Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment

Ho Joong Kim, seonghwan moon, Heoung Jae Chun, Kyoung Tak Kang, Hak Sun Kim, Eun Su Moon, Jin Oh Park, Byung Yoon Hwang, Hwan Mo Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the difference in motion profiles between instrumented and non-instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine.. Method: In vivo retrospective radiological analysis of dynamic (flexion-extension) lateral plain films was performed in different lumbar spine fusion types. Twenty-eight patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery at the L4/5 level. Fourteen patients underwent anterior fusion surgery without implantation, and the others underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Segmental angular motion was measured at the fused and adjacent levels using dynamic plain lateral film 2 years after operation. Results: The anterior uninstrumented fusion group showed mean 2.0° of segmental angular motion at the fused level compared with mean of 0.8° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). In contrast, at the proximal adjacent level, decreased angular motion (mean 7.7°) was noted in the anterior uninstrumented fusion group compared with mean 11.6° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that differing stiffness of fusion segments could cause different mechanical motion profiles at adjacent segments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical and Investigative Medicine
Volume32
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Spine
Motion Pictures

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kim, Ho Joong ; moon, seonghwan ; Chun, Heoung Jae ; Kang, Kyoung Tak ; Kim, Hak Sun ; Moon, Eun Su ; Park, Jin Oh ; Hwang, Byung Yoon ; Lee, Hwan Mo. / Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment. In: Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 32, No. 1.
@article{448a437d2ca34c9c92eb03ae27cc4dca,
title = "Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the difference in motion profiles between instrumented and non-instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine.. Method: In vivo retrospective radiological analysis of dynamic (flexion-extension) lateral plain films was performed in different lumbar spine fusion types. Twenty-eight patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery at the L4/5 level. Fourteen patients underwent anterior fusion surgery without implantation, and the others underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Segmental angular motion was measured at the fused and adjacent levels using dynamic plain lateral film 2 years after operation. Results: The anterior uninstrumented fusion group showed mean 2.0° of segmental angular motion at the fused level compared with mean of 0.8° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). In contrast, at the proximal adjacent level, decreased angular motion (mean 7.7°) was noted in the anterior uninstrumented fusion group compared with mean 11.6° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that differing stiffness of fusion segments could cause different mechanical motion profiles at adjacent segments.",
author = "Kim, {Ho Joong} and seonghwan moon and Chun, {Heoung Jae} and Kang, {Kyoung Tak} and Kim, {Hak Sun} and Moon, {Eun Su} and Park, {Jin Oh} and Hwang, {Byung Yoon} and Lee, {Hwan Mo}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "Clinical and Investigative Medicine",
issn = "0147-958X",
publisher = "The Canadian Society for Clinical Investigation",
number = "1",

}

Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment. / Kim, Ho Joong; moon, seonghwan; Chun, Heoung Jae; Kang, Kyoung Tak; Kim, Hak Sun; Moon, Eun Su; Park, Jin Oh; Hwang, Byung Yoon; Lee, Hwan Mo.

In: Clinical and Investigative Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.02.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment

AU - Kim, Ho Joong

AU - moon, seonghwan

AU - Chun, Heoung Jae

AU - Kang, Kyoung Tak

AU - Kim, Hak Sun

AU - Moon, Eun Su

AU - Park, Jin Oh

AU - Hwang, Byung Yoon

AU - Lee, Hwan Mo

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the difference in motion profiles between instrumented and non-instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine.. Method: In vivo retrospective radiological analysis of dynamic (flexion-extension) lateral plain films was performed in different lumbar spine fusion types. Twenty-eight patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery at the L4/5 level. Fourteen patients underwent anterior fusion surgery without implantation, and the others underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Segmental angular motion was measured at the fused and adjacent levels using dynamic plain lateral film 2 years after operation. Results: The anterior uninstrumented fusion group showed mean 2.0° of segmental angular motion at the fused level compared with mean of 0.8° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). In contrast, at the proximal adjacent level, decreased angular motion (mean 7.7°) was noted in the anterior uninstrumented fusion group compared with mean 11.6° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that differing stiffness of fusion segments could cause different mechanical motion profiles at adjacent segments.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the difference in motion profiles between instrumented and non-instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine.. Method: In vivo retrospective radiological analysis of dynamic (flexion-extension) lateral plain films was performed in different lumbar spine fusion types. Twenty-eight patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery at the L4/5 level. Fourteen patients underwent anterior fusion surgery without implantation, and the others underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Segmental angular motion was measured at the fused and adjacent levels using dynamic plain lateral film 2 years after operation. Results: The anterior uninstrumented fusion group showed mean 2.0° of segmental angular motion at the fused level compared with mean of 0.8° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). In contrast, at the proximal adjacent level, decreased angular motion (mean 7.7°) was noted in the anterior uninstrumented fusion group compared with mean 11.6° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that differing stiffness of fusion segments could cause different mechanical motion profiles at adjacent segments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59649110306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59649110306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19178881

AN - SCOPUS:59649110306

VL - 32

JO - Clinical and Investigative Medicine

JF - Clinical and Investigative Medicine

SN - 0147-958X

IS - 1

ER -