Critical commentary advancing the science of social work: The case for biosocial research

Brandy R. Maynard, Brian B. Boutwell, Michael G. Vaughn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social workers have long advocated for using a biopsychosocial model for social work practice. Although the biopsychosocial framework to understanding and treating problems is ubiquitous to social work practice, the biological domain has historically been neglected. In recent years, however, social work practitioners and scholars have begun to embrace findings from biosocial research to inform theory and practice. Despite the emerging use of findings from biosocial research studies in social work, the discipline of social work seems slow to employ biosocial research designs to contribute new knowledge. This critical commentary discusses the importance of biosocial research to social work, explores the reluctance and barriers to more fully incorporating biosocial research designs, and argues for the social work research community to set an active biosocial research agenda so that we may contribute in a scientific way to testing and refining all aspects of the biopsychosocial framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1572-1586
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 1

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critical commentary advancing the science of social work: The case for biosocial research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this