Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system

Jangwoon Park, Wongi Hong, Jeongrim Jeong, Myungeun Lee, Youngjoo Chae, Minjoo Paik, Gilsoo Cho, Heecheon You

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the demand in the market for a product with a high sensibility has dramatically increased, research has been conducted in designing products for better sensibility; however, most studies have employed a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire in administering a sensibility evaluation, causing a lack of efficiency and systematicity in sensibility research. The present study developed a computerized textile sensibility evaluation system which can be used to efficiently evaluate the visual, tactile, visual-tactile, and auditory sensibilities of textiles and examined its effectiveness in visual sensibility evaluation compared with the traditional P&P evaluation method. The computerized evaluation system has capabilities of managing information of textile properties, designing a sensibility evaluation experiment, administering a sensibility evaluation, and managing evaluation data for post hoc analysis. The test-retest protocol was administered with a within-subject design for 15 females in their 20 s and 30 s to examine the difference in visual sensibility evaluation between the P&P method and the computer-based method. A high correlation (r=.88∼.97) was found in sensibility evaluation between the two methods and the computer-based system showed a higher repeatability within a rater in repeated evaluation (a decrease of 25 % in intra-rater SD), which indicates the computer-based method is an effective alternative to the P&P method in visual sensibility evaluation. The findings of the present study support use of a computerized system for practitioners to efficiently identify preferred characteristics of textiles for the design of sensible clothing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1400-1406
Number of pages7
JournalFibers and Polymers
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Textiles
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Polymers and Plastics

Cite this

Park, J., Hong, W., Jeong, J., Lee, M., Chae, Y., Paik, M., ... You, H. (2013). Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system. Fibers and Polymers, 14(8), 1400-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0
Park, Jangwoon ; Hong, Wongi ; Jeong, Jeongrim ; Lee, Myungeun ; Chae, Youngjoo ; Paik, Minjoo ; Cho, Gilsoo ; You, Heecheon. / Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system. In: Fibers and Polymers. 2013 ; Vol. 14, No. 8. pp. 1400-1406.
@article{57074bf8afe94687b6f10acf6f273f48,
title = "Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system",
abstract = "As the demand in the market for a product with a high sensibility has dramatically increased, research has been conducted in designing products for better sensibility; however, most studies have employed a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire in administering a sensibility evaluation, causing a lack of efficiency and systematicity in sensibility research. The present study developed a computerized textile sensibility evaluation system which can be used to efficiently evaluate the visual, tactile, visual-tactile, and auditory sensibilities of textiles and examined its effectiveness in visual sensibility evaluation compared with the traditional P&P evaluation method. The computerized evaluation system has capabilities of managing information of textile properties, designing a sensibility evaluation experiment, administering a sensibility evaluation, and managing evaluation data for post hoc analysis. The test-retest protocol was administered with a within-subject design for 15 females in their 20 s and 30 s to examine the difference in visual sensibility evaluation between the P&P method and the computer-based method. A high correlation (r=.88∼.97) was found in sensibility evaluation between the two methods and the computer-based system showed a higher repeatability within a rater in repeated evaluation (a decrease of 25 {\%} in intra-rater SD), which indicates the computer-based method is an effective alternative to the P&P method in visual sensibility evaluation. The findings of the present study support use of a computerized system for practitioners to efficiently identify preferred characteristics of textiles for the design of sensible clothing.",
author = "Jangwoon Park and Wongi Hong and Jeongrim Jeong and Myungeun Lee and Youngjoo Chae and Minjoo Paik and Gilsoo Cho and Heecheon You",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1400--1406",
journal = "Fibers and Polymers",
issn = "1229-9197",
publisher = "KOREAN FIBER SOCIETY",
number = "8",

}

Park, J, Hong, W, Jeong, J, Lee, M, Chae, Y, Paik, M, Cho, G & You, H 2013, 'Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system', Fibers and Polymers, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1400-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0

Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system. / Park, Jangwoon; Hong, Wongi; Jeong, Jeongrim; Lee, Myungeun; Chae, Youngjoo; Paik, Minjoo; Cho, Gilsoo; You, Heecheon.

In: Fibers and Polymers, Vol. 14, No. 8, 01.08.2013, p. 1400-1406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system

AU - Park, Jangwoon

AU - Hong, Wongi

AU - Jeong, Jeongrim

AU - Lee, Myungeun

AU - Chae, Youngjoo

AU - Paik, Minjoo

AU - Cho, Gilsoo

AU - You, Heecheon

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - As the demand in the market for a product with a high sensibility has dramatically increased, research has been conducted in designing products for better sensibility; however, most studies have employed a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire in administering a sensibility evaluation, causing a lack of efficiency and systematicity in sensibility research. The present study developed a computerized textile sensibility evaluation system which can be used to efficiently evaluate the visual, tactile, visual-tactile, and auditory sensibilities of textiles and examined its effectiveness in visual sensibility evaluation compared with the traditional P&P evaluation method. The computerized evaluation system has capabilities of managing information of textile properties, designing a sensibility evaluation experiment, administering a sensibility evaluation, and managing evaluation data for post hoc analysis. The test-retest protocol was administered with a within-subject design for 15 females in their 20 s and 30 s to examine the difference in visual sensibility evaluation between the P&P method and the computer-based method. A high correlation (r=.88∼.97) was found in sensibility evaluation between the two methods and the computer-based system showed a higher repeatability within a rater in repeated evaluation (a decrease of 25 % in intra-rater SD), which indicates the computer-based method is an effective alternative to the P&P method in visual sensibility evaluation. The findings of the present study support use of a computerized system for practitioners to efficiently identify preferred characteristics of textiles for the design of sensible clothing.

AB - As the demand in the market for a product with a high sensibility has dramatically increased, research has been conducted in designing products for better sensibility; however, most studies have employed a paper-and-pencil (P&P) questionnaire in administering a sensibility evaluation, causing a lack of efficiency and systematicity in sensibility research. The present study developed a computerized textile sensibility evaluation system which can be used to efficiently evaluate the visual, tactile, visual-tactile, and auditory sensibilities of textiles and examined its effectiveness in visual sensibility evaluation compared with the traditional P&P evaluation method. The computerized evaluation system has capabilities of managing information of textile properties, designing a sensibility evaluation experiment, administering a sensibility evaluation, and managing evaluation data for post hoc analysis. The test-retest protocol was administered with a within-subject design for 15 females in their 20 s and 30 s to examine the difference in visual sensibility evaluation between the P&P method and the computer-based method. A high correlation (r=.88∼.97) was found in sensibility evaluation between the two methods and the computer-based system showed a higher repeatability within a rater in repeated evaluation (a decrease of 25 % in intra-rater SD), which indicates the computer-based method is an effective alternative to the P&P method in visual sensibility evaluation. The findings of the present study support use of a computerized system for practitioners to efficiently identify preferred characteristics of textiles for the design of sensible clothing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883816886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883816886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0

DO - 10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883816886

VL - 14

SP - 1400

EP - 1406

JO - Fibers and Polymers

JF - Fibers and Polymers

SN - 1229-9197

IS - 8

ER -

Park J, Hong W, Jeong J, Lee M, Chae Y, Paik M et al. Development of a textile sensibility evaluation system. Fibers and Polymers. 2013 Aug 1;14(8):1400-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1400-0