Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients

Yoo Seob Shin, Jung Won Park, Yong Won Lee, Cheol Woo Kim, Hun Jong Dhong, Hae Sim Park, Young Joo Cho, Sang Heon Cho, Bok Yang Pyun, Kwang Hoon Lee, Hae Ran Lee, Chein Soo Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, compliance, pattern of use, and economic cost of OM in Korean allergy patients. Methods: A total of 647 allergy patients were enrolled from 10 general hospitals, and were surveyed by the questionnaire. It consisted of 12 items and regarded the prescription rates, reasons for referring, their opinions for the efficacy of OM, and economic costs. Results: A total of 259 (40.5%) patients had used OM, and 35.5% of these patients experienced two or more kinds of these practices. A patients' income or education level did not affect the prescription rates of OM. Of the patients that used OM, 34.6% of them were satisfied with the effect of OM treatment, and 40.9% of them were inclined to continue with their OM treatments. The most frequent reasons for choosing OM were the patient's belief that OM can predispose 'allergic constitution to normal' (30.2%), worries about the possible adverse reactions of the long-term administration of the proven drugs (20.2%), and the safety of OM (15.6%). However, 18.9% of these patients experienced perceived adverse events to their OM treatment such as skin rashes, gastrointestinal discomfort, and hepatitis. The patients that have used OM spent on average $ 915 US dollars annually for OM treatment. Conclusions: Many Korean allergy patients are cliental to OM. Some patients experienced a satisfactory treatment effect from OM, however, others had no treatment effect, even adverse event. Therefore, it is important to educate people to use OM appropriately to make harmony with modern medicine.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-104
Number of pages6
JournalPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan 1

Fingerprint

East Asian Traditional Medicine
Hypersensitivity
Prescriptions
Therapeutics
Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Modern 1601-history
Constitution and Bylaws
Exanthema
General Hospitals
Hepatitis
Compliance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Shin, Y. S., Park, J. W., Lee, Y. W., Kim, C. W., Dhong, H. J., Park, H. S., ... Hong, C. S. (2011). Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 20(1), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1947
Shin, Yoo Seob ; Park, Jung Won ; Lee, Yong Won ; Kim, Cheol Woo ; Dhong, Hun Jong ; Park, Hae Sim ; Cho, Young Joo ; Cho, Sang Heon ; Pyun, Bok Yang ; Lee, Kwang Hoon ; Lee, Hae Ran ; Hong, Chein Soo. / Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients. In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 99-104.
@article{a0d783276aaf4f7082c31a84ce1c74a6,
title = "Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, compliance, pattern of use, and economic cost of OM in Korean allergy patients. Methods: A total of 647 allergy patients were enrolled from 10 general hospitals, and were surveyed by the questionnaire. It consisted of 12 items and regarded the prescription rates, reasons for referring, their opinions for the efficacy of OM, and economic costs. Results: A total of 259 (40.5{\%}) patients had used OM, and 35.5{\%} of these patients experienced two or more kinds of these practices. A patients' income or education level did not affect the prescription rates of OM. Of the patients that used OM, 34.6{\%} of them were satisfied with the effect of OM treatment, and 40.9{\%} of them were inclined to continue with their OM treatments. The most frequent reasons for choosing OM were the patient's belief that OM can predispose 'allergic constitution to normal' (30.2{\%}), worries about the possible adverse reactions of the long-term administration of the proven drugs (20.2{\%}), and the safety of OM (15.6{\%}). However, 18.9{\%} of these patients experienced perceived adverse events to their OM treatment such as skin rashes, gastrointestinal discomfort, and hepatitis. The patients that have used OM spent on average $ 915 US dollars annually for OM treatment. Conclusions: Many Korean allergy patients are cliental to OM. Some patients experienced a satisfactory treatment effect from OM, however, others had no treatment effect, even adverse event. Therefore, it is important to educate people to use OM appropriately to make harmony with modern medicine.",
author = "Shin, {Yoo Seob} and Park, {Jung Won} and Lee, {Yong Won} and Kim, {Cheol Woo} and Dhong, {Hun Jong} and Park, {Hae Sim} and Cho, {Young Joo} and Cho, {Sang Heon} and Pyun, {Bok Yang} and Lee, {Kwang Hoon} and Lee, {Hae Ran} and Hong, {Chein Soo}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pds.1947",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "99--104",
journal = "Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety",
issn = "1053-8569",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Shin, YS, Park, JW, Lee, YW, Kim, CW, Dhong, HJ, Park, HS, Cho, YJ, Cho, SH, Pyun, BY, Lee, KH, Lee, HR & Hong, CS 2011, 'Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients', Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1947

Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients. / Shin, Yoo Seob; Park, Jung Won; Lee, Yong Won; Kim, Cheol Woo; Dhong, Hun Jong; Park, Hae Sim; Cho, Young Joo; Cho, Sang Heon; Pyun, Bok Yang; Lee, Kwang Hoon; Lee, Hae Ran; Hong, Chein Soo.

In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 99-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of oriental medicine in treating Korean allergy patients

AU - Shin, Yoo Seob

AU - Park, Jung Won

AU - Lee, Yong Won

AU - Kim, Cheol Woo

AU - Dhong, Hun Jong

AU - Park, Hae Sim

AU - Cho, Young Joo

AU - Cho, Sang Heon

AU - Pyun, Bok Yang

AU - Lee, Kwang Hoon

AU - Lee, Hae Ran

AU - Hong, Chein Soo

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, compliance, pattern of use, and economic cost of OM in Korean allergy patients. Methods: A total of 647 allergy patients were enrolled from 10 general hospitals, and were surveyed by the questionnaire. It consisted of 12 items and regarded the prescription rates, reasons for referring, their opinions for the efficacy of OM, and economic costs. Results: A total of 259 (40.5%) patients had used OM, and 35.5% of these patients experienced two or more kinds of these practices. A patients' income or education level did not affect the prescription rates of OM. Of the patients that used OM, 34.6% of them were satisfied with the effect of OM treatment, and 40.9% of them were inclined to continue with their OM treatments. The most frequent reasons for choosing OM were the patient's belief that OM can predispose 'allergic constitution to normal' (30.2%), worries about the possible adverse reactions of the long-term administration of the proven drugs (20.2%), and the safety of OM (15.6%). However, 18.9% of these patients experienced perceived adverse events to their OM treatment such as skin rashes, gastrointestinal discomfort, and hepatitis. The patients that have used OM spent on average $ 915 US dollars annually for OM treatment. Conclusions: Many Korean allergy patients are cliental to OM. Some patients experienced a satisfactory treatment effect from OM, however, others had no treatment effect, even adverse event. Therefore, it is important to educate people to use OM appropriately to make harmony with modern medicine.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence, compliance, pattern of use, and economic cost of OM in Korean allergy patients. Methods: A total of 647 allergy patients were enrolled from 10 general hospitals, and were surveyed by the questionnaire. It consisted of 12 items and regarded the prescription rates, reasons for referring, their opinions for the efficacy of OM, and economic costs. Results: A total of 259 (40.5%) patients had used OM, and 35.5% of these patients experienced two or more kinds of these practices. A patients' income or education level did not affect the prescription rates of OM. Of the patients that used OM, 34.6% of them were satisfied with the effect of OM treatment, and 40.9% of them were inclined to continue with their OM treatments. The most frequent reasons for choosing OM were the patient's belief that OM can predispose 'allergic constitution to normal' (30.2%), worries about the possible adverse reactions of the long-term administration of the proven drugs (20.2%), and the safety of OM (15.6%). However, 18.9% of these patients experienced perceived adverse events to their OM treatment such as skin rashes, gastrointestinal discomfort, and hepatitis. The patients that have used OM spent on average $ 915 US dollars annually for OM treatment. Conclusions: Many Korean allergy patients are cliental to OM. Some patients experienced a satisfactory treatment effect from OM, however, others had no treatment effect, even adverse event. Therefore, it is important to educate people to use OM appropriately to make harmony with modern medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650340742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650340742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pds.1947

DO - 10.1002/pds.1947

M3 - Article

C2 - 20575103

AN - SCOPUS:78650340742

VL - 20

SP - 99

EP - 104

JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

SN - 1053-8569

IS - 1

ER -