Detection of the Tram Track Lesion in the Ankle Joint: Comparing 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy

Dong Woo Shim, Sungjun Kim, Yeokgu Hwang, Yunjae Lee, Jin Woo Lee, Seung Hwan Han

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To show the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of tram track lesions in the ankle compared with ankle arthroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle surgery between January 2013 and July 2015. Patients with anterior impingement spurs were included, but those with an osteochondral lesion or arthritis were excluded. Anterior ankle bony spurs on preoperative weight-bearing radiographs were scored using an impingement classification system. The 3.0-tesla MRIs were reviewed for tram track lesions (defined as focal high signal intensity along the talar dome cartilage surface on coronal views) and compared with arthroscopic findings. The cartilage defect grade at arthroscopy was stratified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. Results: Overall, 175 ankles in 170 patients were evaluated. Tram track lesions were identified on MRI in 14 ankles (8.0%) and at arthroscopy in 16 ankles (9.1%). The overall sensitivity of MRI for the detection of tram track lesions was 87.5% and the specificity was 100%. On plain weight-bearing radiographs, of the 16 patients with confirmed tram track lesions on arthroscopy, 4 patients had grade 1, 2 had grade 2, and 10 had grade 3 impingement spurs. Under the ICRS grading system, 4 patients had grade II, 4 had grade III, and 8 had grade IV cartilage defects at arthroscopy. On MRI, 2 patients had grade II (50% of arthroscopy), 4 had grade III (100% of arthroscopy), and 8 had grade IV defects (100% of arthroscopy). The impingement spur grade showed no significant correlation with the arthroscopic ICRS grade of the tram track lesion (P =.609). Conclusion: Tram track lesions can be confidently detected on MRI with high sensitivity and specificity. The impingement spur grade did not correlate with the severity of cartilage injury of the talar dome. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic evaluation study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-871
Number of pages6
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Mar

Fingerprint

Ankle Joint
Arthroscopy
Ankle
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cartilage
Weight-Bearing
Arthritis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wounds and Injuries

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{b49dc30f69bd485880353da434740a96,
title = "Detection of the Tram Track Lesion in the Ankle Joint: Comparing 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy",
abstract = "Purpose: To show the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of tram track lesions in the ankle compared with ankle arthroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle surgery between January 2013 and July 2015. Patients with anterior impingement spurs were included, but those with an osteochondral lesion or arthritis were excluded. Anterior ankle bony spurs on preoperative weight-bearing radiographs were scored using an impingement classification system. The 3.0-tesla MRIs were reviewed for tram track lesions (defined as focal high signal intensity along the talar dome cartilage surface on coronal views) and compared with arthroscopic findings. The cartilage defect grade at arthroscopy was stratified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. Results: Overall, 175 ankles in 170 patients were evaluated. Tram track lesions were identified on MRI in 14 ankles (8.0{\%}) and at arthroscopy in 16 ankles (9.1{\%}). The overall sensitivity of MRI for the detection of tram track lesions was 87.5{\%} and the specificity was 100{\%}. On plain weight-bearing radiographs, of the 16 patients with confirmed tram track lesions on arthroscopy, 4 patients had grade 1, 2 had grade 2, and 10 had grade 3 impingement spurs. Under the ICRS grading system, 4 patients had grade II, 4 had grade III, and 8 had grade IV cartilage defects at arthroscopy. On MRI, 2 patients had grade II (50{\%} of arthroscopy), 4 had grade III (100{\%} of arthroscopy), and 8 had grade IV defects (100{\%} of arthroscopy). The impingement spur grade showed no significant correlation with the arthroscopic ICRS grade of the tram track lesion (P =.609). Conclusion: Tram track lesions can be confidently detected on MRI with high sensitivity and specificity. The impingement spur grade did not correlate with the severity of cartilage injury of the talar dome. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic evaluation study.",
author = "Shim, {Dong Woo} and Sungjun Kim and Yeokgu Hwang and Yunjae Lee and Lee, {Jin Woo} and Han, {Seung Hwan}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.014",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "866--871",
journal = "Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery",
issn = "0749-8063",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Detection of the Tram Track Lesion in the Ankle Joint : Comparing 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy. / Shim, Dong Woo; Kim, Sungjun; Hwang, Yeokgu; Lee, Yunjae; Lee, Jin Woo; Han, Seung Hwan.

In: Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 3, 03.2018, p. 866-871.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of the Tram Track Lesion in the Ankle Joint

T2 - Comparing 3.0-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopy

AU - Shim, Dong Woo

AU - Kim, Sungjun

AU - Hwang, Yeokgu

AU - Lee, Yunjae

AU - Lee, Jin Woo

AU - Han, Seung Hwan

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Purpose: To show the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of tram track lesions in the ankle compared with ankle arthroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle surgery between January 2013 and July 2015. Patients with anterior impingement spurs were included, but those with an osteochondral lesion or arthritis were excluded. Anterior ankle bony spurs on preoperative weight-bearing radiographs were scored using an impingement classification system. The 3.0-tesla MRIs were reviewed for tram track lesions (defined as focal high signal intensity along the talar dome cartilage surface on coronal views) and compared with arthroscopic findings. The cartilage defect grade at arthroscopy was stratified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. Results: Overall, 175 ankles in 170 patients were evaluated. Tram track lesions were identified on MRI in 14 ankles (8.0%) and at arthroscopy in 16 ankles (9.1%). The overall sensitivity of MRI for the detection of tram track lesions was 87.5% and the specificity was 100%. On plain weight-bearing radiographs, of the 16 patients with confirmed tram track lesions on arthroscopy, 4 patients had grade 1, 2 had grade 2, and 10 had grade 3 impingement spurs. Under the ICRS grading system, 4 patients had grade II, 4 had grade III, and 8 had grade IV cartilage defects at arthroscopy. On MRI, 2 patients had grade II (50% of arthroscopy), 4 had grade III (100% of arthroscopy), and 8 had grade IV defects (100% of arthroscopy). The impingement spur grade showed no significant correlation with the arthroscopic ICRS grade of the tram track lesion (P =.609). Conclusion: Tram track lesions can be confidently detected on MRI with high sensitivity and specificity. The impingement spur grade did not correlate with the severity of cartilage injury of the talar dome. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic evaluation study.

AB - Purpose: To show the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of tram track lesions in the ankle compared with ankle arthroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle surgery between January 2013 and July 2015. Patients with anterior impingement spurs were included, but those with an osteochondral lesion or arthritis were excluded. Anterior ankle bony spurs on preoperative weight-bearing radiographs were scored using an impingement classification system. The 3.0-tesla MRIs were reviewed for tram track lesions (defined as focal high signal intensity along the talar dome cartilage surface on coronal views) and compared with arthroscopic findings. The cartilage defect grade at arthroscopy was stratified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system. Results: Overall, 175 ankles in 170 patients were evaluated. Tram track lesions were identified on MRI in 14 ankles (8.0%) and at arthroscopy in 16 ankles (9.1%). The overall sensitivity of MRI for the detection of tram track lesions was 87.5% and the specificity was 100%. On plain weight-bearing radiographs, of the 16 patients with confirmed tram track lesions on arthroscopy, 4 patients had grade 1, 2 had grade 2, and 10 had grade 3 impingement spurs. Under the ICRS grading system, 4 patients had grade II, 4 had grade III, and 8 had grade IV cartilage defects at arthroscopy. On MRI, 2 patients had grade II (50% of arthroscopy), 4 had grade III (100% of arthroscopy), and 8 had grade IV defects (100% of arthroscopy). The impingement spur grade showed no significant correlation with the arthroscopic ICRS grade of the tram track lesion (P =.609). Conclusion: Tram track lesions can be confidently detected on MRI with high sensitivity and specificity. The impingement spur grade did not correlate with the severity of cartilage injury of the talar dome. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic evaluation study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035047603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035047603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 29174207

AN - SCOPUS:85035047603

VL - 34

SP - 866

EP - 871

JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

SN - 0749-8063

IS - 3

ER -