Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: How does it compare with other surgical approaches?

Sey Kiat Lim, Kwang Hyun Kim, Tae Young Shin, Koon Ho Rha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim was to review the current status and evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in comparison with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2008 and June 2012, published English language comparative studies comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with either open radical postatectomy and/or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were reviewed. End-points for this review include oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes, and complications. Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and/or open radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offered at least equivalent oncological control. Current evidence seems to suggest a superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy over open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in terms of functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and potency. Risks of perioperative complications were also low after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers at least equivalent oncological and functional outcomes with low risks of complications when compared with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence available in current literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-284
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Urology
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

@article{985426aefc494934aa298bf1ea93b0bc,
title = "Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: How does it compare with other surgical approaches?",
abstract = "The aim was to review the current status and evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in comparison with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2008 and June 2012, published English language comparative studies comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with either open radical postatectomy and/or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were reviewed. End-points for this review include oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes, and complications. Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and/or open radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offered at least equivalent oncological control. Current evidence seems to suggest a superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy over open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in terms of functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and potency. Risks of perioperative complications were also low after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers at least equivalent oncological and functional outcomes with low risks of complications when compared with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence available in current literature.",
author = "Lim, {Sey Kiat} and Kim, {Kwang Hyun} and Shin, {Tae Young} and Rha, {Koon Ho}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "271--284",
journal = "International Journal of Urology",
issn = "0919-8172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : How does it compare with other surgical approaches? / Lim, Sey Kiat; Kim, Kwang Hyun; Shin, Tae Young; Rha, Koon Ho.

In: International Journal of Urology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 271-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

T2 - How does it compare with other surgical approaches?

AU - Lim, Sey Kiat

AU - Kim, Kwang Hyun

AU - Shin, Tae Young

AU - Rha, Koon Ho

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - The aim was to review the current status and evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in comparison with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2008 and June 2012, published English language comparative studies comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with either open radical postatectomy and/or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were reviewed. End-points for this review include oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes, and complications. Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and/or open radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offered at least equivalent oncological control. Current evidence seems to suggest a superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy over open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in terms of functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and potency. Risks of perioperative complications were also low after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers at least equivalent oncological and functional outcomes with low risks of complications when compared with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence available in current literature.

AB - The aim was to review the current status and evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in comparison with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2008 and June 2012, published English language comparative studies comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with either open radical postatectomy and/or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were reviewed. End-points for this review include oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes, and complications. Compared with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and/or open radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offered at least equivalent oncological control. Current evidence seems to suggest a superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy over open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in terms of functional outcomes, such as urinary continence and potency. Risks of perioperative complications were also low after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy offers at least equivalent oncological and functional outcomes with low risks of complications when compared with open radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. However, there is a paucity of high-level evidence available in current literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874541996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874541996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23106163

AN - SCOPUS:84874541996

VL - 20

SP - 271

EP - 284

JO - International Journal of Urology

JF - International Journal of Urology

SN - 0919-8172

IS - 3

ER -