Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract

Young Taek Hong, Sang Woo Kim, Eungkweon Kim, Tae-im Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reliability of and correlation between 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Methods: The Vision Contrast Test System (wall-chart test) and Optec 6500 system (view-in test) were used to measure contrast sensitivity in normal eyes at 2 visits separated by 2 weeks and in eyes with cataract before and 2 months after cataract surgery. The test-retest reliability and correlation were calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (COR), and 95% range of difference using the Bland-Altman method. Results: The study evaluated 40 normal eyes of 20 subjects and 44 eyes of 38 cataract patients. The repeatability of the 2 test methods was generally acceptable. The view-in test performed better than the wall-chart test in the ICC analysis (0.85 versus 0.65) but not in the COR analysis (±0.20 log versus ±0.27 log). Correlation between the 2 tests was poor in both groups of eyes. The ceiling effect was greater with the wall-chart test. The floor effect occurred mainly in patients with cataract, in which it was greater preoperatively than postoperatively; at high frequency; and with the view-in test. Conclusion: Based on the ceiling and floor effect, the view-in test is better for detecting subtle contrast sensitivity changes in normal or near-normal eyes and the wall-chart test is useful in eyes with compromised vision. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Contrast Sensitivity
Cataract
Vision Tests
Disclosure
Ophthalmology
Korea
Reproducibility of Results

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

@article{18c21988fb27402ab8ec49dd633062c4,
title = "Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the reliability of and correlation between 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Methods: The Vision Contrast Test System (wall-chart test) and Optec 6500 system (view-in test) were used to measure contrast sensitivity in normal eyes at 2 visits separated by 2 weeks and in eyes with cataract before and 2 months after cataract surgery. The test-retest reliability and correlation were calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (COR), and 95{\%} range of difference using the Bland-Altman method. Results: The study evaluated 40 normal eyes of 20 subjects and 44 eyes of 38 cataract patients. The repeatability of the 2 test methods was generally acceptable. The view-in test performed better than the wall-chart test in the ICC analysis (0.85 versus 0.65) but not in the COR analysis (±0.20 log versus ±0.27 log). Correlation between the 2 tests was poor in both groups of eyes. The ceiling effect was greater with the wall-chart test. The floor effect occurred mainly in patients with cataract, in which it was greater preoperatively than postoperatively; at high frequency; and with the view-in test. Conclusion: Based on the ceiling and floor effect, the view-in test is better for detecting subtle contrast sensitivity changes in normal or near-normal eyes and the wall-chart test is useful in eyes with compromised vision. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Hong, {Young Taek} and Kim, {Sang Woo} and Eungkweon Kim and Tae-im Kim",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.048",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "547--552",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. / Hong, Young Taek; Kim, Sang Woo; Kim, Eungkweon; Kim, Tae-im.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 547-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract

AU - Hong, Young Taek

AU - Kim, Sang Woo

AU - Kim, Eungkweon

AU - Kim, Tae-im

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the reliability of and correlation between 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Methods: The Vision Contrast Test System (wall-chart test) and Optec 6500 system (view-in test) were used to measure contrast sensitivity in normal eyes at 2 visits separated by 2 weeks and in eyes with cataract before and 2 months after cataract surgery. The test-retest reliability and correlation were calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (COR), and 95% range of difference using the Bland-Altman method. Results: The study evaluated 40 normal eyes of 20 subjects and 44 eyes of 38 cataract patients. The repeatability of the 2 test methods was generally acceptable. The view-in test performed better than the wall-chart test in the ICC analysis (0.85 versus 0.65) but not in the COR analysis (±0.20 log versus ±0.27 log). Correlation between the 2 tests was poor in both groups of eyes. The ceiling effect was greater with the wall-chart test. The floor effect occurred mainly in patients with cataract, in which it was greater preoperatively than postoperatively; at high frequency; and with the view-in test. Conclusion: Based on the ceiling and floor effect, the view-in test is better for detecting subtle contrast sensitivity changes in normal or near-normal eyes and the wall-chart test is useful in eyes with compromised vision. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose: To assess the reliability of and correlation between 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Methods: The Vision Contrast Test System (wall-chart test) and Optec 6500 system (view-in test) were used to measure contrast sensitivity in normal eyes at 2 visits separated by 2 weeks and in eyes with cataract before and 2 months after cataract surgery. The test-retest reliability and correlation were calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability (COR), and 95% range of difference using the Bland-Altman method. Results: The study evaluated 40 normal eyes of 20 subjects and 44 eyes of 38 cataract patients. The repeatability of the 2 test methods was generally acceptable. The view-in test performed better than the wall-chart test in the ICC analysis (0.85 versus 0.65) but not in the COR analysis (±0.20 log versus ±0.27 log). Correlation between the 2 tests was poor in both groups of eyes. The ceiling effect was greater with the wall-chart test. The floor effect occurred mainly in patients with cataract, in which it was greater preoperatively than postoperatively; at high frequency; and with the view-in test. Conclusion: Based on the ceiling and floor effect, the view-in test is better for detecting subtle contrast sensitivity changes in normal or near-normal eyes and the wall-chart test is useful in eyes with compromised vision. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950259488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950259488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.048

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.048

M3 - Article

C2 - 20362843

AN - SCOPUS:77950259488

VL - 36

SP - 547

EP - 552

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 4

ER -