Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, Raymond Eid, Taeyoung Park, Robert Y. Rhee, Ghassan Abu-Hamad, Edith Tzeng, Michel S. Makaroun, Jae Sung Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain a concern. Most are simple catheter-based procedures, but in some instances, open conversions (OCs) are required and carry a worse outcome. We reviewed our experience to characterize these OCs. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent an OC after a previous EVAR for an aneurysm-related indication from 2001 to 2010. Clinical outcomes are reported. Results: Data were reviewed for 44 patients (77% men) with a mean age of 74 years (range, 55-90 years). The average time from EVAR to the first OC was 45 months (range, 2-190 months). In six patients (14%), the initial EVAR was at another institution. The endografts used were Ancure in 16, Excluder in 13, AneuRx in eight, Zenith in three, Lifepath in one, Renu in one, and undetermined in two. Twenty-two patients had previously undergone a total of 32 endovascular reinterventions before their index OC. Indications for OC were aneurysm expansion in 28 (64%), rupture in 12 (27%), and infection in four (9%). The endograft was preserved in situ in 10 patients (23%). Explantation was partial in 18 (41%) or complete in 16 (36%). Endograft preservation was used for type II endoleak in all but one patient by selective ligation of the culprit arteries (lumbar in four, inferior mesenteric artery in five, and middle sacral in one). Proximal neck banding was performed in one type Ia endoleak. Overall morbidity was 55%, and mortality was 18%. No deaths occurred in a subgroup of patients who underwent endograft preservation with selective ligation of culprit vessels for type II endoleak. Intraoperative complications included bowel injury in two, bleeding in two, splenectomy in one, and ureteral injury in one. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, two patients underwent additional procedures after the index OC: one after endograft preservation and one after partial explantation. None of the patients who underwent elective OC with endograft preservation required subsequent endograft explantation. Conclusions: Most OCs after EVAR are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, except when electively treating an isolated type II endoleak with ligation of branches and preservation of the endograft.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1562-1569.e1
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Endoleak
Ligation
Inferior Mesenteric Artery
Morbidity
Mortality
Intraoperative Complications
Wounds and Injuries
Splenectomy
Rupture
Catheters
Arteries
Hemorrhage
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Chaar, C. I. O., Eid, R., Park, T., Rhee, R. Y., Abu-Hamad, G., Tzeng, E., ... Cho, J. S. (2012). Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 55(6), 1562-1569.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.007
Chaar, Cassius Iyad Ochoa ; Eid, Raymond ; Park, Taeyoung ; Rhee, Robert Y. ; Abu-Hamad, Ghassan ; Tzeng, Edith ; Makaroun, Michel S. ; Cho, Jae Sung. / Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 1562-1569.e1.
@article{35e083ea7dd2491e85f7f9fe779fa1b2,
title = "Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair",
abstract = "Objective: Secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain a concern. Most are simple catheter-based procedures, but in some instances, open conversions (OCs) are required and carry a worse outcome. We reviewed our experience to characterize these OCs. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent an OC after a previous EVAR for an aneurysm-related indication from 2001 to 2010. Clinical outcomes are reported. Results: Data were reviewed for 44 patients (77{\%} men) with a mean age of 74 years (range, 55-90 years). The average time from EVAR to the first OC was 45 months (range, 2-190 months). In six patients (14{\%}), the initial EVAR was at another institution. The endografts used were Ancure in 16, Excluder in 13, AneuRx in eight, Zenith in three, Lifepath in one, Renu in one, and undetermined in two. Twenty-two patients had previously undergone a total of 32 endovascular reinterventions before their index OC. Indications for OC were aneurysm expansion in 28 (64{\%}), rupture in 12 (27{\%}), and infection in four (9{\%}). The endograft was preserved in situ in 10 patients (23{\%}). Explantation was partial in 18 (41{\%}) or complete in 16 (36{\%}). Endograft preservation was used for type II endoleak in all but one patient by selective ligation of the culprit arteries (lumbar in four, inferior mesenteric artery in five, and middle sacral in one). Proximal neck banding was performed in one type Ia endoleak. Overall morbidity was 55{\%}, and mortality was 18{\%}. No deaths occurred in a subgroup of patients who underwent endograft preservation with selective ligation of culprit vessels for type II endoleak. Intraoperative complications included bowel injury in two, bleeding in two, splenectomy in one, and ureteral injury in one. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, two patients underwent additional procedures after the index OC: one after endograft preservation and one after partial explantation. None of the patients who underwent elective OC with endograft preservation required subsequent endograft explantation. Conclusions: Most OCs after EVAR are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, except when electively treating an isolated type II endoleak with ligation of branches and preservation of the endograft.",
author = "Chaar, {Cassius Iyad Ochoa} and Raymond Eid and Taeyoung Park and Rhee, {Robert Y.} and Ghassan Abu-Hamad and Edith Tzeng and Makaroun, {Michel S.} and Cho, {Jae Sung}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "1562--1569.e1",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Chaar, CIO, Eid, R, Park, T, Rhee, RY, Abu-Hamad, G, Tzeng, E, Makaroun, MS & Cho, JS 2012, 'Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1562-1569.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.007

Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. / Chaar, Cassius Iyad Ochoa; Eid, Raymond; Park, Taeyoung; Rhee, Robert Y.; Abu-Hamad, Ghassan; Tzeng, Edith; Makaroun, Michel S.; Cho, Jae Sung.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 55, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1562-1569.e1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delayed open conversions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

AU - Chaar, Cassius Iyad Ochoa

AU - Eid, Raymond

AU - Park, Taeyoung

AU - Rhee, Robert Y.

AU - Abu-Hamad, Ghassan

AU - Tzeng, Edith

AU - Makaroun, Michel S.

AU - Cho, Jae Sung

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Objective: Secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain a concern. Most are simple catheter-based procedures, but in some instances, open conversions (OCs) are required and carry a worse outcome. We reviewed our experience to characterize these OCs. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent an OC after a previous EVAR for an aneurysm-related indication from 2001 to 2010. Clinical outcomes are reported. Results: Data were reviewed for 44 patients (77% men) with a mean age of 74 years (range, 55-90 years). The average time from EVAR to the first OC was 45 months (range, 2-190 months). In six patients (14%), the initial EVAR was at another institution. The endografts used were Ancure in 16, Excluder in 13, AneuRx in eight, Zenith in three, Lifepath in one, Renu in one, and undetermined in two. Twenty-two patients had previously undergone a total of 32 endovascular reinterventions before their index OC. Indications for OC were aneurysm expansion in 28 (64%), rupture in 12 (27%), and infection in four (9%). The endograft was preserved in situ in 10 patients (23%). Explantation was partial in 18 (41%) or complete in 16 (36%). Endograft preservation was used for type II endoleak in all but one patient by selective ligation of the culprit arteries (lumbar in four, inferior mesenteric artery in five, and middle sacral in one). Proximal neck banding was performed in one type Ia endoleak. Overall morbidity was 55%, and mortality was 18%. No deaths occurred in a subgroup of patients who underwent endograft preservation with selective ligation of culprit vessels for type II endoleak. Intraoperative complications included bowel injury in two, bleeding in two, splenectomy in one, and ureteral injury in one. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, two patients underwent additional procedures after the index OC: one after endograft preservation and one after partial explantation. None of the patients who underwent elective OC with endograft preservation required subsequent endograft explantation. Conclusions: Most OCs after EVAR are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, except when electively treating an isolated type II endoleak with ligation of branches and preservation of the endograft.

AB - Objective: Secondary interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remain a concern. Most are simple catheter-based procedures, but in some instances, open conversions (OCs) are required and carry a worse outcome. We reviewed our experience to characterize these OCs. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent an OC after a previous EVAR for an aneurysm-related indication from 2001 to 2010. Clinical outcomes are reported. Results: Data were reviewed for 44 patients (77% men) with a mean age of 74 years (range, 55-90 years). The average time from EVAR to the first OC was 45 months (range, 2-190 months). In six patients (14%), the initial EVAR was at another institution. The endografts used were Ancure in 16, Excluder in 13, AneuRx in eight, Zenith in three, Lifepath in one, Renu in one, and undetermined in two. Twenty-two patients had previously undergone a total of 32 endovascular reinterventions before their index OC. Indications for OC were aneurysm expansion in 28 (64%), rupture in 12 (27%), and infection in four (9%). The endograft was preserved in situ in 10 patients (23%). Explantation was partial in 18 (41%) or complete in 16 (36%). Endograft preservation was used for type II endoleak in all but one patient by selective ligation of the culprit arteries (lumbar in four, inferior mesenteric artery in five, and middle sacral in one). Proximal neck banding was performed in one type Ia endoleak. Overall morbidity was 55%, and mortality was 18%. No deaths occurred in a subgroup of patients who underwent endograft preservation with selective ligation of culprit vessels for type II endoleak. Intraoperative complications included bowel injury in two, bleeding in two, splenectomy in one, and ureteral injury in one. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, two patients underwent additional procedures after the index OC: one after endograft preservation and one after partial explantation. None of the patients who underwent elective OC with endograft preservation required subsequent endograft explantation. Conclusions: Most OCs after EVAR are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, except when electively treating an isolated type II endoleak with ligation of branches and preservation of the endograft.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861229053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861229053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22503183

AN - SCOPUS:84861229053

VL - 55

SP - 1562-1569.e1

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -