Designing in virtual reality: a comparison of problem-solving styles between desktop and VR environments

Yan Jin, Sangwon Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With recent breakthroughs in VR devices, new potential of CAD as a design tool is anticipated. Based on the influence of design tools in ideation, we compared the problem-solving styles of WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer) and VRE (Virtual Reality Environment) for an apartment flat design task. Function-Behaviour-Structure ontology analysis revealed that WIMP was problem-driven with clear divisions between problem analysis and solution building, while VRE was predominantly solution-driven with frequent modifications of solutions. Such procedural characteristics led to uneven outcomes wherein spatial efficiency was better in WIMP while arrangement was more diversified in VRE. When the key factor was high manipulability of user interface in VRE, the result suggests that higher usability does not always produce desired outcomes. Time for problem analysis and a match between the tool and given problem must be taken into account.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-126
Number of pages20
JournalDigital Creativity
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Apr 3

Fingerprint

Virtual reality
User interfaces
Ontology
Computer aided design
Problem Solving
Virtual Reality
Icon

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Cite this

@article{0d2fe9d085ed43c5bf799881804c08f3,
title = "Designing in virtual reality: a comparison of problem-solving styles between desktop and VR environments",
abstract = "With recent breakthroughs in VR devices, new potential of CAD as a design tool is anticipated. Based on the influence of design tools in ideation, we compared the problem-solving styles of WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer) and VRE (Virtual Reality Environment) for an apartment flat design task. Function-Behaviour-Structure ontology analysis revealed that WIMP was problem-driven with clear divisions between problem analysis and solution building, while VRE was predominantly solution-driven with frequent modifications of solutions. Such procedural characteristics led to uneven outcomes wherein spatial efficiency was better in WIMP while arrangement was more diversified in VRE. When the key factor was high manipulability of user interface in VRE, the result suggests that higher usability does not always produce desired outcomes. Time for problem analysis and a match between the tool and given problem must be taken into account.",
author = "Yan Jin and Sangwon Lee",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14626268.2019.1608264",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "107--126",
journal = "Digital Creativity",
issn = "1462-6268",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Designing in virtual reality : a comparison of problem-solving styles between desktop and VR environments. / Jin, Yan; Lee, Sangwon.

In: Digital Creativity, Vol. 30, No. 2, 03.04.2019, p. 107-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Designing in virtual reality

T2 - a comparison of problem-solving styles between desktop and VR environments

AU - Jin, Yan

AU - Lee, Sangwon

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - With recent breakthroughs in VR devices, new potential of CAD as a design tool is anticipated. Based on the influence of design tools in ideation, we compared the problem-solving styles of WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer) and VRE (Virtual Reality Environment) for an apartment flat design task. Function-Behaviour-Structure ontology analysis revealed that WIMP was problem-driven with clear divisions between problem analysis and solution building, while VRE was predominantly solution-driven with frequent modifications of solutions. Such procedural characteristics led to uneven outcomes wherein spatial efficiency was better in WIMP while arrangement was more diversified in VRE. When the key factor was high manipulability of user interface in VRE, the result suggests that higher usability does not always produce desired outcomes. Time for problem analysis and a match between the tool and given problem must be taken into account.

AB - With recent breakthroughs in VR devices, new potential of CAD as a design tool is anticipated. Based on the influence of design tools in ideation, we compared the problem-solving styles of WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer) and VRE (Virtual Reality Environment) for an apartment flat design task. Function-Behaviour-Structure ontology analysis revealed that WIMP was problem-driven with clear divisions between problem analysis and solution building, while VRE was predominantly solution-driven with frequent modifications of solutions. Such procedural characteristics led to uneven outcomes wherein spatial efficiency was better in WIMP while arrangement was more diversified in VRE. When the key factor was high manipulability of user interface in VRE, the result suggests that higher usability does not always produce desired outcomes. Time for problem analysis and a match between the tool and given problem must be taken into account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065086449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065086449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14626268.2019.1608264

DO - 10.1080/14626268.2019.1608264

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065086449

VL - 30

SP - 107

EP - 126

JO - Digital Creativity

JF - Digital Creativity

SN - 1462-6268

IS - 2

ER -