Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay

Ji Woon Park, Hyeong Rae Kim, Jungho Hwang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a methodology for continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring wherein an aerosol-to-hydrosol sampler is integrated with a bioluminescence detector. Laboratory test was conducted by supplying an air flow with entrained test bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis) to the inlet of the sampler. High voltage was applied between the discharge electrode and the ground electrode of the sampler to generate air ions by corona discharge. The bacterial aerosols were charged by the air ions and sampled in a flowing liquid containing both a cell lysis buffer and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence reagents. While the liquid was delivered to the bioluminescence detector, sampled bacteria were dissolved by the cell lysis buffer and ATP was extracted. The ATP was reacted with the ATP bioluminescence reagents, causing light to be emitted. When the concentration of bacteria in the aerosols was varied, the ATP bioluminescence signal in relative light units (RLUs) closely tracked the concentration in particles per unit air volume (# cm−3), as measured by an aerosol particle sizer. The total response time required for aerosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence detection increased from 30 s to 2 min for decreasing liquid sampling flow rate from 800 to 200 μLPM, respectively. However, lower concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols was able to be detected with lower liquid sampling flow rate (1 RLU corresponded to 6.5 # cm−3 of S. epidermidis aerosols at 200 μLPM and 25.5 # cm−3 at 800 μLPM). After obtaining all data sets of concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols and concentration of S. epidermidis particles collected in the flowing liquid, it was found that with our bioluminescence detector, 1 RLU corresponded to 1.8 × 105 (±0.2 × 105) # mL−1 of S. epidermidis in liquid. After the lab-test with S. epidermidis, our bioaerosol monitoring device was located in the lobby of a building. Air sampling was conducted continuously for 90 min (air flow rate of 8 LPM, liquid flow rate of 200 μLPM) and the ATP bioluminescence signal of indoor bioaerosols was displayed with time. Air sampling was also carried out using the 6th stage of Andersen impactor in which a nutrient agar plate was used for the impaction plate. The sample was cultured at 37 °C for five days for colony counting. As a result, it was found that the variation of the bioluminescence signal closely followed the variation of indoor bioaerosol concentration in colony forming unit (CFU) and 1 RLU corresponded to 1.66 CFU m−3 of indoor bioaerosols. Our method can be used as a trigger in biological air contamination alarm systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-107
Number of pages7
JournalAnalytica Chimica Acta
Volume941
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 19

Fingerprint

Bioluminescence
bioluminescence
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Aerosols
Assays
Adenosine Triphosphate
Air
assay
aerosol
Sampling
Monitoring
sampling
monitoring
liquid
Liquids
Light
Flow rate
sampler
Bacteria
air sampling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy

Cite this

@article{97070aa2338247a58b577ec2ef1817b4,
title = "Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay",
abstract = "We present a methodology for continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring wherein an aerosol-to-hydrosol sampler is integrated with a bioluminescence detector. Laboratory test was conducted by supplying an air flow with entrained test bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis) to the inlet of the sampler. High voltage was applied between the discharge electrode and the ground electrode of the sampler to generate air ions by corona discharge. The bacterial aerosols were charged by the air ions and sampled in a flowing liquid containing both a cell lysis buffer and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence reagents. While the liquid was delivered to the bioluminescence detector, sampled bacteria were dissolved by the cell lysis buffer and ATP was extracted. The ATP was reacted with the ATP bioluminescence reagents, causing light to be emitted. When the concentration of bacteria in the aerosols was varied, the ATP bioluminescence signal in relative light units (RLUs) closely tracked the concentration in particles per unit air volume (# cm−3), as measured by an aerosol particle sizer. The total response time required for aerosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence detection increased from 30 s to 2 min for decreasing liquid sampling flow rate from 800 to 200 μLPM, respectively. However, lower concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols was able to be detected with lower liquid sampling flow rate (1 RLU corresponded to 6.5 # cm−3 of S. epidermidis aerosols at 200 μLPM and 25.5 # cm−3 at 800 μLPM). After obtaining all data sets of concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols and concentration of S. epidermidis particles collected in the flowing liquid, it was found that with our bioluminescence detector, 1 RLU corresponded to 1.8 × 105 (±0.2 × 105) # mL−1 of S. epidermidis in liquid. After the lab-test with S. epidermidis, our bioaerosol monitoring device was located in the lobby of a building. Air sampling was conducted continuously for 90 min (air flow rate of 8 LPM, liquid flow rate of 200 μLPM) and the ATP bioluminescence signal of indoor bioaerosols was displayed with time. Air sampling was also carried out using the 6th stage of Andersen impactor in which a nutrient agar plate was used for the impaction plate. The sample was cultured at 37 °C for five days for colony counting. As a result, it was found that the variation of the bioluminescence signal closely followed the variation of indoor bioaerosol concentration in colony forming unit (CFU) and 1 RLU corresponded to 1.66 CFU m−3 of indoor bioaerosols. Our method can be used as a trigger in biological air contamination alarm systems.",
author = "Park, {Ji Woon} and Kim, {Hyeong Rae} and Jungho Hwang",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.aca.2016.08.039",
language = "English",
volume = "941",
pages = "101--107",
journal = "Analytica Chimica Acta",
issn = "0003-2670",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay. / Park, Ji Woon; Kim, Hyeong Rae; Hwang, Jungho.

In: Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 941, 19.10.2016, p. 101-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay

AU - Park, Ji Woon

AU - Kim, Hyeong Rae

AU - Hwang, Jungho

PY - 2016/10/19

Y1 - 2016/10/19

N2 - We present a methodology for continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring wherein an aerosol-to-hydrosol sampler is integrated with a bioluminescence detector. Laboratory test was conducted by supplying an air flow with entrained test bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis) to the inlet of the sampler. High voltage was applied between the discharge electrode and the ground electrode of the sampler to generate air ions by corona discharge. The bacterial aerosols were charged by the air ions and sampled in a flowing liquid containing both a cell lysis buffer and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence reagents. While the liquid was delivered to the bioluminescence detector, sampled bacteria were dissolved by the cell lysis buffer and ATP was extracted. The ATP was reacted with the ATP bioluminescence reagents, causing light to be emitted. When the concentration of bacteria in the aerosols was varied, the ATP bioluminescence signal in relative light units (RLUs) closely tracked the concentration in particles per unit air volume (# cm−3), as measured by an aerosol particle sizer. The total response time required for aerosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence detection increased from 30 s to 2 min for decreasing liquid sampling flow rate from 800 to 200 μLPM, respectively. However, lower concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols was able to be detected with lower liquid sampling flow rate (1 RLU corresponded to 6.5 # cm−3 of S. epidermidis aerosols at 200 μLPM and 25.5 # cm−3 at 800 μLPM). After obtaining all data sets of concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols and concentration of S. epidermidis particles collected in the flowing liquid, it was found that with our bioluminescence detector, 1 RLU corresponded to 1.8 × 105 (±0.2 × 105) # mL−1 of S. epidermidis in liquid. After the lab-test with S. epidermidis, our bioaerosol monitoring device was located in the lobby of a building. Air sampling was conducted continuously for 90 min (air flow rate of 8 LPM, liquid flow rate of 200 μLPM) and the ATP bioluminescence signal of indoor bioaerosols was displayed with time. Air sampling was also carried out using the 6th stage of Andersen impactor in which a nutrient agar plate was used for the impaction plate. The sample was cultured at 37 °C for five days for colony counting. As a result, it was found that the variation of the bioluminescence signal closely followed the variation of indoor bioaerosol concentration in colony forming unit (CFU) and 1 RLU corresponded to 1.66 CFU m−3 of indoor bioaerosols. Our method can be used as a trigger in biological air contamination alarm systems.

AB - We present a methodology for continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring wherein an aerosol-to-hydrosol sampler is integrated with a bioluminescence detector. Laboratory test was conducted by supplying an air flow with entrained test bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis) to the inlet of the sampler. High voltage was applied between the discharge electrode and the ground electrode of the sampler to generate air ions by corona discharge. The bacterial aerosols were charged by the air ions and sampled in a flowing liquid containing both a cell lysis buffer and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence reagents. While the liquid was delivered to the bioluminescence detector, sampled bacteria were dissolved by the cell lysis buffer and ATP was extracted. The ATP was reacted with the ATP bioluminescence reagents, causing light to be emitted. When the concentration of bacteria in the aerosols was varied, the ATP bioluminescence signal in relative light units (RLUs) closely tracked the concentration in particles per unit air volume (# cm−3), as measured by an aerosol particle sizer. The total response time required for aerosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence detection increased from 30 s to 2 min for decreasing liquid sampling flow rate from 800 to 200 μLPM, respectively. However, lower concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols was able to be detected with lower liquid sampling flow rate (1 RLU corresponded to 6.5 # cm−3 of S. epidermidis aerosols at 200 μLPM and 25.5 # cm−3 at 800 μLPM). After obtaining all data sets of concentration of S. epidermidis aerosols and concentration of S. epidermidis particles collected in the flowing liquid, it was found that with our bioluminescence detector, 1 RLU corresponded to 1.8 × 105 (±0.2 × 105) # mL−1 of S. epidermidis in liquid. After the lab-test with S. epidermidis, our bioaerosol monitoring device was located in the lobby of a building. Air sampling was conducted continuously for 90 min (air flow rate of 8 LPM, liquid flow rate of 200 μLPM) and the ATP bioluminescence signal of indoor bioaerosols was displayed with time. Air sampling was also carried out using the 6th stage of Andersen impactor in which a nutrient agar plate was used for the impaction plate. The sample was cultured at 37 °C for five days for colony counting. As a result, it was found that the variation of the bioluminescence signal closely followed the variation of indoor bioaerosol concentration in colony forming unit (CFU) and 1 RLU corresponded to 1.66 CFU m−3 of indoor bioaerosols. Our method can be used as a trigger in biological air contamination alarm systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990050309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990050309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aca.2016.08.039

DO - 10.1016/j.aca.2016.08.039

M3 - Article

C2 - 27692374

AN - SCOPUS:84990050309

VL - 941

SP - 101

EP - 107

JO - Analytica Chimica Acta

JF - Analytica Chimica Acta

SN - 0003-2670

ER -