Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR and PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay for the direct and rapid detection of bacteria and antibiotic resistance determinants in positive culture bottles

Hye Young Wang, Seoyong Kim, Jungho Kim, Soon Deok Park, Hyo Youl Kim, Young Uh, Hyeyoung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay and a PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA) for the rapid detection of bacteria and identification of antibiotic resistance genes directly from blood culture bottles and to compare the results of these molecular assays with conventional culture methods. The molecular diagnostic methods were used to evaluate 593 blood culture bottles from patients with bloodstream infections. The detection positivity of multiplex real-time PCR assay for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida spp. was equivalent to PCR-REBA as 99.6 %, 99.1 % and 100 %, respectively. Using conventional bacterial cultures as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these two molecular methods were 99.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.980–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.983–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % and 99 %, respectively. However, positivity of the Real-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiplex real-time PCR assay targeting the mecA gene to detect methicillin resistance was lower than that of the PCR-REBA method, detecting an overall positivity of 98.4 % (n=182; 95 % CI, 0.964–1.000; P<0.009) and 99.5 % (n=184; 95 % CI, 0.985–1.000; P<0.0001), respectively. The entire two methods take about 3 h, while results from culture can take up to 48–72 h. Therefore, the use of these two molecular methods was rapid and reliable for the characterization of causative pathogens in bloodstream infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)962-974
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Medical Microbiology
Volume65
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Microbial Drug Resistance
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Bacteria
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Confidence Intervals
Methicillin Resistance
Gene Targeting
Molecular Pathology
Gram-Positive Bacteria
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Infection
Gram-Negative Bacteria
Candida
Sensitivity and Specificity
Genes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

@article{0cda3e2f06c74ca98f32b1a4bbab083d,
title = "Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR and PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay for the direct and rapid detection of bacteria and antibiotic resistance determinants in positive culture bottles",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay and a PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA) for the rapid detection of bacteria and identification of antibiotic resistance genes directly from blood culture bottles and to compare the results of these molecular assays with conventional culture methods. The molecular diagnostic methods were used to evaluate 593 blood culture bottles from patients with bloodstream infections. The detection positivity of multiplex real-time PCR assay for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida spp. was equivalent to PCR-REBA as 99.6 {\%}, 99.1 {\%} and 100 {\%}, respectively. Using conventional bacterial cultures as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these two molecular methods were 99.5 {\%} [95 {\%} confidence interval (CI), 0.980–1.000; P<0.001), 100 {\%} (95 {\%} CI, 0.983–1.000; P<0.001), 100 {\%} and 99 {\%}, respectively. However, positivity of the Real-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiplex real-time PCR assay targeting the mecA gene to detect methicillin resistance was lower than that of the PCR-REBA method, detecting an overall positivity of 98.4 {\%} (n=182; 95 {\%} CI, 0.964–1.000; P<0.009) and 99.5 {\%} (n=184; 95 {\%} CI, 0.985–1.000; P<0.0001), respectively. The entire two methods take about 3 h, while results from culture can take up to 48–72 h. Therefore, the use of these two molecular methods was rapid and reliable for the characterization of causative pathogens in bloodstream infections.",
author = "Wang, {Hye Young} and Seoyong Kim and Jungho Kim and Park, {Soon Deok} and Kim, {Hyo Youl} and Young Uh and Hyeyoung Lee",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1099/jmm.0.000319",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "962--974",
journal = "Journal of Medical Microbiology",
issn = "0022-2615",
publisher = "Society for General Microbiology",
number = "9",

}

Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR and PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay for the direct and rapid detection of bacteria and antibiotic resistance determinants in positive culture bottles. / Wang, Hye Young; Kim, Seoyong; Kim, Jungho; Park, Soon Deok; Kim, Hyo Youl; Uh, Young; Lee, Hyeyoung.

In: Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol. 65, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 962-974.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of multiplex real-time PCR and PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay for the direct and rapid detection of bacteria and antibiotic resistance determinants in positive culture bottles

AU - Wang, Hye Young

AU - Kim, Seoyong

AU - Kim, Jungho

AU - Park, Soon Deok

AU - Kim, Hyo Youl

AU - Uh, Young

AU - Lee, Hyeyoung

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay and a PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA) for the rapid detection of bacteria and identification of antibiotic resistance genes directly from blood culture bottles and to compare the results of these molecular assays with conventional culture methods. The molecular diagnostic methods were used to evaluate 593 blood culture bottles from patients with bloodstream infections. The detection positivity of multiplex real-time PCR assay for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida spp. was equivalent to PCR-REBA as 99.6 %, 99.1 % and 100 %, respectively. Using conventional bacterial cultures as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these two molecular methods were 99.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.980–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.983–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % and 99 %, respectively. However, positivity of the Real-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiplex real-time PCR assay targeting the mecA gene to detect methicillin resistance was lower than that of the PCR-REBA method, detecting an overall positivity of 98.4 % (n=182; 95 % CI, 0.964–1.000; P<0.009) and 99.5 % (n=184; 95 % CI, 0.985–1.000; P<0.0001), respectively. The entire two methods take about 3 h, while results from culture can take up to 48–72 h. Therefore, the use of these two molecular methods was rapid and reliable for the characterization of causative pathogens in bloodstream infections.

AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay and a PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA) for the rapid detection of bacteria and identification of antibiotic resistance genes directly from blood culture bottles and to compare the results of these molecular assays with conventional culture methods. The molecular diagnostic methods were used to evaluate 593 blood culture bottles from patients with bloodstream infections. The detection positivity of multiplex real-time PCR assay for Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and Candida spp. was equivalent to PCR-REBA as 99.6 %, 99.1 % and 100 %, respectively. Using conventional bacterial cultures as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of these two molecular methods were 99.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.980–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % (95 % CI, 0.983–1.000; P<0.001), 100 % and 99 %, respectively. However, positivity of the Real-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiplex real-time PCR assay targeting the mecA gene to detect methicillin resistance was lower than that of the PCR-REBA method, detecting an overall positivity of 98.4 % (n=182; 95 % CI, 0.964–1.000; P<0.009) and 99.5 % (n=184; 95 % CI, 0.985–1.000; P<0.0001), respectively. The entire two methods take about 3 h, while results from culture can take up to 48–72 h. Therefore, the use of these two molecular methods was rapid and reliable for the characterization of causative pathogens in bloodstream infections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989847529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989847529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1099/jmm.0.000319

DO - 10.1099/jmm.0.000319

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 962

EP - 974

JO - Journal of Medical Microbiology

JF - Journal of Medical Microbiology

SN - 0022-2615

IS - 9

ER -