Comparison of the effects of bilateral and unilateral training after stroke: A meta-analysis

Yejin Lee, Moonyoung Kim, Ji Hyuk Park, Hae Yean Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential effects of bilateral and unilateral training on upper extremity (UE) function remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral training on UE function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion by two reviewers after searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and KoreaMed. Methodological qualities were assessed using the PEDro scale. Effect size was estimated by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs of sufficient quality were included in our meta-analysis. The effect size on UE capacity was statistically significant in favor of the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) groups (SMD [fixed], g:-0.34; 95 CI:-0.59-0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 0). No other SMDs were significant. CONCLUSION: The CIMT tasks were more effective than bilateral training with regard to increased UE capacity; however, this result should be cautiously interpreted since the evaluation tools were designed for assessment of unilateral UE function, not bilateral UE function. Further, the effect of the CIMT tasks on UE capacity was not translated into ADL. Considering the disadvantages of CIMT such as fatigue, bilateral training may be more appropriate for improving ADL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-313
Number of pages13
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Meta-Analysis
Stroke
Activities of Daily Living
Randomized Controlled Trials
Group Psychotherapy
MEDLINE
Fatigue
Therapeutics
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Lee, Yejin ; Kim, Moonyoung ; Park, Ji Hyuk ; Park, Hae Yean. / Comparison of the effects of bilateral and unilateral training after stroke : A meta-analysis. In: NeuroRehabilitation. 2017 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 301-313.
@article{bcda122e00624e3f88977631441f8c5e,
title = "Comparison of the effects of bilateral and unilateral training after stroke: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The differential effects of bilateral and unilateral training on upper extremity (UE) function remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral training on UE function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion by two reviewers after searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and KoreaMed. Methodological qualities were assessed using the PEDro scale. Effect size was estimated by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs of sufficient quality were included in our meta-analysis. The effect size on UE capacity was statistically significant in favor of the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) groups (SMD [fixed], g:-0.34; 95 CI:-0.59-0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 0). No other SMDs were significant. CONCLUSION: The CIMT tasks were more effective than bilateral training with regard to increased UE capacity; however, this result should be cautiously interpreted since the evaluation tools were designed for assessment of unilateral UE function, not bilateral UE function. Further, the effect of the CIMT tasks on UE capacity was not translated into ADL. Considering the disadvantages of CIMT such as fatigue, bilateral training may be more appropriate for improving ADL.",
author = "Yejin Lee and Moonyoung Kim and Park, {Ji Hyuk} and Park, {Hae Yean}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/NRE-161418",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "301--313",
journal = "NeuroRehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8135",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

Comparison of the effects of bilateral and unilateral training after stroke : A meta-analysis. / Lee, Yejin; Kim, Moonyoung; Park, Ji Hyuk; Park, Hae Yean.

In: NeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 301-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effects of bilateral and unilateral training after stroke

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Lee, Yejin

AU - Kim, Moonyoung

AU - Park, Ji Hyuk

AU - Park, Hae Yean

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The differential effects of bilateral and unilateral training on upper extremity (UE) function remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral training on UE function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion by two reviewers after searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and KoreaMed. Methodological qualities were assessed using the PEDro scale. Effect size was estimated by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs of sufficient quality were included in our meta-analysis. The effect size on UE capacity was statistically significant in favor of the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) groups (SMD [fixed], g:-0.34; 95 CI:-0.59-0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 0). No other SMDs were significant. CONCLUSION: The CIMT tasks were more effective than bilateral training with regard to increased UE capacity; however, this result should be cautiously interpreted since the evaluation tools were designed for assessment of unilateral UE function, not bilateral UE function. Further, the effect of the CIMT tasks on UE capacity was not translated into ADL. Considering the disadvantages of CIMT such as fatigue, bilateral training may be more appropriate for improving ADL.

AB - BACKGROUND: The differential effects of bilateral and unilateral training on upper extremity (UE) function remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral training on UE function and activities of daily living (ADL) after stroke. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for inclusion by two reviewers after searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and KoreaMed. Methodological qualities were assessed using the PEDro scale. Effect size was estimated by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven RCTs of sufficient quality were included in our meta-analysis. The effect size on UE capacity was statistically significant in favor of the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) groups (SMD [fixed], g:-0.34; 95 CI:-0.59-0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 0). No other SMDs were significant. CONCLUSION: The CIMT tasks were more effective than bilateral training with regard to increased UE capacity; however, this result should be cautiously interpreted since the evaluation tools were designed for assessment of unilateral UE function, not bilateral UE function. Further, the effect of the CIMT tasks on UE capacity was not translated into ADL. Considering the disadvantages of CIMT such as fatigue, bilateral training may be more appropriate for improving ADL.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019119303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019119303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/NRE-161418

DO - 10.3233/NRE-161418

M3 - Article

C2 - 28211818

AN - SCOPUS:85019119303

VL - 40

SP - 301

EP - 313

JO - NeuroRehabilitation

JF - NeuroRehabilitation

SN - 1053-8135

IS - 3

ER -