Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images

Ji Hyun Youk, Inkyung Jung, Jung Hyun Yoon, Sung Hun Kim, You Me Kim, Eun Hye Lee, Sun Hye Jeong, minjung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast ultrasound of static and video images. Ninety-nine breast masses visible on ultrasound examination from 95 women 19–81 y of age at five institutions were enrolled in this study. They were scheduled to undergo biopsy or surgery or had been stable for at least 2 y of ultrasound follow-up after benign biopsy results or typically benign findings. For each mass, representative long- and short-axis static ultrasound images were acquired; real-time long- and short-axis B-mode video images through the mass area were separately saved as cine clips. Each image was reviewed independently by five radiologists who were asked to classify ultrasound features according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Inter-observer variability was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics. Diagnostic performance on static and video images was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. No significant difference was found in κ values between static and video images for all descriptors, although κ values of video images were higher than those of static images for shape, orientation, margin and calcifications. After receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the video images (0.83, range: 0.77–0.87) had higher areas under the curve than the static images (0.80, range: 0.75–0.83; p = 0.08). Inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of video images was similar to that of static images on breast ultrasonography according to the new edition of BI-RADS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2083-2088
Number of pages6
JournalUltrasound in Medicine and Biology
Volume42
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
data systems
Information Systems
breast
Breast
ROC Curve
Mammary Ultrasonography
Biopsy
Surgical Instruments
Area Under Curve
curves
receivers
clips
calcification
surgery
margins
examination
statistics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Biophysics
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Youk, Ji Hyun ; Jung, Inkyung ; Yoon, Jung Hyun ; Kim, Sung Hun ; Kim, You Me ; Lee, Eun Hye ; Jeong, Sun Hye ; Kim, minjung. / Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images. In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 9. pp. 2083-2088.
@article{4adba9930a364c1fac6b4a772ca84bee,
title = "Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images",
abstract = "Our aim was to compare the inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast ultrasound of static and video images. Ninety-nine breast masses visible on ultrasound examination from 95 women 19–81 y of age at five institutions were enrolled in this study. They were scheduled to undergo biopsy or surgery or had been stable for at least 2 y of ultrasound follow-up after benign biopsy results or typically benign findings. For each mass, representative long- and short-axis static ultrasound images were acquired; real-time long- and short-axis B-mode video images through the mass area were separately saved as cine clips. Each image was reviewed independently by five radiologists who were asked to classify ultrasound features according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Inter-observer variability was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics. Diagnostic performance on static and video images was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. No significant difference was found in κ values between static and video images for all descriptors, although κ values of video images were higher than those of static images for shape, orientation, margin and calcifications. After receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the video images (0.83, range: 0.77–0.87) had higher areas under the curve than the static images (0.80, range: 0.75–0.83; p = 0.08). Inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of video images was similar to that of static images on breast ultrasonography according to the new edition of BI-RADS.",
author = "Youk, {Ji Hyun} and Inkyung Jung and Yoon, {Jung Hyun} and Kim, {Sung Hun} and Kim, {You Me} and Lee, {Eun Hye} and Jeong, {Sun Hye} and minjung Kim",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "2083--2088",
journal = "Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology",
issn = "0301-5629",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images. / Youk, Ji Hyun; Jung, Inkyung; Yoon, Jung Hyun; Kim, Sung Hun; Kim, You Me; Lee, Eun Hye; Jeong, Sun Hye; Kim, minjung.

In: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 42, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 2083-2088.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images

AU - Youk, Ji Hyun

AU - Jung, Inkyung

AU - Yoon, Jung Hyun

AU - Kim, Sung Hun

AU - Kim, You Me

AU - Lee, Eun Hye

AU - Jeong, Sun Hye

AU - Kim, minjung

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Our aim was to compare the inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast ultrasound of static and video images. Ninety-nine breast masses visible on ultrasound examination from 95 women 19–81 y of age at five institutions were enrolled in this study. They were scheduled to undergo biopsy or surgery or had been stable for at least 2 y of ultrasound follow-up after benign biopsy results or typically benign findings. For each mass, representative long- and short-axis static ultrasound images were acquired; real-time long- and short-axis B-mode video images through the mass area were separately saved as cine clips. Each image was reviewed independently by five radiologists who were asked to classify ultrasound features according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Inter-observer variability was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics. Diagnostic performance on static and video images was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. No significant difference was found in κ values between static and video images for all descriptors, although κ values of video images were higher than those of static images for shape, orientation, margin and calcifications. After receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the video images (0.83, range: 0.77–0.87) had higher areas under the curve than the static images (0.80, range: 0.75–0.83; p = 0.08). Inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of video images was similar to that of static images on breast ultrasonography according to the new edition of BI-RADS.

AB - Our aim was to compare the inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast ultrasound of static and video images. Ninety-nine breast masses visible on ultrasound examination from 95 women 19–81 y of age at five institutions were enrolled in this study. They were scheduled to undergo biopsy or surgery or had been stable for at least 2 y of ultrasound follow-up after benign biopsy results or typically benign findings. For each mass, representative long- and short-axis static ultrasound images were acquired; real-time long- and short-axis B-mode video images through the mass area were separately saved as cine clips. Each image was reviewed independently by five radiologists who were asked to classify ultrasound features according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon. Inter-observer variability was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics. Diagnostic performance on static and video images was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. No significant difference was found in κ values between static and video images for all descriptors, although κ values of video images were higher than those of static images for shape, orientation, margin and calcifications. After receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the video images (0.83, range: 0.77–0.87) had higher areas under the curve than the static images (0.80, range: 0.75–0.83; p = 0.08). Inter-observer variability and diagnostic performance of video images was similar to that of static images on breast ultrasonography according to the new edition of BI-RADS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977578959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977578959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 2083

EP - 2088

JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

SN - 0301-5629

IS - 9

ER -