Comparisons of cloud microphysics with cloud condensation nuclei spectra over the summertime Southern Ocean

Seong Soo Yum, James G. Hudson, Yonghong Xie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In spite of the many factors that determine cloud droplet concentrations, relationships were found between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and cloud droplet concentrations for the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1). Measurements were made in summertime stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean far from anthropogenic sources. The closest relationship of CCN and droplet concentrations was found for CCN measured just below near-adiabatic cloud parcels. Moreover, an adiabatic droplet growth model successfully predicted these droplet concentrations from the CCN spectra and updraft velocities. Correlations of the averages of CCN and cloud droplet concentrations over the entirety of each of the flights were also good. The model also predicted, with reasonable accuracy, these flight-wide average droplet concentrations from flight-wide average CCN spectra and flight-wide average cloud updraft velocities. Drizzle was a major reason for the larger variations in droplet concentrations than in CCN concentrations. Vertical differences in CCN concentrations may have also affected cloud droplet concentrations. Despite variabilities in droplet concentrations, there was a clear relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations. Many of the inferred supersaturations (0.5 to 1.4%) in the "adiabatic" clouds ranged higher than some previous estimates (e.g., 0.2%) for stratus clouds. This may have been due to the cleaner air of the Southern Ocean but is more likely attributable to the more intensive analysis used in this study. Nonetheless, even where the inferred cloud supersaturations were lower (i.e., 0.2%), due to reductions of the droplet concentrations, there was still a relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number98JD01513
Pages (from-to)16625-16636
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Volume103
Issue numberD13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jul 20

Fingerprint

condensation nuclei
cloud microphysics
cloud condensation nucleus
droplets
Condensation
oceans
droplet
ocean
cloud droplet
flight
updraft
supersaturation
Supersaturation
vertical air currents
ACE 1
comparison
drizzle
stratus
stratocumulus
Air cleaners

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

@article{265ac4ad461a4570a05c805be2fad79f,
title = "Comparisons of cloud microphysics with cloud condensation nuclei spectra over the summertime Southern Ocean",
abstract = "In spite of the many factors that determine cloud droplet concentrations, relationships were found between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and cloud droplet concentrations for the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1). Measurements were made in summertime stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean far from anthropogenic sources. The closest relationship of CCN and droplet concentrations was found for CCN measured just below near-adiabatic cloud parcels. Moreover, an adiabatic droplet growth model successfully predicted these droplet concentrations from the CCN spectra and updraft velocities. Correlations of the averages of CCN and cloud droplet concentrations over the entirety of each of the flights were also good. The model also predicted, with reasonable accuracy, these flight-wide average droplet concentrations from flight-wide average CCN spectra and flight-wide average cloud updraft velocities. Drizzle was a major reason for the larger variations in droplet concentrations than in CCN concentrations. Vertical differences in CCN concentrations may have also affected cloud droplet concentrations. Despite variabilities in droplet concentrations, there was a clear relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations. Many of the inferred supersaturations (0.5 to 1.4{\%}) in the {"}adiabatic{"} clouds ranged higher than some previous estimates (e.g., 0.2{\%}) for stratus clouds. This may have been due to the cleaner air of the Southern Ocean but is more likely attributable to the more intensive analysis used in this study. Nonetheless, even where the inferred cloud supersaturations were lower (i.e., 0.2{\%}), due to reductions of the droplet concentrations, there was still a relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations.",
author = "Yum, {Seong Soo} and Hudson, {James G.} and Yonghong Xie",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1029/98JD01513",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "16625--16636",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "D13",

}

Comparisons of cloud microphysics with cloud condensation nuclei spectra over the summertime Southern Ocean. / Yum, Seong Soo; Hudson, James G.; Xie, Yonghong.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Vol. 103, No. D13, 98JD01513, 20.07.1998, p. 16625-16636.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of cloud microphysics with cloud condensation nuclei spectra over the summertime Southern Ocean

AU - Yum, Seong Soo

AU - Hudson, James G.

AU - Xie, Yonghong

PY - 1998/7/20

Y1 - 1998/7/20

N2 - In spite of the many factors that determine cloud droplet concentrations, relationships were found between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and cloud droplet concentrations for the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1). Measurements were made in summertime stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean far from anthropogenic sources. The closest relationship of CCN and droplet concentrations was found for CCN measured just below near-adiabatic cloud parcels. Moreover, an adiabatic droplet growth model successfully predicted these droplet concentrations from the CCN spectra and updraft velocities. Correlations of the averages of CCN and cloud droplet concentrations over the entirety of each of the flights were also good. The model also predicted, with reasonable accuracy, these flight-wide average droplet concentrations from flight-wide average CCN spectra and flight-wide average cloud updraft velocities. Drizzle was a major reason for the larger variations in droplet concentrations than in CCN concentrations. Vertical differences in CCN concentrations may have also affected cloud droplet concentrations. Despite variabilities in droplet concentrations, there was a clear relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations. Many of the inferred supersaturations (0.5 to 1.4%) in the "adiabatic" clouds ranged higher than some previous estimates (e.g., 0.2%) for stratus clouds. This may have been due to the cleaner air of the Southern Ocean but is more likely attributable to the more intensive analysis used in this study. Nonetheless, even where the inferred cloud supersaturations were lower (i.e., 0.2%), due to reductions of the droplet concentrations, there was still a relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations.

AB - In spite of the many factors that determine cloud droplet concentrations, relationships were found between cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and cloud droplet concentrations for the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1). Measurements were made in summertime stratocumulus clouds over the Southern Ocean far from anthropogenic sources. The closest relationship of CCN and droplet concentrations was found for CCN measured just below near-adiabatic cloud parcels. Moreover, an adiabatic droplet growth model successfully predicted these droplet concentrations from the CCN spectra and updraft velocities. Correlations of the averages of CCN and cloud droplet concentrations over the entirety of each of the flights were also good. The model also predicted, with reasonable accuracy, these flight-wide average droplet concentrations from flight-wide average CCN spectra and flight-wide average cloud updraft velocities. Drizzle was a major reason for the larger variations in droplet concentrations than in CCN concentrations. Vertical differences in CCN concentrations may have also affected cloud droplet concentrations. Despite variabilities in droplet concentrations, there was a clear relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations. Many of the inferred supersaturations (0.5 to 1.4%) in the "adiabatic" clouds ranged higher than some previous estimates (e.g., 0.2%) for stratus clouds. This may have been due to the cleaner air of the Southern Ocean but is more likely attributable to the more intensive analysis used in this study. Nonetheless, even where the inferred cloud supersaturations were lower (i.e., 0.2%), due to reductions of the droplet concentrations, there was still a relationship between CCN and droplet concentrations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542678176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542678176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/98JD01513

DO - 10.1029/98JD01513

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:1542678176

VL - 103

SP - 16625

EP - 16636

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - D13

M1 - 98JD01513

ER -