Confucian constitutionalism: Mencius and xunzi on virtue, ritual, and royal transmission

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

By examining Xunzi's and Mencius's contrary reactions toward royal transmission by individual merit or "abdication" (shanrang), this article attempts to reveal the distinctive features of their respective political theories, which I reconstruct in terms of lizhi constitutionalism and dezhi constitutionalism. Resisting the conventional tendency to capture Mencius's and Xunzi's political theories in such dichotomous terms as idealism and realism, this paper draws attention to the complex mixture of idealism and realism found in both thinkers' constitutional political theories and identifies such common ground in terms of "Confucian constitutionalism." This paper presents Mencius's idealistic defense of abdication and his realistic resolution of the constitutional crisis latent in it, then it examines Xunzi's refutation of the three conventional rationalizations of abdication, and it concludes by recapitulating the common Confucian constitutionalist ground that Mencius and Xunzi shared and discussing its implications for the study of constitutional theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-399
Number of pages29
JournalReview of Politics
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jun 1

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
political theory
religious behavior
idealism
realism
rationalization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{dacd0f7670d54167a9a3def4f29e7a8b,
title = "Confucian constitutionalism: Mencius and xunzi on virtue, ritual, and royal transmission",
abstract = "By examining Xunzi's and Mencius's contrary reactions toward royal transmission by individual merit or {"}abdication{"} (shanrang), this article attempts to reveal the distinctive features of their respective political theories, which I reconstruct in terms of lizhi constitutionalism and dezhi constitutionalism. Resisting the conventional tendency to capture Mencius's and Xunzi's political theories in such dichotomous terms as idealism and realism, this paper draws attention to the complex mixture of idealism and realism found in both thinkers' constitutional political theories and identifies such common ground in terms of {"}Confucian constitutionalism.{"} This paper presents Mencius's idealistic defense of abdication and his realistic resolution of the constitutional crisis latent in it, then it examines Xunzi's refutation of the three conventional rationalizations of abdication, and it concludes by recapitulating the common Confucian constitutionalist ground that Mencius and Xunzi shared and discussing its implications for the study of constitutional theory.",
author = "Sungmoon Kim",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S003467051100341X",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "371--399",
journal = "Review of Politics",
issn = "0034-6705",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Confucian constitutionalism : Mencius and xunzi on virtue, ritual, and royal transmission. / Kim, Sungmoon.

In: Review of Politics, Vol. 73, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 371-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confucian constitutionalism

T2 - Mencius and xunzi on virtue, ritual, and royal transmission

AU - Kim, Sungmoon

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - By examining Xunzi's and Mencius's contrary reactions toward royal transmission by individual merit or "abdication" (shanrang), this article attempts to reveal the distinctive features of their respective political theories, which I reconstruct in terms of lizhi constitutionalism and dezhi constitutionalism. Resisting the conventional tendency to capture Mencius's and Xunzi's political theories in such dichotomous terms as idealism and realism, this paper draws attention to the complex mixture of idealism and realism found in both thinkers' constitutional political theories and identifies such common ground in terms of "Confucian constitutionalism." This paper presents Mencius's idealistic defense of abdication and his realistic resolution of the constitutional crisis latent in it, then it examines Xunzi's refutation of the three conventional rationalizations of abdication, and it concludes by recapitulating the common Confucian constitutionalist ground that Mencius and Xunzi shared and discussing its implications for the study of constitutional theory.

AB - By examining Xunzi's and Mencius's contrary reactions toward royal transmission by individual merit or "abdication" (shanrang), this article attempts to reveal the distinctive features of their respective political theories, which I reconstruct in terms of lizhi constitutionalism and dezhi constitutionalism. Resisting the conventional tendency to capture Mencius's and Xunzi's political theories in such dichotomous terms as idealism and realism, this paper draws attention to the complex mixture of idealism and realism found in both thinkers' constitutional political theories and identifies such common ground in terms of "Confucian constitutionalism." This paper presents Mencius's idealistic defense of abdication and his realistic resolution of the constitutional crisis latent in it, then it examines Xunzi's refutation of the three conventional rationalizations of abdication, and it concludes by recapitulating the common Confucian constitutionalist ground that Mencius and Xunzi shared and discussing its implications for the study of constitutional theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054939852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054939852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S003467051100341X

DO - 10.1017/S003467051100341X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80054939852

VL - 73

SP - 371

EP - 399

JO - Review of Politics

JF - Review of Politics

SN - 0034-6705

IS - 3

ER -