Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED

Jaewook Jeong, Taehoon Hong, Changyoon Ji, Jimin Kim, Minhyun Lee, Kwangbok Jeong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to develop an evaluation process for comparing the energy performances of Green and non-Green buildings. The information on the building attributes and energy consumption of 455 multi-family housing complexes (MFHCs) in 2014, including 321 non-certified MFHCs and 126 MFHCs that accredited Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification (an official Green Building certification in South Korea) and 8 MFHCs that accredited Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) certification, were applied to the empirical study. Data-mining techniques are applied to develop the comparison groups considering various building attributes, and the database was classified into four groups based on the average enclosed area per household (AEA). It was shown that the large-AEA groups (i.e., Group 4, over 143.47 m2) had less energy use intensity (EUI) than the small-AEA groups (i.e., Group 1, under 97.04 m2). The mean of site EUI for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were significantly different (125.29, 116.35, 110.89, and 101.00 kWh/m2y, respectively). While the G-SEED- and LEED-certified MFHCs were considered to have up to 10 and 15% energy savings, respectively, compared to all non-certified MFHCs, the comparative analysis by the developed Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 revealed that the G-SEED-certified MFHCs and the non-certified MFHCs had no significant differences in energy performance. Therefore, the energy performance rating system of G-SEED should be revised. The proposed energy performance evaluation process can also be useful in identifying the energy performance of other buildings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-184
Number of pages13
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume105
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 15

Fingerprint

environmental design
leadership
building
energy
evaluation
housing
performance
certification
Group
energy use
environmental development
Environmental design
Data mining
family
data mining
Energy conservation
Energy utilization
energy saving
energy consumption
South Korea

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Jeong, Jaewook ; Hong, Taehoon ; Ji, Changyoon ; Kim, Jimin ; Lee, Minhyun ; Jeong, Kwangbok. / Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED. In: Building and Environment. 2016 ; Vol. 105. pp. 172-184.
@article{8674b0b2b5624870ad2199baa2d03882,
title = "Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED",
abstract = "This study aims to develop an evaluation process for comparing the energy performances of Green and non-Green buildings. The information on the building attributes and energy consumption of 455 multi-family housing complexes (MFHCs) in 2014, including 321 non-certified MFHCs and 126 MFHCs that accredited Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification (an official Green Building certification in South Korea) and 8 MFHCs that accredited Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) certification, were applied to the empirical study. Data-mining techniques are applied to develop the comparison groups considering various building attributes, and the database was classified into four groups based on the average enclosed area per household (AEA). It was shown that the large-AEA groups (i.e., Group 4, over 143.47 m2) had less energy use intensity (EUI) than the small-AEA groups (i.e., Group 1, under 97.04 m2). The mean of site EUI for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were significantly different (125.29, 116.35, 110.89, and 101.00 kWh/m2y, respectively). While the G-SEED- and LEED-certified MFHCs were considered to have up to 10 and 15{\%} energy savings, respectively, compared to all non-certified MFHCs, the comparative analysis by the developed Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 revealed that the G-SEED-certified MFHCs and the non-certified MFHCs had no significant differences in energy performance. Therefore, the energy performance rating system of G-SEED should be revised. The proposed energy performance evaluation process can also be useful in identifying the energy performance of other buildings.",
author = "Jaewook Jeong and Taehoon Hong and Changyoon Ji and Jimin Kim and Minhyun Lee and Kwangbok Jeong",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.041",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "172--184",
journal = "Building and Environment",
issn = "0360-1323",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED. / Jeong, Jaewook; Hong, Taehoon; Ji, Changyoon; Kim, Jimin; Lee, Minhyun; Jeong, Kwangbok.

In: Building and Environment, Vol. 105, 15.08.2016, p. 172-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an evaluation process for green and non-green buildings focused on energy performance of G-SEED and LEED

AU - Jeong, Jaewook

AU - Hong, Taehoon

AU - Ji, Changyoon

AU - Kim, Jimin

AU - Lee, Minhyun

AU - Jeong, Kwangbok

PY - 2016/8/15

Y1 - 2016/8/15

N2 - This study aims to develop an evaluation process for comparing the energy performances of Green and non-Green buildings. The information on the building attributes and energy consumption of 455 multi-family housing complexes (MFHCs) in 2014, including 321 non-certified MFHCs and 126 MFHCs that accredited Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification (an official Green Building certification in South Korea) and 8 MFHCs that accredited Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) certification, were applied to the empirical study. Data-mining techniques are applied to develop the comparison groups considering various building attributes, and the database was classified into four groups based on the average enclosed area per household (AEA). It was shown that the large-AEA groups (i.e., Group 4, over 143.47 m2) had less energy use intensity (EUI) than the small-AEA groups (i.e., Group 1, under 97.04 m2). The mean of site EUI for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were significantly different (125.29, 116.35, 110.89, and 101.00 kWh/m2y, respectively). While the G-SEED- and LEED-certified MFHCs were considered to have up to 10 and 15% energy savings, respectively, compared to all non-certified MFHCs, the comparative analysis by the developed Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 revealed that the G-SEED-certified MFHCs and the non-certified MFHCs had no significant differences in energy performance. Therefore, the energy performance rating system of G-SEED should be revised. The proposed energy performance evaluation process can also be useful in identifying the energy performance of other buildings.

AB - This study aims to develop an evaluation process for comparing the energy performances of Green and non-Green buildings. The information on the building attributes and energy consumption of 455 multi-family housing complexes (MFHCs) in 2014, including 321 non-certified MFHCs and 126 MFHCs that accredited Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) certification (an official Green Building certification in South Korea) and 8 MFHCs that accredited Leadership in Energy and Environmental Development (LEED) certification, were applied to the empirical study. Data-mining techniques are applied to develop the comparison groups considering various building attributes, and the database was classified into four groups based on the average enclosed area per household (AEA). It was shown that the large-AEA groups (i.e., Group 4, over 143.47 m2) had less energy use intensity (EUI) than the small-AEA groups (i.e., Group 1, under 97.04 m2). The mean of site EUI for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were significantly different (125.29, 116.35, 110.89, and 101.00 kWh/m2y, respectively). While the G-SEED- and LEED-certified MFHCs were considered to have up to 10 and 15% energy savings, respectively, compared to all non-certified MFHCs, the comparative analysis by the developed Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 revealed that the G-SEED-certified MFHCs and the non-certified MFHCs had no significant differences in energy performance. Therefore, the energy performance rating system of G-SEED should be revised. The proposed energy performance evaluation process can also be useful in identifying the energy performance of other buildings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971637052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971637052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.041

DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84971637052

VL - 105

SP - 172

EP - 184

JO - Building and Environment

JF - Building and Environment

SN - 0360-1323

ER -