Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy without benzodiazepine and propofol sedation: Starting at the bottom or the top

Jae Hee Cho, Jie-Hyun Kim, Yongchan Lee, Si Young Song, SangKil Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: Same-day bidirectional endoscopy including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy is routinely performed to evaluate anemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as to conduct cancer surveillance. Numerous questions have been raised regarding the most appropriate procedural sequence and the resulting potential procedure interactions. We compared the quality and feasibility of performing EGD and colonoscopy without sedation in patients subjected to EGD-colonoscopy (Group I) or colonoscopy-EGD (Group II) sequences. Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (40:40). All EGD examinations were recorded on videotape, and the quality of 18 EGD steps was assessed by three endoscopists. In addition, we analyzed the colonoscopic parameters and subjective discomfort scores of patients. Results: Group I displayed significantly superior quality for retroflexion-related steps (P11-13; all median of Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P < 0.01), visualization of the angular fold (P10; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.048), and general assessment of the stomach (P17; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.008) and upper GI tract (P15; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.047). Colonoscopic insertion time, total time, and prolonged insertion ratio did not differ between the two groups. Questionnaire responses indicated that EGD was perceived to be more stressful in Group II sequence. Conclusions: The quality of EGD steps is influenced by the sequence of bidirectional endoscopy. EGD is perceived to be more stressful to patients when preceded by colonoscopy. Therefore, EGD followed by colonoscopy may be the preferable procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)899-904
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Digestive System Endoscopy
Propofol
Benzodiazepines
Endoscopy
Colonoscopy
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Videotape Recording
Anemia
Stomach
Hemorrhage

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{190743acf8544aa38dda235a3be75aa9,
title = "Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy without benzodiazepine and propofol sedation: Starting at the bottom or the top",
abstract = "Background and Study Aims: Same-day bidirectional endoscopy including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy is routinely performed to evaluate anemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as to conduct cancer surveillance. Numerous questions have been raised regarding the most appropriate procedural sequence and the resulting potential procedure interactions. We compared the quality and feasibility of performing EGD and colonoscopy without sedation in patients subjected to EGD-colonoscopy (Group I) or colonoscopy-EGD (Group II) sequences. Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (40:40). All EGD examinations were recorded on videotape, and the quality of 18 EGD steps was assessed by three endoscopists. In addition, we analyzed the colonoscopic parameters and subjective discomfort scores of patients. Results: Group I displayed significantly superior quality for retroflexion-related steps (P11-13; all median of Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P < 0.01), visualization of the angular fold (P10; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.048), and general assessment of the stomach (P17; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.008) and upper GI tract (P15; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.047). Colonoscopic insertion time, total time, and prolonged insertion ratio did not differ between the two groups. Questionnaire responses indicated that EGD was perceived to be more stressful in Group II sequence. Conclusions: The quality of EGD steps is influenced by the sequence of bidirectional endoscopy. EGD is perceived to be more stressful to patients when preceded by colonoscopy. Therefore, EGD followed by colonoscopy may be the preferable procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy.",
author = "Cho, {Jae Hee} and Jie-Hyun Kim and Yongchan Lee and Song, {Si Young} and SangKil Lee",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06157.x",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "899--904",
journal = "Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)",
issn = "0815-9319",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy without benzodiazepine and propofol sedation

T2 - Starting at the bottom or the top

AU - Cho, Jae Hee

AU - Kim, Jie-Hyun

AU - Lee, Yongchan

AU - Song, Si Young

AU - Lee, SangKil

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Background and Study Aims: Same-day bidirectional endoscopy including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy is routinely performed to evaluate anemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as to conduct cancer surveillance. Numerous questions have been raised regarding the most appropriate procedural sequence and the resulting potential procedure interactions. We compared the quality and feasibility of performing EGD and colonoscopy without sedation in patients subjected to EGD-colonoscopy (Group I) or colonoscopy-EGD (Group II) sequences. Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (40:40). All EGD examinations were recorded on videotape, and the quality of 18 EGD steps was assessed by three endoscopists. In addition, we analyzed the colonoscopic parameters and subjective discomfort scores of patients. Results: Group I displayed significantly superior quality for retroflexion-related steps (P11-13; all median of Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P < 0.01), visualization of the angular fold (P10; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.048), and general assessment of the stomach (P17; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.008) and upper GI tract (P15; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.047). Colonoscopic insertion time, total time, and prolonged insertion ratio did not differ between the two groups. Questionnaire responses indicated that EGD was perceived to be more stressful in Group II sequence. Conclusions: The quality of EGD steps is influenced by the sequence of bidirectional endoscopy. EGD is perceived to be more stressful to patients when preceded by colonoscopy. Therefore, EGD followed by colonoscopy may be the preferable procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy.

AB - Background and Study Aims: Same-day bidirectional endoscopy including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy is routinely performed to evaluate anemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as to conduct cancer surveillance. Numerous questions have been raised regarding the most appropriate procedural sequence and the resulting potential procedure interactions. We compared the quality and feasibility of performing EGD and colonoscopy without sedation in patients subjected to EGD-colonoscopy (Group I) or colonoscopy-EGD (Group II) sequences. Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (40:40). All EGD examinations were recorded on videotape, and the quality of 18 EGD steps was assessed by three endoscopists. In addition, we analyzed the colonoscopic parameters and subjective discomfort scores of patients. Results: Group I displayed significantly superior quality for retroflexion-related steps (P11-13; all median of Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P < 0.01), visualization of the angular fold (P10; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.048), and general assessment of the stomach (P17; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.008) and upper GI tract (P15; Group I vs Group II = 2:3; P = 0.047). Colonoscopic insertion time, total time, and prolonged insertion ratio did not differ between the two groups. Questionnaire responses indicated that EGD was perceived to be more stressful in Group II sequence. Conclusions: The quality of EGD steps is influenced by the sequence of bidirectional endoscopy. EGD is perceived to be more stressful to patients when preceded by colonoscopy. Therefore, EGD followed by colonoscopy may be the preferable procedural sequence for same-day bidirectional endoscopy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951738727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951738727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06157.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06157.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20546443

AN - SCOPUS:77951738727

VL - 25

SP - 899

EP - 904

JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

SN - 0815-9319

IS - 5

ER -