Comparison of two processes forming CaCO3 precipitates by electrolysis

Hyun Sic Park; Junyoung Han; Ju Sung Lee; Kwang Mo Kim; Hyung Jun Jo; Byoung Ryul Min

doi:10.3390/en9121052

Comparison of two processes forming CaCO₃ precipitates by electrolysis

Hyun Sic Park, Junyoung Han, Ju Sung Lee, Kwang Mo Kim, Hyung Jun Jo, Byoung Ryul Min

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As one of the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies, mineral carbonation which has been introduced to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration in the atmosphere is a technology that makes it possible to capture CO₂ and recycle byproducts as resources. However, existing mineral carbonation requires additional energy and costs, as it entails high temperature and high pressure reaction conditions. This study compared two processes which electrolyze NaCl and CaCl₂ solution to produce CO₂ absorbent needed to generate CaCO₃, and which were conducted at room temperature and pressure unlike existing mineral carbonation. As a result, high-purity calcite was obtained through Process 1 using NaCl solution, and aragonite and portlandite were obtained in addition to calcite through Process 2 (two steps) using CaCl₂ solution.

Original language	English
Article number	1052
Journal	Energies
Volume	9
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/en9121052
Publication status	Published - 2016 Dec

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20154010200810).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fuel Technology
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Energy (miscellaneous)
Control and Optimization
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.3390/en9121052

Cite this

@article{35247f8c229143c98c4e119a21373660,

title = "Comparison of two processes forming CaCO3 precipitates by electrolysis",

abstract = "As one of the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies, mineral carbonation which has been introduced to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere is a technology that makes it possible to capture CO2 and recycle byproducts as resources. However, existing mineral carbonation requires additional energy and costs, as it entails high temperature and high pressure reaction conditions. This study compared two processes which electrolyze NaCl and CaCl2 solution to produce CO2 absorbent needed to generate CaCO3, and which were conducted at room temperature and pressure unlike existing mineral carbonation. As a result, high-purity calcite was obtained through Process 1 using NaCl solution, and aragonite and portlandite were obtained in addition to calcite through Process 2 (two steps) using CaCl2 solution.",

author = "Park, {Hyun Sic} and Junyoung Han and Lee, {Ju Sung} and Kim, {Kwang Mo} and Jo, {Hyung Jun} and Min, {Byoung Ryul}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20154010200810). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI.",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

doi = "10.3390/en9121052",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "Energies",

issn = "1996-1073",

publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of two processes forming CaCO3 precipitates by electrolysis

AU - Park, Hyun Sic

AU - Han, Junyoung

AU - Lee, Ju Sung

AU - Kim, Kwang Mo

AU - Jo, Hyung Jun

AU - Min, Byoung Ryul

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20154010200810). Publisher Copyright: © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - As one of the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies, mineral carbonation which has been introduced to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere is a technology that makes it possible to capture CO2 and recycle byproducts as resources. However, existing mineral carbonation requires additional energy and costs, as it entails high temperature and high pressure reaction conditions. This study compared two processes which electrolyze NaCl and CaCl2 solution to produce CO2 absorbent needed to generate CaCO3, and which were conducted at room temperature and pressure unlike existing mineral carbonation. As a result, high-purity calcite was obtained through Process 1 using NaCl solution, and aragonite and portlandite were obtained in addition to calcite through Process 2 (two steps) using CaCl2 solution.

AB - As one of the carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies, mineral carbonation which has been introduced to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere is a technology that makes it possible to capture CO2 and recycle byproducts as resources. However, existing mineral carbonation requires additional energy and costs, as it entails high temperature and high pressure reaction conditions. This study compared two processes which electrolyze NaCl and CaCl2 solution to produce CO2 absorbent needed to generate CaCO3, and which were conducted at room temperature and pressure unlike existing mineral carbonation. As a result, high-purity calcite was obtained through Process 1 using NaCl solution, and aragonite and portlandite were obtained in addition to calcite through Process 2 (two steps) using CaCl2 solution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020491436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020491436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/en9121052

DO - 10.3390/en9121052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020491436

VL - 9

JO - Energies

JF - Energies

SN - 1996-1073

IS - 12

M1 - 1052

ER -