DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case

Colin M. Zarzycki, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Kevin A. Reed, Paul A. Ullrich, David M. Hall, Mark A. Taylor, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Christian Kühnlein, Robert Walko, Vivian LeeAbdessamad Qaddouri, Monique Tanguay, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, Ryuji Yoshida, Sang Hun Park, Joseph B. Klemp, William C. Skamarock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)879-892
Number of pages14
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Mar 5

Fingerprint

supercell
Model
Converge
physics
plume
perturbation
test
Testbed
Categorical or nominal
Refinement
Horizontal
Physics
Discretization
Radius
Perturbation
Imply
simulation
Evaluation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Zarzycki, C. M., Jablonowski, C., Kent, J., Lauritzen, P. H., Nair, R., Reed, K. A., ... Skamarock, W. C. (2019). DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case. Geoscientific Model Development, 12(3), 879-892. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019
Zarzycki, Colin M. ; Jablonowski, Christiane ; Kent, James ; Lauritzen, Peter H. ; Nair, Ramachandran ; Reed, Kevin A. ; Ullrich, Paul A. ; Hall, David M. ; Taylor, Mark A. ; Dazlich, Don ; Heikes, Ross ; Konor, Celal ; Randall, David ; Chen, Xi ; Harris, Lucas ; Giorgetta, Marco ; Reinert, Daniel ; Kühnlein, Christian ; Walko, Robert ; Lee, Vivian ; Qaddouri, Abdessamad ; Tanguay, Monique ; Miura, Hiroaki ; Ohno, Tomoki ; Yoshida, Ryuji ; Park, Sang Hun ; Klemp, Joseph B. ; Skamarock, William C. / DCMIP2016 : The splitting supercell test case. In: Geoscientific Model Development. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 879-892.
@article{252c5e7da2f94885ae713799b0e69400,
title = "DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case",
abstract = "This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.",
author = "Zarzycki, {Colin M.} and Christiane Jablonowski and James Kent and Lauritzen, {Peter H.} and Ramachandran Nair and Reed, {Kevin A.} and Ullrich, {Paul A.} and Hall, {David M.} and Taylor, {Mark A.} and Don Dazlich and Ross Heikes and Celal Konor and David Randall and Xi Chen and Lucas Harris and Marco Giorgetta and Daniel Reinert and Christian K{\"u}hnlein and Robert Walko and Vivian Lee and Abdessamad Qaddouri and Monique Tanguay and Hiroaki Miura and Tomoki Ohno and Ryuji Yoshida and Park, {Sang Hun} and Klemp, {Joseph B.} and Skamarock, {William C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "879--892",
journal = "Geoscientific Model Development",
issn = "1991-959X",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "3",

}

Zarzycki, CM, Jablonowski, C, Kent, J, Lauritzen, PH, Nair, R, Reed, KA, Ullrich, PA, Hall, DM, Taylor, MA, Dazlich, D, Heikes, R, Konor, C, Randall, D, Chen, X, Harris, L, Giorgetta, M, Reinert, D, Kühnlein, C, Walko, R, Lee, V, Qaddouri, A, Tanguay, M, Miura, H, Ohno, T, Yoshida, R, Park, SH, Klemp, JB & Skamarock, WC 2019, 'DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case', Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 879-892. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019

DCMIP2016 : The splitting supercell test case. / Zarzycki, Colin M.; Jablonowski, Christiane; Kent, James; Lauritzen, Peter H.; Nair, Ramachandran; Reed, Kevin A.; Ullrich, Paul A.; Hall, David M.; Taylor, Mark A.; Dazlich, Don; Heikes, Ross; Konor, Celal; Randall, David; Chen, Xi; Harris, Lucas; Giorgetta, Marco; Reinert, Daniel; Kühnlein, Christian; Walko, Robert; Lee, Vivian; Qaddouri, Abdessamad; Tanguay, Monique; Miura, Hiroaki; Ohno, Tomoki; Yoshida, Ryuji; Park, Sang Hun; Klemp, Joseph B.; Skamarock, William C.

In: Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, No. 3, 05.03.2019, p. 879-892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - DCMIP2016

T2 - The splitting supercell test case

AU - Zarzycki, Colin M.

AU - Jablonowski, Christiane

AU - Kent, James

AU - Lauritzen, Peter H.

AU - Nair, Ramachandran

AU - Reed, Kevin A.

AU - Ullrich, Paul A.

AU - Hall, David M.

AU - Taylor, Mark A.

AU - Dazlich, Don

AU - Heikes, Ross

AU - Konor, Celal

AU - Randall, David

AU - Chen, Xi

AU - Harris, Lucas

AU - Giorgetta, Marco

AU - Reinert, Daniel

AU - Kühnlein, Christian

AU - Walko, Robert

AU - Lee, Vivian

AU - Qaddouri, Abdessamad

AU - Tanguay, Monique

AU - Miura, Hiroaki

AU - Ohno, Tomoki

AU - Yoshida, Ryuji

AU - Park, Sang Hun

AU - Klemp, Joseph B.

AU - Skamarock, William C.

PY - 2019/3/5

Y1 - 2019/3/5

N2 - This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.

AB - This paper describes the splitting supercell idealized test case used in the 2016 Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP2016). These storms are useful test beds for global atmospheric models because the horizontal scale of convective plumes is O(1 km), emphasizing non-hydrostatic dynamics. The test case simulates a supercell on a reduced-radius sphere with nominal resolutions ranging from 4 to 0.5 km and is based on the work of Klemp et al. (2015). Models are initialized with an atmospheric environment conducive to supercell formation and forced with a small thermal perturbation. A simplified Kessler microphysics scheme is coupled to the dynamical core to represent moist processes. Reference solutions for DCMIP2016 models are presented. Storm evolution is broadly similar between models, although differences in the final solution exist. These differences are hypothesized to result from different numerical discretizations, physics-dynamics coupling, and numerical diffusion. Intramodel solutions generally converge as models approach 0.5 km resolution, although exploratory simulations at 0.25 km imply some dynamical cores require more refinement to fully converge. These results can be used as a reference for future dynamical core evaluation, particularly with the development of non-hydrostatic global models intended to be used in convective-permitting regimes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062564133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062564133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019

DO - 10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062564133

VL - 12

SP - 879

EP - 892

JO - Geoscientific Model Development

JF - Geoscientific Model Development

SN - 1991-959X

IS - 3

ER -

Zarzycki CM, Jablonowski C, Kent J, Lauritzen PH, Nair R, Reed KA et al. DCMIP2016: The splitting supercell test case. Geoscientific Model Development. 2019 Mar 5;12(3):879-892. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-879-2019