Crisis stability or general stability? Assessing Northeast Asia's absence of war and prospects for liberal transition

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is the relatively long peace of Northeast Asia a result of crisis stability or general stability? The article introduces two stability concepts - crisis and general stability. Crisis stability occurs when both sides in military crisis are so secure due to its military capability and are able to wait out a surprise attack fully confident that it would be able to respond with a punishing counter attack. On the other hand, general stability prevails when two powers greatly prefer peace even to a victorious war whether crisis stability exists or not, simply because war has become inconceivable as a means of solving any political disagreements and conflicts. While crisis stability entails delicate balance of military power from the deterrence literature of security studies, general stability bases its logic of inquiry on constructivism where the idea of war aversion - categorically rejecting war as a means to end conflicts - becomes the prevailing norm. Therefore, this article empirically examines how Northeast Asia has sustained its peace through crisis stability and presents a new trend toward general stability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-309
Number of pages23
JournalReview of International Studies
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jun 8

Fingerprint

peace
Military
constructivism
deterrence
trend
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{863e99e2a6974fc7a07aab6a4fea0681,
title = "Crisis stability or general stability? Assessing Northeast Asia's absence of war and prospects for liberal transition",
abstract = "Is the relatively long peace of Northeast Asia a result of crisis stability or general stability? The article introduces two stability concepts - crisis and general stability. Crisis stability occurs when both sides in military crisis are so secure due to its military capability and are able to wait out a surprise attack fully confident that it would be able to respond with a punishing counter attack. On the other hand, general stability prevails when two powers greatly prefer peace even to a victorious war whether crisis stability exists or not, simply because war has become inconceivable as a means of solving any political disagreements and conflicts. While crisis stability entails delicate balance of military power from the deterrence literature of security studies, general stability bases its logic of inquiry on constructivism where the idea of war aversion - categorically rejecting war as a means to end conflicts - becomes the prevailing norm. Therefore, this article empirically examines how Northeast Asia has sustained its peace through crisis stability and presents a new trend toward general stability.",
author = "Choi, {Jong Kun}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210515000170",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "287--309",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Crisis stability or general stability? Assessing Northeast Asia's absence of war and prospects for liberal transition. / Choi, Jong Kun.

In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 42, No. 2, 08.06.2015, p. 287-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crisis stability or general stability? Assessing Northeast Asia's absence of war and prospects for liberal transition

AU - Choi, Jong Kun

PY - 2015/6/8

Y1 - 2015/6/8

N2 - Is the relatively long peace of Northeast Asia a result of crisis stability or general stability? The article introduces two stability concepts - crisis and general stability. Crisis stability occurs when both sides in military crisis are so secure due to its military capability and are able to wait out a surprise attack fully confident that it would be able to respond with a punishing counter attack. On the other hand, general stability prevails when two powers greatly prefer peace even to a victorious war whether crisis stability exists or not, simply because war has become inconceivable as a means of solving any political disagreements and conflicts. While crisis stability entails delicate balance of military power from the deterrence literature of security studies, general stability bases its logic of inquiry on constructivism where the idea of war aversion - categorically rejecting war as a means to end conflicts - becomes the prevailing norm. Therefore, this article empirically examines how Northeast Asia has sustained its peace through crisis stability and presents a new trend toward general stability.

AB - Is the relatively long peace of Northeast Asia a result of crisis stability or general stability? The article introduces two stability concepts - crisis and general stability. Crisis stability occurs when both sides in military crisis are so secure due to its military capability and are able to wait out a surprise attack fully confident that it would be able to respond with a punishing counter attack. On the other hand, general stability prevails when two powers greatly prefer peace even to a victorious war whether crisis stability exists or not, simply because war has become inconceivable as a means of solving any political disagreements and conflicts. While crisis stability entails delicate balance of military power from the deterrence literature of security studies, general stability bases its logic of inquiry on constructivism where the idea of war aversion - categorically rejecting war as a means to end conflicts - becomes the prevailing norm. Therefore, this article empirically examines how Northeast Asia has sustained its peace through crisis stability and presents a new trend toward general stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960397794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960397794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0260210515000170

DO - 10.1017/S0260210515000170

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84960397794

VL - 42

SP - 287

EP - 309

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

IS - 2

ER -