Correction; “Older adults consider others’ intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game” (Psychology and Aging, (2020), 35(7), (974–980), (10.1037/pag0000577))

Reports an error in "Older adults consider others’ intentions less but allocentric outcomes more than young adults during an ultimatum game" by Isu Cho, Hyun-joo Song, Hackjin Kim and Sunhae Sul (Psychology and Aging, 2020[Nov], Vol 35[7], 974-980). In the original article, there was a typographical error in the grant number awarded to Hyun-joo Song. The correct grant number is NRF-2018S1A3A2075114. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-68198-001). The present research investigated age-related differences in other-regarding preferences—the preference for taking others’ benefit into account during social decision-making—between young and elderly adults. Young and older Korean adults responded to multiple rounds of a mini-ultimatum game, and the extent to which each individual considered outcome and intention was quantified using economic utility models. We found that older adults, compared to young adults, were less likely to consider others’ intentions, while focusing more on others’ outcomes. Possible psychological factors underlying our findings, including theory of mind, prosocial values, and decision strategies, are discussed.