/s. It was found that environmental flows vary greatly depending on the selection of methodologies. Specifically, the minimum flows by the hydrological methods were significantly smaller than those by the hydraulic rating methods or the habitat simulation methods, and the optimal flow by the hydraulic rating method is much larger than those by the other two methods. Physical habitat simulations for various minimum flows revealed that the minimum flow by the hydrological methods might fail to provide the minimum requirement for an aquatic habitat.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067887593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067887593&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/eco.2119

DO - 10.1002/eco.2119

M3 - Article

JO - Ecohydrology

JF - Ecohydrology

SN - 1936-0584

M1 - e2119

ER -