Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma

Na Rae Kim, Samin Hong, Ji Hyun Kim, Seung Soo Rho, Gong Je Seong, chanyun kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare perimacular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Participants, consecutively enrolled from January 2009 to June 2009, underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging with RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters, and GCC parameters were acquired. Mean measurements of ONH, RNFL, and GCC parameters among the normal, NTG, and POAG groups were compared using analysis of variance. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of each parameter to detect glaucomatous changes. Results: Fifty-eight normal controls, 51 patients with NTG, and 52 patients with POAG were included. Mean measurements of ONH parameters were similar between the NTG and POAG groups (all P>0.05). Average RNFL thickness did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.053), whereas average GCC thickness significantly differed between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.001). In terms of pattern-based parameters of GCC, focal loss volume did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.165), whereas global loss volume was significantly higher in the POAG group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RNFL and GCC measurements with respect to the ability to detect glaucomatous changes. Conclusions: GCC loss in the NTG group was more localized compared with diffuse GCC loss in the POAG group. Perimacular GCC parameters could be a good alternative or supplement to peripapillary RNFL measurements for diagnosis and research in patients with NTG.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-139
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Low Tension Glaucoma
Ganglia
Nerve Fibers
Optic Disk
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Kim, Na Rae ; Hong, Samin ; Kim, Ji Hyun ; Rho, Seung Soo ; Seong, Gong Je ; kim, chanyun. / Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. In: Journal of Glaucoma. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 133-139.
@article{d41476dd370e458cbdd2d28b6fbad3ef,
title = "Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare perimacular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Participants, consecutively enrolled from January 2009 to June 2009, underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging with RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters, and GCC parameters were acquired. Mean measurements of ONH, RNFL, and GCC parameters among the normal, NTG, and POAG groups were compared using analysis of variance. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of each parameter to detect glaucomatous changes. Results: Fifty-eight normal controls, 51 patients with NTG, and 52 patients with POAG were included. Mean measurements of ONH parameters were similar between the NTG and POAG groups (all P>0.05). Average RNFL thickness did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.053), whereas average GCC thickness significantly differed between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.001). In terms of pattern-based parameters of GCC, focal loss volume did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.165), whereas global loss volume was significantly higher in the POAG group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RNFL and GCC measurements with respect to the ability to detect glaucomatous changes. Conclusions: GCC loss in the NTG group was more localized compared with diffuse GCC loss in the POAG group. Perimacular GCC parameters could be a good alternative or supplement to peripapillary RNFL measurements for diagnosis and research in patients with NTG.",
author = "Kim, {Na Rae} and Samin Hong and Kim, {Ji Hyun} and Rho, {Seung Soo} and Seong, {Gong Je} and chanyun kim",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254cde",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "133--139",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. / Kim, Na Rae; Hong, Samin; Kim, Ji Hyun; Rho, Seung Soo; Seong, Gong Je; kim, chanyun.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 133-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma

AU - Kim, Na Rae

AU - Hong, Samin

AU - Kim, Ji Hyun

AU - Rho, Seung Soo

AU - Seong, Gong Je

AU - kim, chanyun

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare perimacular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Participants, consecutively enrolled from January 2009 to June 2009, underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging with RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters, and GCC parameters were acquired. Mean measurements of ONH, RNFL, and GCC parameters among the normal, NTG, and POAG groups were compared using analysis of variance. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of each parameter to detect glaucomatous changes. Results: Fifty-eight normal controls, 51 patients with NTG, and 52 patients with POAG were included. Mean measurements of ONH parameters were similar between the NTG and POAG groups (all P>0.05). Average RNFL thickness did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.053), whereas average GCC thickness significantly differed between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.001). In terms of pattern-based parameters of GCC, focal loss volume did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.165), whereas global loss volume was significantly higher in the POAG group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RNFL and GCC measurements with respect to the ability to detect glaucomatous changes. Conclusions: GCC loss in the NTG group was more localized compared with diffuse GCC loss in the POAG group. Perimacular GCC parameters could be a good alternative or supplement to peripapillary RNFL measurements for diagnosis and research in patients with NTG.

AB - Purpose: To compare perimacular ganglion cell complex (GCC) parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Participants, consecutively enrolled from January 2009 to June 2009, underwent optical coherence tomographic imaging with RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Optic nerve head (ONH) parameters, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) parameters, and GCC parameters were acquired. Mean measurements of ONH, RNFL, and GCC parameters among the normal, NTG, and POAG groups were compared using analysis of variance. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the ability of each parameter to detect glaucomatous changes. Results: Fifty-eight normal controls, 51 patients with NTG, and 52 patients with POAG were included. Mean measurements of ONH parameters were similar between the NTG and POAG groups (all P>0.05). Average RNFL thickness did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.053), whereas average GCC thickness significantly differed between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.001). In terms of pattern-based parameters of GCC, focal loss volume did not differ between the NTG and POAG groups (P=0.165), whereas global loss volume was significantly higher in the POAG group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RNFL and GCC measurements with respect to the ability to detect glaucomatous changes. Conclusions: GCC loss in the NTG group was more localized compared with diffuse GCC loss in the POAG group. Perimacular GCC parameters could be a good alternative or supplement to peripapillary RNFL measurements for diagnosis and research in patients with NTG.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879159525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879159525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254cde

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182254cde

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 133

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 2

ER -