Culturally sensitive interventions and substance use: A meta-analytic review of outcomes among minority youths

David R. Hodge, Kelly F. Jackson, Michael G. Vaughn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of culturally sensitive interventions (CSIs) (N = 10) designed to address substance use among minority youths. Study methods consisted of systematic search procedures, quality of study ratings, and meta-analytic techniques to gauge effects and evaluate publication bias. The results, across all measures and time frames, reveal small effects (Hedges's g = .118, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.004 to 0.232). For recent alcohol use, the effects were small (Hedges's g = .225, 95% CI = 0.015 to 0.435). For recent marijuana use, the effects failed to achieve significance (Hedges's g = .610, 95% CI = -0.256 to 1.476). Suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of CSIs are discussed along with the benefits and limitations of using meta-analyses versus narrative reviews to assess intervention effectiveness in emerging areas of research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Work Research
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Mar 1

Fingerprint

minority
confidence
rating
alcohol
narrative
trend
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{bed7888910ce40688af72cd2a800389f,
title = "Culturally sensitive interventions and substance use: A meta-analytic review of outcomes among minority youths",
abstract = "This study assessed the effectiveness of culturally sensitive interventions (CSIs) (N = 10) designed to address substance use among minority youths. Study methods consisted of systematic search procedures, quality of study ratings, and meta-analytic techniques to gauge effects and evaluate publication bias. The results, across all measures and time frames, reveal small effects (Hedges's g = .118, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.004 to 0.232). For recent alcohol use, the effects were small (Hedges's g = .225, 95{\%} CI = 0.015 to 0.435). For recent marijuana use, the effects failed to achieve significance (Hedges's g = .610, 95{\%} CI = -0.256 to 1.476). Suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of CSIs are discussed along with the benefits and limitations of using meta-analyses versus narrative reviews to assess intervention effectiveness in emerging areas of research.",
author = "Hodge, {David R.} and Jackson, {Kelly F.} and Vaughn, {Michael G.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/swr/svs008",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "11--19",
journal = "Social Work Research",
issn = "1070-5309",
publisher = "National Association of Social Workers",
number = "1",

}

Culturally sensitive interventions and substance use : A meta-analytic review of outcomes among minority youths. / Hodge, David R.; Jackson, Kelly F.; Vaughn, Michael G.

In: Social Work Research, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 11-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Culturally sensitive interventions and substance use

T2 - A meta-analytic review of outcomes among minority youths

AU - Hodge, David R.

AU - Jackson, Kelly F.

AU - Vaughn, Michael G.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - This study assessed the effectiveness of culturally sensitive interventions (CSIs) (N = 10) designed to address substance use among minority youths. Study methods consisted of systematic search procedures, quality of study ratings, and meta-analytic techniques to gauge effects and evaluate publication bias. The results, across all measures and time frames, reveal small effects (Hedges's g = .118, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.004 to 0.232). For recent alcohol use, the effects were small (Hedges's g = .225, 95% CI = 0.015 to 0.435). For recent marijuana use, the effects failed to achieve significance (Hedges's g = .610, 95% CI = -0.256 to 1.476). Suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of CSIs are discussed along with the benefits and limitations of using meta-analyses versus narrative reviews to assess intervention effectiveness in emerging areas of research.

AB - This study assessed the effectiveness of culturally sensitive interventions (CSIs) (N = 10) designed to address substance use among minority youths. Study methods consisted of systematic search procedures, quality of study ratings, and meta-analytic techniques to gauge effects and evaluate publication bias. The results, across all measures and time frames, reveal small effects (Hedges's g = .118, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.004 to 0.232). For recent alcohol use, the effects were small (Hedges's g = .225, 95% CI = 0.015 to 0.435). For recent marijuana use, the effects failed to achieve significance (Hedges's g = .610, 95% CI = -0.256 to 1.476). Suggestions for enhancing the effectiveness of CSIs are discussed along with the benefits and limitations of using meta-analyses versus narrative reviews to assess intervention effectiveness in emerging areas of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866429001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866429001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/swr/svs008

DO - 10.1093/swr/svs008

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84866429001

VL - 36

SP - 11

EP - 19

JO - Social Work Research

JF - Social Work Research

SN - 1070-5309

IS - 1

ER -