Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence

Sang Wook Bai, Kyung Ah Chung, KoonHo Rha, Sang Un Kim, Sei Kwang Kim, Ki Hyun Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the results of urodynamic tests and the perineal ultrasound were different between grade 1 and 2 stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Forty premenopausal women with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence according to urodynamic tests were enrolled in this study. Stress urinary incontinence was defined as urine leakage during stress without detrusor contraction. Twenty patients had grade 1 and 20 had grade 2 stress urinary incontinence. We compared the parameters of uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, urethral pressure profile, dynamic urethral function test, perineal ultrasound and stress urethral axis between grade 1 and 2 levels of stress urinanry incontience. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, parity or body mass index between the grade 1 and 2 patients. Uroflowmetry results showed that there were no significant differences in maximal flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume or residual urine between grade 1 and 2. As to cystometry results, only the first desire to void was significantly increased in grade 2 over 1 (304 ± 113.65 vs. 194 ± 48.24 [mL], P = .04). There were no significant differences in any of the urethral pressure profile parameters. In the dynamic test, the Valsalva leak point pressure and cough leak point pressure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in perineal ultrasound parameters or the stress urethral axis. CONCLUSION: Most stress urinary incontinence-related parameters showed no difference between the grade 1 and 2, and no urodynamic or ultrasonographic evidence for a difference between the grade 1 and 2 was demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)718-722
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume48
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Sep 1

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Urodynamics
Pressure
Urine
Residual Volume
Parity
Cough
Body Mass Index

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Bai, Sang Wook ; Chung, Kyung Ah ; Rha, KoonHo ; Kim, Sang Un ; Kim, Sei Kwang ; Park, Ki Hyun. / Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence. In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 2003 ; Vol. 48, No. 9. pp. 718-722.
@article{dab70c8a1ca443ab89bee93f909c4705,
title = "Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the results of urodynamic tests and the perineal ultrasound were different between grade 1 and 2 stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Forty premenopausal women with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence according to urodynamic tests were enrolled in this study. Stress urinary incontinence was defined as urine leakage during stress without detrusor contraction. Twenty patients had grade 1 and 20 had grade 2 stress urinary incontinence. We compared the parameters of uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, urethral pressure profile, dynamic urethral function test, perineal ultrasound and stress urethral axis between grade 1 and 2 levels of stress urinanry incontience. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, parity or body mass index between the grade 1 and 2 patients. Uroflowmetry results showed that there were no significant differences in maximal flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume or residual urine between grade 1 and 2. As to cystometry results, only the first desire to void was significantly increased in grade 2 over 1 (304 ± 113.65 vs. 194 ± 48.24 [mL], P = .04). There were no significant differences in any of the urethral pressure profile parameters. In the dynamic test, the Valsalva leak point pressure and cough leak point pressure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in perineal ultrasound parameters or the stress urethral axis. CONCLUSION: Most stress urinary incontinence-related parameters showed no difference between the grade 1 and 2, and no urodynamic or ultrasonographic evidence for a difference between the grade 1 and 2 was demonstrated.",
author = "Bai, {Sang Wook} and Chung, {Kyung Ah} and KoonHo Rha and Kim, {Sang Un} and Kim, {Sei Kwang} and Park, {Ki Hyun}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "718--722",
journal = "The Journal of reproductive medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "9",

}

Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence. / Bai, Sang Wook; Chung, Kyung Ah; Rha, KoonHo; Kim, Sang Un; Kim, Sei Kwang; Park, Ki Hyun.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 48, No. 9, 01.09.2003, p. 718-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlation between urodynamic test results, perineal ultrasound and degree of stress urinary incontinence

AU - Bai, Sang Wook

AU - Chung, Kyung Ah

AU - Rha, KoonHo

AU - Kim, Sang Un

AU - Kim, Sei Kwang

AU - Park, Ki Hyun

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the results of urodynamic tests and the perineal ultrasound were different between grade 1 and 2 stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Forty premenopausal women with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence according to urodynamic tests were enrolled in this study. Stress urinary incontinence was defined as urine leakage during stress without detrusor contraction. Twenty patients had grade 1 and 20 had grade 2 stress urinary incontinence. We compared the parameters of uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, urethral pressure profile, dynamic urethral function test, perineal ultrasound and stress urethral axis between grade 1 and 2 levels of stress urinanry incontience. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, parity or body mass index between the grade 1 and 2 patients. Uroflowmetry results showed that there were no significant differences in maximal flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume or residual urine between grade 1 and 2. As to cystometry results, only the first desire to void was significantly increased in grade 2 over 1 (304 ± 113.65 vs. 194 ± 48.24 [mL], P = .04). There were no significant differences in any of the urethral pressure profile parameters. In the dynamic test, the Valsalva leak point pressure and cough leak point pressure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in perineal ultrasound parameters or the stress urethral axis. CONCLUSION: Most stress urinary incontinence-related parameters showed no difference between the grade 1 and 2, and no urodynamic or ultrasonographic evidence for a difference between the grade 1 and 2 was demonstrated.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the results of urodynamic tests and the perineal ultrasound were different between grade 1 and 2 stress urinary incontinence. STUDY DESIGN: Forty premenopausal women with a diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence according to urodynamic tests were enrolled in this study. Stress urinary incontinence was defined as urine leakage during stress without detrusor contraction. Twenty patients had grade 1 and 20 had grade 2 stress urinary incontinence. We compared the parameters of uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, urethral pressure profile, dynamic urethral function test, perineal ultrasound and stress urethral axis between grade 1 and 2 levels of stress urinanry incontience. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, parity or body mass index between the grade 1 and 2 patients. Uroflowmetry results showed that there were no significant differences in maximal flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume or residual urine between grade 1 and 2. As to cystometry results, only the first desire to void was significantly increased in grade 2 over 1 (304 ± 113.65 vs. 194 ± 48.24 [mL], P = .04). There were no significant differences in any of the urethral pressure profile parameters. In the dynamic test, the Valsalva leak point pressure and cough leak point pressure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in perineal ultrasound parameters or the stress urethral axis. CONCLUSION: Most stress urinary incontinence-related parameters showed no difference between the grade 1 and 2, and no urodynamic or ultrasonographic evidence for a difference between the grade 1 and 2 was demonstrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141680780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141680780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 718

EP - 722

JO - The Journal of reproductive medicine

JF - The Journal of reproductive medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 9

ER -