Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual severe-to-profound hearing loss

Won Sun Yang, InSeok Moon, Hee Nam Kim, Won Sang Lee, Sung Eun Lee, Jae Young Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the results of late cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf patients with significant residual hearing loss and to evaluate patient factors relevant to postoperative auditory outcomes in this patient group. Study Design: Analysis of results of cochlear implantation using postoperative speech perception test scores per each condition. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty-two subjects with severe to profound hearing loss that developed before the age of 4. Interventions: Subjects were implanted at a mean age of 24.8 years (range, 16-44) with Nucleus CI24 (n = 18, 56%), ClarionHiRes 90K(n=11, 34%), and MedelPULSA(n=3,10%) device. Details of etiology, duration of deafness, hearing aid history, hearing thresholds before operation, communication mode, and educational environment were investigated. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months after the operation. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative speech perception test scores between different options within patient group. Results: The results showed significant improvement in open set speech perception (sentence) scores after the implantation (mean scores from 7.0 to 46.7, p < 0.05). Preoperative hearing of better ear and preoperative speech perception scores correlated with postoperative performances (r = j0.70 and r = 0.46, respectively, p < 0.05). Education and communication mode were also closely related to postoperative performances. In the group with poorer performances, preoperative hearing thresholds were significantly worse than those with better performances, and a larger portion of those patients attended special schools and used sign language. Conclusion: We found that residual auditory capacity in the better ear is an important factor in predicting outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with prelingual hearing loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-228
Number of pages6
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implantation
Hearing Loss
Speech Perception
Hearing
Ear
Communication
Sign Language
Hearing Aids
Deafness
Tertiary Care Centers
History
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education
Equipment and Supplies

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Yang, Won Sun ; Moon, InSeok ; Kim, Hee Nam ; Lee, Won Sang ; Lee, Sung Eun ; Choi, Jae Young. / Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual severe-to-profound hearing loss. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 223-228.
@article{92a68fc490e244be9625d42deae3aa41,
title = "Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual severe-to-profound hearing loss",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate the results of late cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf patients with significant residual hearing loss and to evaluate patient factors relevant to postoperative auditory outcomes in this patient group. Study Design: Analysis of results of cochlear implantation using postoperative speech perception test scores per each condition. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty-two subjects with severe to profound hearing loss that developed before the age of 4. Interventions: Subjects were implanted at a mean age of 24.8 years (range, 16-44) with Nucleus CI24 (n = 18, 56{\%}), ClarionHiRes 90K(n=11, 34{\%}), and MedelPULSA(n=3,10{\%}) device. Details of etiology, duration of deafness, hearing aid history, hearing thresholds before operation, communication mode, and educational environment were investigated. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months after the operation. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative speech perception test scores between different options within patient group. Results: The results showed significant improvement in open set speech perception (sentence) scores after the implantation (mean scores from 7.0 to 46.7, p < 0.05). Preoperative hearing of better ear and preoperative speech perception scores correlated with postoperative performances (r = j0.70 and r = 0.46, respectively, p < 0.05). Education and communication mode were also closely related to postoperative performances. In the group with poorer performances, preoperative hearing thresholds were significantly worse than those with better performances, and a larger portion of those patients attended special schools and used sign language. Conclusion: We found that residual auditory capacity in the better ear is an important factor in predicting outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with prelingual hearing loss.",
author = "Yang, {Won Sun} and InSeok Moon and Kim, {Hee Nam} and Lee, {Won Sang} and Lee, {Sung Eun} and Choi, {Jae Young}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182040db7",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "223--228",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual severe-to-profound hearing loss. / Yang, Won Sun; Moon, InSeok; Kim, Hee Nam; Lee, Won Sang; Lee, Sung Eun; Choi, Jae Young.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 223-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual severe-to-profound hearing loss

AU - Yang, Won Sun

AU - Moon, InSeok

AU - Kim, Hee Nam

AU - Lee, Won Sang

AU - Lee, Sung Eun

AU - Choi, Jae Young

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate the results of late cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf patients with significant residual hearing loss and to evaluate patient factors relevant to postoperative auditory outcomes in this patient group. Study Design: Analysis of results of cochlear implantation using postoperative speech perception test scores per each condition. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty-two subjects with severe to profound hearing loss that developed before the age of 4. Interventions: Subjects were implanted at a mean age of 24.8 years (range, 16-44) with Nucleus CI24 (n = 18, 56%), ClarionHiRes 90K(n=11, 34%), and MedelPULSA(n=3,10%) device. Details of etiology, duration of deafness, hearing aid history, hearing thresholds before operation, communication mode, and educational environment were investigated. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months after the operation. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative speech perception test scores between different options within patient group. Results: The results showed significant improvement in open set speech perception (sentence) scores after the implantation (mean scores from 7.0 to 46.7, p < 0.05). Preoperative hearing of better ear and preoperative speech perception scores correlated with postoperative performances (r = j0.70 and r = 0.46, respectively, p < 0.05). Education and communication mode were also closely related to postoperative performances. In the group with poorer performances, preoperative hearing thresholds were significantly worse than those with better performances, and a larger portion of those patients attended special schools and used sign language. Conclusion: We found that residual auditory capacity in the better ear is an important factor in predicting outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with prelingual hearing loss.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate the results of late cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf patients with significant residual hearing loss and to evaluate patient factors relevant to postoperative auditory outcomes in this patient group. Study Design: Analysis of results of cochlear implantation using postoperative speech perception test scores per each condition. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty-two subjects with severe to profound hearing loss that developed before the age of 4. Interventions: Subjects were implanted at a mean age of 24.8 years (range, 16-44) with Nucleus CI24 (n = 18, 56%), ClarionHiRes 90K(n=11, 34%), and MedelPULSA(n=3,10%) device. Details of etiology, duration of deafness, hearing aid history, hearing thresholds before operation, communication mode, and educational environment were investigated. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months after the operation. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative speech perception test scores between different options within patient group. Results: The results showed significant improvement in open set speech perception (sentence) scores after the implantation (mean scores from 7.0 to 46.7, p < 0.05). Preoperative hearing of better ear and preoperative speech perception scores correlated with postoperative performances (r = j0.70 and r = 0.46, respectively, p < 0.05). Education and communication mode were also closely related to postoperative performances. In the group with poorer performances, preoperative hearing thresholds were significantly worse than those with better performances, and a larger portion of those patients attended special schools and used sign language. Conclusion: We found that residual auditory capacity in the better ear is an important factor in predicting outcomes after cochlear implantation in patients with prelingual hearing loss.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955674233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955674233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182040db7

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182040db7

M3 - Article

C2 - 21150681

AN - SCOPUS:79955674233

VL - 32

SP - 223

EP - 228

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 2

ER -