Damage over Outcome: How Interstate Wars Affect Civil War Likelihood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-247
Number of pages27
Journal국제관계연구
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec 21

Fingerprint

civil war
damages
logistics
leader
death

Cite this

@article{019c630c6029453bb859d94952a5df3c,
title = "Damage over Outcome: How Interstate Wars Affect Civil War Likelihood",
abstract = "What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.",
author = "Taehee Whang",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.18031",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "221--247",
journal = "국제관계연구",
issn = "1738-0154",
number = "2",

}

Damage over Outcome : How Interstate Wars Affect Civil War Likelihood. / Whang, Taehee.

In: 국제관계연구 , Vol. 21, No. 2, 21.12.2016, p. 221-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Damage over Outcome

T2 - How Interstate Wars Affect Civil War Likelihood

AU - Whang, Taehee

PY - 2016/12/21

Y1 - 2016/12/21

N2 - What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.

AB - What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.

U2 - 10.18031

DO - 10.18031

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 221

EP - 247

JO - 국제관계연구

JF - 국제관계연구

SN - 1738-0154

IS - 2

ER -