Detection of biomarkers with graphene nanoplatelets and nanoribbons

Chee Shan Lim, Chun Kiang Chua, Martin Pumera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Well-defined graphene nanosheets have become increasingly popular in the electrochemical detection and quantification of small molecules. In this work, the electrochemical oxidation of biomarkers such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, dopamine, NADH and DNA bases, namely guanine and adenine, was performed using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry to compare the electrochemical properties of electrochemically reduced nanoplatelets (ENPs) and electrochemically reduced nanoribbons (ENRs). The graphene materials displayed better electrochemical performances than the bare glassy carbon surface. Between the two graphene materials, the oxidation of biomarkers occurred at lower oxidation potentials on the ENP surface. The sensitivities of the two graphene surfaces varied when different biomarkers were studied. The ENP surface showed enhanced sensitivities for ascorbic acid, while the ENR surface exhibited higher sensitivities for uric acid and dopamine. As for the DNA bases analysed, both guanine and adenine were oxidised at lower potentials on the ENP surface than the ENR surface. The ENP surface displayed a better sensitivity for guanine, whereas the oxidation of adenine was more sensitive on the ENR surface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1072-1080
Number of pages9
JournalAnalyst
Volume139
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Feb 3

Fingerprint

Nanoribbons
Carbon Nanotubes
Graphite
Biomarkers
Graphene
biomarker
Guanine
Adenine
Uric Acid
Ascorbic Acid
Dopamine
oxidation
DNA
Ascorbic acid
NAD
ascorbic acid
Oxidation
Carbon
detection
Acids

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy
  • Electrochemistry

Cite this

Lim, Chee Shan ; Chua, Chun Kiang ; Pumera, Martin. / Detection of biomarkers with graphene nanoplatelets and nanoribbons. In: Analyst. 2014 ; Vol. 139, No. 5. pp. 1072-1080.
@article{737bcf49b57e4d35a4892692dbe3acb4,
title = "Detection of biomarkers with graphene nanoplatelets and nanoribbons",
abstract = "Well-defined graphene nanosheets have become increasingly popular in the electrochemical detection and quantification of small molecules. In this work, the electrochemical oxidation of biomarkers such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, dopamine, NADH and DNA bases, namely guanine and adenine, was performed using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry to compare the electrochemical properties of electrochemically reduced nanoplatelets (ENPs) and electrochemically reduced nanoribbons (ENRs). The graphene materials displayed better electrochemical performances than the bare glassy carbon surface. Between the two graphene materials, the oxidation of biomarkers occurred at lower oxidation potentials on the ENP surface. The sensitivities of the two graphene surfaces varied when different biomarkers were studied. The ENP surface showed enhanced sensitivities for ascorbic acid, while the ENR surface exhibited higher sensitivities for uric acid and dopamine. As for the DNA bases analysed, both guanine and adenine were oxidised at lower potentials on the ENP surface than the ENR surface. The ENP surface displayed a better sensitivity for guanine, whereas the oxidation of adenine was more sensitive on the ENR surface.",
author = "Lim, {Chee Shan} and Chua, {Chun Kiang} and Martin Pumera",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1039/c3an01585h",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "1072--1080",
journal = "The Analyst",
issn = "0003-2654",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "5",

}

Detection of biomarkers with graphene nanoplatelets and nanoribbons. / Lim, Chee Shan; Chua, Chun Kiang; Pumera, Martin.

In: Analyst, Vol. 139, No. 5, 03.02.2014, p. 1072-1080.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of biomarkers with graphene nanoplatelets and nanoribbons

AU - Lim, Chee Shan

AU - Chua, Chun Kiang

AU - Pumera, Martin

PY - 2014/2/3

Y1 - 2014/2/3

N2 - Well-defined graphene nanosheets have become increasingly popular in the electrochemical detection and quantification of small molecules. In this work, the electrochemical oxidation of biomarkers such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, dopamine, NADH and DNA bases, namely guanine and adenine, was performed using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry to compare the electrochemical properties of electrochemically reduced nanoplatelets (ENPs) and electrochemically reduced nanoribbons (ENRs). The graphene materials displayed better electrochemical performances than the bare glassy carbon surface. Between the two graphene materials, the oxidation of biomarkers occurred at lower oxidation potentials on the ENP surface. The sensitivities of the two graphene surfaces varied when different biomarkers were studied. The ENP surface showed enhanced sensitivities for ascorbic acid, while the ENR surface exhibited higher sensitivities for uric acid and dopamine. As for the DNA bases analysed, both guanine and adenine were oxidised at lower potentials on the ENP surface than the ENR surface. The ENP surface displayed a better sensitivity for guanine, whereas the oxidation of adenine was more sensitive on the ENR surface.

AB - Well-defined graphene nanosheets have become increasingly popular in the electrochemical detection and quantification of small molecules. In this work, the electrochemical oxidation of biomarkers such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, dopamine, NADH and DNA bases, namely guanine and adenine, was performed using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry to compare the electrochemical properties of electrochemically reduced nanoplatelets (ENPs) and electrochemically reduced nanoribbons (ENRs). The graphene materials displayed better electrochemical performances than the bare glassy carbon surface. Between the two graphene materials, the oxidation of biomarkers occurred at lower oxidation potentials on the ENP surface. The sensitivities of the two graphene surfaces varied when different biomarkers were studied. The ENP surface showed enhanced sensitivities for ascorbic acid, while the ENR surface exhibited higher sensitivities for uric acid and dopamine. As for the DNA bases analysed, both guanine and adenine were oxidised at lower potentials on the ENP surface than the ENR surface. The ENP surface displayed a better sensitivity for guanine, whereas the oxidation of adenine was more sensitive on the ENR surface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893333865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893333865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c3an01585h

DO - 10.1039/c3an01585h

M3 - Article

C2 - 24400315

AN - SCOPUS:84893333865

VL - 139

SP - 1072

EP - 1080

JO - The Analyst

JF - The Analyst

SN - 0003-2654

IS - 5

ER -