Computation of mean size is based on perceived size

Hee Yeon Im, Sang Chul Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-384
Number of pages10
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Feb 1

Fingerprint

experiment
coding
Visual Fields
Physical
Illusion
Experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

@article{4fef519f38244e38a7ee88413de04b2a,
title = "Computation of mean size is based on perceived size",
abstract = "The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.",
author = "Im, {Hee Yeon} and Chong, {Sang Chul}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/APP.71.2.375",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "375--384",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Computation of mean size is based on perceived size. / Im, Hee Yeon; Chong, Sang Chul.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 71, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 375-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computation of mean size is based on perceived size

AU - Im, Hee Yeon

AU - Chong, Sang Chul

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.

AB - The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64749112620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64749112620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/APP.71.2.375

DO - 10.3758/APP.71.2.375

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 375

EP - 384

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 2

ER -