Comparison of six-month results of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Myeongki Hong, Seong Wook Park, Jae Joong Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Seung Jung Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare results of delayed elective stent implantation on the infarct-related artery with conventional balloon angioplasty in 97 patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset (stenting in 45 patients, balloon angioplasty in 52 patients). In selected patients, intracoronary stent implantation on the infarct-related artery at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction is safe, feasible, and may reduce the the frequency of late restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty (the angiographic restenosis rate: 13% in patients with stents vs 52% in patients with balloon angioplasty, p <0.05).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1524-1527
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume79
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Balloon Angioplasty
Myocardial Infarction
Stents
Arteries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Hong, Myeongki ; Park, Seong Wook ; Kim, Jae Joong ; Lee, Cheol Whan ; Park, Seung Jung. / Comparison of six-month results of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 1997 ; Vol. 79, No. 11. pp. 1524-1527.
@article{a73326faf29e4449949d166035c75736,
title = "Comparison of six-month results of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare results of delayed elective stent implantation on the infarct-related artery with conventional balloon angioplasty in 97 patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset (stenting in 45 patients, balloon angioplasty in 52 patients). In selected patients, intracoronary stent implantation on the infarct-related artery at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction is safe, feasible, and may reduce the the frequency of late restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty (the angiographic restenosis rate: 13{\%} in patients with stents vs 52{\%} in patients with balloon angioplasty, p <0.05).",
author = "Myeongki Hong and Park, {Seong Wook} and Kim, {Jae Joong} and Lee, {Cheol Whan} and Park, {Seung Jung}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00185-9",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1524--1527",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Comparison of six-month results of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction. / Hong, Myeongki; Park, Seong Wook; Kim, Jae Joong; Lee, Cheol Whan; Park, Seung Jung.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 79, No. 11, 01.06.1997, p. 1524-1527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of six-month results of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction

AU - Hong, Myeongki

AU - Park, Seong Wook

AU - Kim, Jae Joong

AU - Lee, Cheol Whan

AU - Park, Seung Jung

PY - 1997/6/1

Y1 - 1997/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare results of delayed elective stent implantation on the infarct-related artery with conventional balloon angioplasty in 97 patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset (stenting in 45 patients, balloon angioplasty in 52 patients). In selected patients, intracoronary stent implantation on the infarct-related artery at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction is safe, feasible, and may reduce the the frequency of late restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty (the angiographic restenosis rate: 13% in patients with stents vs 52% in patients with balloon angioplasty, p <0.05).

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare results of delayed elective stent implantation on the infarct-related artery with conventional balloon angioplasty in 97 patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset (stenting in 45 patients, balloon angioplasty in 52 patients). In selected patients, intracoronary stent implantation on the infarct-related artery at 7 to 10 days after symptom onset of acute myocardial infarction is safe, feasible, and may reduce the the frequency of late restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty (the angiographic restenosis rate: 13% in patients with stents vs 52% in patients with balloon angioplasty, p <0.05).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030906411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030906411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00185-9

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00185-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 9185647

AN - SCOPUS:0030906411

VL - 79

SP - 1524

EP - 1527

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 11

ER -