Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement in the Korean medical system

Hyosang Lee, Ui Chul Kim, Jae Keun Oh, Taehyun Kim, Sohee Park, Yoon Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective : This study is a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of cervical anterior interbody fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement, which are the main surgical methods to treat degenerative cervical disc disease. Methods : We analyzed 156 patients who underwent anterior cervical disc fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, diagnosed with degenerative cervical disc disorder. In this study, the costs and benefits were analyzed by using quality adjusted life year (QALY) as the outcome index for patients undergoing surgery, and a Markov model was used for the analysis. Only direct medical costs were included in the analysis; indirect medical costs were excluded. Data were analyzed with TreeAge Pro 2015™ (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA, USA). Results : Patients who underwent cervical anterior fusion had a total cost of KRW 2501807/USD 2357 over 5 years and obtained a utility of 3.72 QALY. Patients who underwent cervical artificial disc replacement received 4.18 QALY for a total of KRW 3685949/USD 3473 over 5 years. The cumulative cost-effectiveness ratio of cervical spine replacement surgery was KRW 2549511/QALY (USD 2402/QALY), which was lower than the general Korean payment standard. Conclusion : Both cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement are cost-effective treatments for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. Cervical artificial disc replacement may be an effective alternative to obtain more benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-89
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Total Disc Replacement
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Spine
Software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

@article{d39764466b6f45d3b486961335fb09ba,
title = "Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement in the Korean medical system",
abstract = "Objective : This study is a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of cervical anterior interbody fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement, which are the main surgical methods to treat degenerative cervical disc disease. Methods : We analyzed 156 patients who underwent anterior cervical disc fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, diagnosed with degenerative cervical disc disorder. In this study, the costs and benefits were analyzed by using quality adjusted life year (QALY) as the outcome index for patients undergoing surgery, and a Markov model was used for the analysis. Only direct medical costs were included in the analysis; indirect medical costs were excluded. Data were analyzed with TreeAge Pro 2015™ (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA, USA). Results : Patients who underwent cervical anterior fusion had a total cost of KRW 2501807/USD 2357 over 5 years and obtained a utility of 3.72 QALY. Patients who underwent cervical artificial disc replacement received 4.18 QALY for a total of KRW 3685949/USD 3473 over 5 years. The cumulative cost-effectiveness ratio of cervical spine replacement surgery was KRW 2549511/QALY (USD 2402/QALY), which was lower than the general Korean payment standard. Conclusion : Both cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement are cost-effective treatments for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. Cervical artificial disc replacement may be an effective alternative to obtain more benefits.",
author = "Hyosang Lee and Kim, {Ui Chul} and Oh, {Jae Keun} and Taehyun Kim and Sohee Park and Yoon Ha",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3340/jkns.2018.0076",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "83--89",
journal = "Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society",
issn = "2005-3711",
publisher = "Daehan sin'gyeong oe'gwa haghoe",
number = "1",

}

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement in the Korean medical system. / Lee, Hyosang; Kim, Ui Chul; Oh, Jae Keun; Kim, Taehyun; Park, Sohee; Ha, Yoon.

In: Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 83-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness analysis of cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement in the Korean medical system

AU - Lee, Hyosang

AU - Kim, Ui Chul

AU - Oh, Jae Keun

AU - Kim, Taehyun

AU - Park, Sohee

AU - Ha, Yoon

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective : This study is a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of cervical anterior interbody fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement, which are the main surgical methods to treat degenerative cervical disc disease. Methods : We analyzed 156 patients who underwent anterior cervical disc fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, diagnosed with degenerative cervical disc disorder. In this study, the costs and benefits were analyzed by using quality adjusted life year (QALY) as the outcome index for patients undergoing surgery, and a Markov model was used for the analysis. Only direct medical costs were included in the analysis; indirect medical costs were excluded. Data were analyzed with TreeAge Pro 2015™ (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA, USA). Results : Patients who underwent cervical anterior fusion had a total cost of KRW 2501807/USD 2357 over 5 years and obtained a utility of 3.72 QALY. Patients who underwent cervical artificial disc replacement received 4.18 QALY for a total of KRW 3685949/USD 3473 over 5 years. The cumulative cost-effectiveness ratio of cervical spine replacement surgery was KRW 2549511/QALY (USD 2402/QALY), which was lower than the general Korean payment standard. Conclusion : Both cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement are cost-effective treatments for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. Cervical artificial disc replacement may be an effective alternative to obtain more benefits.

AB - Objective : This study is a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of cervical anterior interbody fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement, which are the main surgical methods to treat degenerative cervical disc disease. Methods : We analyzed 156 patients who underwent anterior cervical disc fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, diagnosed with degenerative cervical disc disorder. In this study, the costs and benefits were analyzed by using quality adjusted life year (QALY) as the outcome index for patients undergoing surgery, and a Markov model was used for the analysis. Only direct medical costs were included in the analysis; indirect medical costs were excluded. Data were analyzed with TreeAge Pro 2015™ (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA, USA). Results : Patients who underwent cervical anterior fusion had a total cost of KRW 2501807/USD 2357 over 5 years and obtained a utility of 3.72 QALY. Patients who underwent cervical artificial disc replacement received 4.18 QALY for a total of KRW 3685949/USD 3473 over 5 years. The cumulative cost-effectiveness ratio of cervical spine replacement surgery was KRW 2549511/QALY (USD 2402/QALY), which was lower than the general Korean payment standard. Conclusion : Both cervical anterior fusion and cervical artificial disc replacement are cost-effective treatments for patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. Cervical artificial disc replacement may be an effective alternative to obtain more benefits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061896295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061896295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3340/jkns.2018.0076

DO - 10.3340/jkns.2018.0076

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 83

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

JF - Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

SN - 2005-3711

IS - 1

ER -