Deliberative policy-making and its limitations: the case of the Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens in South Korea

Da Kyoung Kim, Pan Suk Kim, Per Ola Öberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent criticism of representative liberal democracy has spurred democratic experiments involving citizen consultations in deliberative forums. However, more research is needed in order to understand the conditions necessary to make them work. The aim of this paper is to help mitigate this deficiency and at the same time contribute to an informed reflection over the specific conditions for deliberative democracy in Korea. The study focuses on a unique deliberative process organized in order to establish a Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens. Several lessons from this democratic experiment are discussed. While the process worked surprisingly well, its legitimacy was questioned because of controversies over the representativeness of participants and the involvement of external stakeholders. Although a complete consensus was not reached, initially disrespectful attitudes changed within the process to a situation where diverging positions were better acknowledged. How ideas of deliberation can be implemented in real-world public policy-making is discussed based on these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-69
Number of pages16
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 2

Fingerprint

charter
South Korea
human rights
citizen
deliberative democracy
experiment
deliberation
Korea
legitimacy
public policy
criticism
stakeholder
democracy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{e40bef57b4e94dbe86366b8b56e566bf,
title = "Deliberative policy-making and its limitations: the case of the Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens in South Korea",
abstract = "Recent criticism of representative liberal democracy has spurred democratic experiments involving citizen consultations in deliberative forums. However, more research is needed in order to understand the conditions necessary to make them work. The aim of this paper is to help mitigate this deficiency and at the same time contribute to an informed reflection over the specific conditions for deliberative democracy in Korea. The study focuses on a unique deliberative process organized in order to establish a Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens. Several lessons from this democratic experiment are discussed. While the process worked surprisingly well, its legitimacy was questioned because of controversies over the representativeness of participants and the involvement of external stakeholders. Although a complete consensus was not reached, initially disrespectful attitudes changed within the process to a situation where diverging positions were better acknowledged. How ideas of deliberation can be implemented in real-world public policy-making is discussed based on these findings.",
author = "Kim, {Da Kyoung} and Kim, {Pan Suk} and {\"O}berg, {Per Ola}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/01442872.2017.1410880",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "54--69",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Deliberative policy-making and its limitations : the case of the Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens in South Korea. / Kim, Da Kyoung; Kim, Pan Suk; Öberg, Per Ola.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 54-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deliberative policy-making and its limitations

T2 - the case of the Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens in South Korea

AU - Kim, Da Kyoung

AU - Kim, Pan Suk

AU - Öberg, Per Ola

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - Recent criticism of representative liberal democracy has spurred democratic experiments involving citizen consultations in deliberative forums. However, more research is needed in order to understand the conditions necessary to make them work. The aim of this paper is to help mitigate this deficiency and at the same time contribute to an informed reflection over the specific conditions for deliberative democracy in Korea. The study focuses on a unique deliberative process organized in order to establish a Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens. Several lessons from this democratic experiment are discussed. While the process worked surprisingly well, its legitimacy was questioned because of controversies over the representativeness of participants and the involvement of external stakeholders. Although a complete consensus was not reached, initially disrespectful attitudes changed within the process to a situation where diverging positions were better acknowledged. How ideas of deliberation can be implemented in real-world public policy-making is discussed based on these findings.

AB - Recent criticism of representative liberal democracy has spurred democratic experiments involving citizen consultations in deliberative forums. However, more research is needed in order to understand the conditions necessary to make them work. The aim of this paper is to help mitigate this deficiency and at the same time contribute to an informed reflection over the specific conditions for deliberative democracy in Korea. The study focuses on a unique deliberative process organized in order to establish a Charter of Human Rights for Seoul Citizens. Several lessons from this democratic experiment are discussed. While the process worked surprisingly well, its legitimacy was questioned because of controversies over the representativeness of participants and the involvement of external stakeholders. Although a complete consensus was not reached, initially disrespectful attitudes changed within the process to a situation where diverging positions were better acknowledged. How ideas of deliberation can be implemented in real-world public policy-making is discussed based on these findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037680504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037680504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2017.1410880

DO - 10.1080/01442872.2017.1410880

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037680504

VL - 39

SP - 54

EP - 69

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 1

ER -