Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study

Hyun Joo Shin, Myung Joon Kim, Ha Yan Kim, Yun Ho Roh, MiJung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate consistency in shear wave velocities (SWVs) on ultrasound elastography using different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Methods: The SWVs were measured using an elasticity phantom with a Young’s modulus of 16.9 kPa, with three recently introduced ultrasound elastography machines (A, B and C from different vendors) and two transducers (low and high frequencies) at four depths (2, 3, 4 and 5 cm). Mean SWVs from 15 measurements and coefficient of variations (CVs) were compared between three machines, two transducers and four acquisition depths. Results: The SWVs using the high frequency transducer were not acquired at 5 cm depth in machine B, and a high frequency transducer was not available in machine C. The mean SWVs in the three machines were different (p ≤ 0.002). The CVs were 0–0.09 in three machines. The mean SWVs between the two transducers were different (p < 0.001) except at 4 and 5 cm depths in machine A. The SWVs were affected by the acquisition depths in all conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is considerable difference in SWVs on ultrasound elastography depending on different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Caution is needed when using the cutoff values of SWVs in different conditions. Key Points: • The shear wave velocities (SWVs) are different between different ultrasound elastography machines • The SWVs are also different between different transducers and acquisition depths • Caution is needed when using the cutoff SWVs measured under different conditions

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3361-3367
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Transducers
Elastic Modulus
Elasticity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{acb4810ef96f44ff933ea47f3ec2cde5,
title = "Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate consistency in shear wave velocities (SWVs) on ultrasound elastography using different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Methods: The SWVs were measured using an elasticity phantom with a Young’s modulus of 16.9 kPa, with three recently introduced ultrasound elastography machines (A, B and C from different vendors) and two transducers (low and high frequencies) at four depths (2, 3, 4 and 5 cm). Mean SWVs from 15 measurements and coefficient of variations (CVs) were compared between three machines, two transducers and four acquisition depths. Results: The SWVs using the high frequency transducer were not acquired at 5 cm depth in machine B, and a high frequency transducer was not available in machine C. The mean SWVs in the three machines were different (p ≤ 0.002). The CVs were 0–0.09 in three machines. The mean SWVs between the two transducers were different (p < 0.001) except at 4 and 5 cm depths in machine A. The SWVs were affected by the acquisition depths in all conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is considerable difference in SWVs on ultrasound elastography depending on different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Caution is needed when using the cutoff values of SWVs in different conditions. Key Points: • The shear wave velocities (SWVs) are different between different ultrasound elastography machines • The SWVs are also different between different transducers and acquisition depths • Caution is needed when using the cutoff SWVs measured under different conditions",
author = "Shin, {Hyun Joo} and Kim, {Myung Joon} and Kim, {Ha Yan} and Roh, {Yun Ho} and MiJung Lee",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-016-4212-y",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "3361--3367",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths : a phantom study. / Shin, Hyun Joo; Kim, Myung Joon; Kim, Ha Yan; Roh, Yun Ho; Lee, MiJung.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 26, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 3361-3367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths

T2 - a phantom study

AU - Shin, Hyun Joo

AU - Kim, Myung Joon

AU - Kim, Ha Yan

AU - Roh, Yun Ho

AU - Lee, MiJung

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objectives: To investigate consistency in shear wave velocities (SWVs) on ultrasound elastography using different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Methods: The SWVs were measured using an elasticity phantom with a Young’s modulus of 16.9 kPa, with three recently introduced ultrasound elastography machines (A, B and C from different vendors) and two transducers (low and high frequencies) at four depths (2, 3, 4 and 5 cm). Mean SWVs from 15 measurements and coefficient of variations (CVs) were compared between three machines, two transducers and four acquisition depths. Results: The SWVs using the high frequency transducer were not acquired at 5 cm depth in machine B, and a high frequency transducer was not available in machine C. The mean SWVs in the three machines were different (p ≤ 0.002). The CVs were 0–0.09 in three machines. The mean SWVs between the two transducers were different (p < 0.001) except at 4 and 5 cm depths in machine A. The SWVs were affected by the acquisition depths in all conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is considerable difference in SWVs on ultrasound elastography depending on different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Caution is needed when using the cutoff values of SWVs in different conditions. Key Points: • The shear wave velocities (SWVs) are different between different ultrasound elastography machines • The SWVs are also different between different transducers and acquisition depths • Caution is needed when using the cutoff SWVs measured under different conditions

AB - Objectives: To investigate consistency in shear wave velocities (SWVs) on ultrasound elastography using different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Methods: The SWVs were measured using an elasticity phantom with a Young’s modulus of 16.9 kPa, with three recently introduced ultrasound elastography machines (A, B and C from different vendors) and two transducers (low and high frequencies) at four depths (2, 3, 4 and 5 cm). Mean SWVs from 15 measurements and coefficient of variations (CVs) were compared between three machines, two transducers and four acquisition depths. Results: The SWVs using the high frequency transducer were not acquired at 5 cm depth in machine B, and a high frequency transducer was not available in machine C. The mean SWVs in the three machines were different (p ≤ 0.002). The CVs were 0–0.09 in three machines. The mean SWVs between the two transducers were different (p < 0.001) except at 4 and 5 cm depths in machine A. The SWVs were affected by the acquisition depths in all conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is considerable difference in SWVs on ultrasound elastography depending on different machines, transducers and acquisition depths. Caution is needed when using the cutoff values of SWVs in different conditions. Key Points: • The shear wave velocities (SWVs) are different between different ultrasound elastography machines • The SWVs are also different between different transducers and acquisition depths • Caution is needed when using the cutoff SWVs measured under different conditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955573216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955573216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-016-4212-y

DO - 10.1007/s00330-016-4212-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 26815368

AN - SCOPUS:84955573216

VL - 26

SP - 3361

EP - 3367

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 10

ER -