Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms

Sun Ki Chai, Mooweon Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A long-standing debate has taken place in the organizational sociology and social network literatures about the relative advantages of network closure versus structural holes in the generation of social capital. There is recent evidence that these advantages differ across cultures and between East Asia and the West in particular, but existing network models are unable to explain why or address cultural variation in general. This paper seeks to provide a solution by integrating a culture-embedded rational model of action into the social network model of structure, using this not only to re-examine the closure versus structural hole debate, but also to tie it to the literature on Confucian capitalism and the 'East Asian Model' of the firm. We argue that this integrated approach allows us to systematically analyse the relationship between culture and behaviour in networks and, more specifically, to explain why closure has been a more powerful source of productivity in East Asia than the West.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-29
Number of pages25
JournalManagement and Organization Review
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Closure
Structural holes
Asia
Paradox
Capitalism
East Asia
Network model
Social networks
Sociology
Cultural variation
Relative advantage
Integrated approach
Productivity
Social capital

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{4145243ee27b4eed8101e0da727ea9ec,
title = "Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms",
abstract = "A long-standing debate has taken place in the organizational sociology and social network literatures about the relative advantages of network closure versus structural holes in the generation of social capital. There is recent evidence that these advantages differ across cultures and between East Asia and the West in particular, but existing network models are unable to explain why or address cultural variation in general. This paper seeks to provide a solution by integrating a culture-embedded rational model of action into the social network model of structure, using this not only to re-examine the closure versus structural hole debate, but also to tie it to the literature on Confucian capitalism and the 'East Asian Model' of the firm. We argue that this integrated approach allows us to systematically analyse the relationship between culture and behaviour in networks and, more specifically, to explain why closure has been a more powerful source of productivity in East Asia than the West.",
author = "Chai, {Sun Ki} and Mooweon Rhee",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00168.x",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "5--29",
journal = "Management and Organization Review",
issn = "1740-8776",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. / Chai, Sun Ki; Rhee, Mooweon.

In: Management and Organization Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.03.2010, p. 5-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms

AU - Chai, Sun Ki

AU - Rhee, Mooweon

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - A long-standing debate has taken place in the organizational sociology and social network literatures about the relative advantages of network closure versus structural holes in the generation of social capital. There is recent evidence that these advantages differ across cultures and between East Asia and the West in particular, but existing network models are unable to explain why or address cultural variation in general. This paper seeks to provide a solution by integrating a culture-embedded rational model of action into the social network model of structure, using this not only to re-examine the closure versus structural hole debate, but also to tie it to the literature on Confucian capitalism and the 'East Asian Model' of the firm. We argue that this integrated approach allows us to systematically analyse the relationship between culture and behaviour in networks and, more specifically, to explain why closure has been a more powerful source of productivity in East Asia than the West.

AB - A long-standing debate has taken place in the organizational sociology and social network literatures about the relative advantages of network closure versus structural holes in the generation of social capital. There is recent evidence that these advantages differ across cultures and between East Asia and the West in particular, but existing network models are unable to explain why or address cultural variation in general. This paper seeks to provide a solution by integrating a culture-embedded rational model of action into the social network model of structure, using this not only to re-examine the closure versus structural hole debate, but also to tie it to the literature on Confucian capitalism and the 'East Asian Model' of the firm. We argue that this integrated approach allows us to systematically analyse the relationship between culture and behaviour in networks and, more specifically, to explain why closure has been a more powerful source of productivity in East Asia than the West.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951946774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951946774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00168.x

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 5

EP - 29

JO - Management and Organization Review

JF - Management and Organization Review

SN - 1740-8776

IS - 1

ER -