Detection and Correction of Laterality Errors in Radiology Reports

Young Han Lee, Jaemoon Yang, Jinsuck Suh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of the study are to introduce the development of supervising software for double-checking of laterality error in radiology reports and to evaluate the usefulness of detection and correction software by applying it to radiology report systems. An AutoHotkey macro program was applied to the design for double-checking of laterality errors. The software was performed according to the flowchart below: (1) detecting laterality discrepancies between radiologic examination names and the context of the radiology report and (2) providing conditioned discrepancy correction with a pop-up window. The accuracy of the detection was evaluated with 300 radiologic examinations that include the intended discrepancies and concordance of lateralities. The number of detections and corrections were quantified, and the confidence intervals were calculated for accuracy. We also applied this module to previous radiology reports with laterality errors from the radiologic examination database to validate the module. The AutoHotkey-scripted macro program functioned well in the reading workstation, and it was acted successfully as additional software. The detection accuracy was 99.67 % (95 % CI; 99.01―%) in the 300 radiologic examinations from the radiologic reading session. There was one running failure, caused by a temporary lag in the hospital’s computer network, but no failures resulted during the second trial. We found that there were laterality errors in 0.048 % (n = 14/29,257) of the examinations from the database. We developed detection and correction software aimed at double-checking for laterality errors. This method can be successfully adopted in any hospital software and is expected to be included for a better radiologic reading environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)412-416
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Aug 26

Fingerprint

Radiology
Software
Reading
Macros
Databases
Computer workstations
Software Design
Computer networks
Computer systems
Names
Confidence Intervals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Lee, Young Han ; Yang, Jaemoon ; Suh, Jinsuck. / Detection and Correction of Laterality Errors in Radiology Reports. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 412-416.
@article{0ef4eee29dd44f4fb48b5dda1e8aff0d,
title = "Detection and Correction of Laterality Errors in Radiology Reports",
abstract = "The objectives of the study are to introduce the development of supervising software for double-checking of laterality error in radiology reports and to evaluate the usefulness of detection and correction software by applying it to radiology report systems. An AutoHotkey macro program was applied to the design for double-checking of laterality errors. The software was performed according to the flowchart below: (1) detecting laterality discrepancies between radiologic examination names and the context of the radiology report and (2) providing conditioned discrepancy correction with a pop-up window. The accuracy of the detection was evaluated with 300 radiologic examinations that include the intended discrepancies and concordance of lateralities. The number of detections and corrections were quantified, and the confidence intervals were calculated for accuracy. We also applied this module to previous radiology reports with laterality errors from the radiologic examination database to validate the module. The AutoHotkey-scripted macro program functioned well in the reading workstation, and it was acted successfully as additional software. The detection accuracy was 99.67 {\%} (95 {\%} CI; 99.01―{\%}) in the 300 radiologic examinations from the radiologic reading session. There was one running failure, caused by a temporary lag in the hospital’s computer network, but no failures resulted during the second trial. We found that there were laterality errors in 0.048 {\%} (n = 14/29,257) of the examinations from the database. We developed detection and correction software aimed at double-checking for laterality errors. This method can be successfully adopted in any hospital software and is expected to be included for a better radiologic reading environment.",
author = "Lee, {Young Han} and Jaemoon Yang and Jinsuck Suh",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-015-9772-x",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "412--416",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Detection and Correction of Laterality Errors in Radiology Reports. / Lee, Young Han; Yang, Jaemoon; Suh, Jinsuck.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, Vol. 28, No. 4, 26.08.2015, p. 412-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection and Correction of Laterality Errors in Radiology Reports

AU - Lee, Young Han

AU - Yang, Jaemoon

AU - Suh, Jinsuck

PY - 2015/8/26

Y1 - 2015/8/26

N2 - The objectives of the study are to introduce the development of supervising software for double-checking of laterality error in radiology reports and to evaluate the usefulness of detection and correction software by applying it to radiology report systems. An AutoHotkey macro program was applied to the design for double-checking of laterality errors. The software was performed according to the flowchart below: (1) detecting laterality discrepancies between radiologic examination names and the context of the radiology report and (2) providing conditioned discrepancy correction with a pop-up window. The accuracy of the detection was evaluated with 300 radiologic examinations that include the intended discrepancies and concordance of lateralities. The number of detections and corrections were quantified, and the confidence intervals were calculated for accuracy. We also applied this module to previous radiology reports with laterality errors from the radiologic examination database to validate the module. The AutoHotkey-scripted macro program functioned well in the reading workstation, and it was acted successfully as additional software. The detection accuracy was 99.67 % (95 % CI; 99.01―%) in the 300 radiologic examinations from the radiologic reading session. There was one running failure, caused by a temporary lag in the hospital’s computer network, but no failures resulted during the second trial. We found that there were laterality errors in 0.048 % (n = 14/29,257) of the examinations from the database. We developed detection and correction software aimed at double-checking for laterality errors. This method can be successfully adopted in any hospital software and is expected to be included for a better radiologic reading environment.

AB - The objectives of the study are to introduce the development of supervising software for double-checking of laterality error in radiology reports and to evaluate the usefulness of detection and correction software by applying it to radiology report systems. An AutoHotkey macro program was applied to the design for double-checking of laterality errors. The software was performed according to the flowchart below: (1) detecting laterality discrepancies between radiologic examination names and the context of the radiology report and (2) providing conditioned discrepancy correction with a pop-up window. The accuracy of the detection was evaluated with 300 radiologic examinations that include the intended discrepancies and concordance of lateralities. The number of detections and corrections were quantified, and the confidence intervals were calculated for accuracy. We also applied this module to previous radiology reports with laterality errors from the radiologic examination database to validate the module. The AutoHotkey-scripted macro program functioned well in the reading workstation, and it was acted successfully as additional software. The detection accuracy was 99.67 % (95 % CI; 99.01―%) in the 300 radiologic examinations from the radiologic reading session. There was one running failure, caused by a temporary lag in the hospital’s computer network, but no failures resulted during the second trial. We found that there were laterality errors in 0.048 % (n = 14/29,257) of the examinations from the database. We developed detection and correction software aimed at double-checking for laterality errors. This method can be successfully adopted in any hospital software and is expected to be included for a better radiologic reading environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937970665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937970665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-015-9772-x

DO - 10.1007/s10278-015-9772-x

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 412

EP - 416

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

IS - 4

ER -