Abstract
Objectives: The accuracies of biomarkers checked in the hepatic vein (HV) and peripheral vein (PV) were compared in the prediction of advanced fibrosis (AF) of liver. Methods: Patients with chronic viral hepatitis (n = 101) who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient, liver biopsy, and paired HV-PV samples (6 biomarkers: hyaluronic acid [HA], haptoglobin, matrix metalloproteinase-2 [MMP2], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 [TIMP1], procollagen III N-terminal peptide [PIIINP], and apolipoprotein-A1 [Apo-A1]) were enrolled. Results: Differences were displayed between the HV and PV in the predictive logit-models for predicting AF (- 3.13 + 0.017 × MMP2. - 0.019 × haptoglobin and - 0.270 + 0.007 × HA. - 0.018 × haptoglobin, respectively). In the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, PIIINP (0.74/0.68, p= 0.03), MMP2 (0.72/0.63, p= 0.04), HA (0.79/0.76, p= 0.94), Apo-A1 (0.56/0.48, p= 0.73), and predictive logit-model (0.81/0.78, p= 0.68) showed higher diagnostic value in the HV sample. Conclusions: While most biomarkers were correlated better with hepatic fibrosis in HV than in PV, individually and in predictive logit-models, they were inadequate to determine the degree of advanced fibrosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1075-1080 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Clinical Biochemistry |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 13-14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 Sep 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Clinical Biochemistry
Cite this
}
Diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers measured in the hepatic vein and peripheral vein in the prediction of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. / Suk, Ki Tae; Kim, Dong Joon; Kim, Chang Hoon; Park, Seung Ha; Cheong, Jae Youn; Cho, Sung Won; Choi, Jong Young; Han, Kwang Hyub; Sung, Ho Taik; Hong, So Hyung; Kim, Dae Yong; Yoon, Jai Hoon; Kim, Yeon Soo; Baik, Gwang Ho; Kim, Jin Bong.
In: Clinical Biochemistry, Vol. 45, No. 13-14, 01.09.2012, p. 1075-1080.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers measured in the hepatic vein and peripheral vein in the prediction of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis
AU - Suk, Ki Tae
AU - Kim, Dong Joon
AU - Kim, Chang Hoon
AU - Park, Seung Ha
AU - Cheong, Jae Youn
AU - Cho, Sung Won
AU - Choi, Jong Young
AU - Han, Kwang Hyub
AU - Sung, Ho Taik
AU - Hong, So Hyung
AU - Kim, Dae Yong
AU - Yoon, Jai Hoon
AU - Kim, Yeon Soo
AU - Baik, Gwang Ho
AU - Kim, Jin Bong
PY - 2012/9/1
Y1 - 2012/9/1
N2 - Objectives: The accuracies of biomarkers checked in the hepatic vein (HV) and peripheral vein (PV) were compared in the prediction of advanced fibrosis (AF) of liver. Methods: Patients with chronic viral hepatitis (n = 101) who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient, liver biopsy, and paired HV-PV samples (6 biomarkers: hyaluronic acid [HA], haptoglobin, matrix metalloproteinase-2 [MMP2], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 [TIMP1], procollagen III N-terminal peptide [PIIINP], and apolipoprotein-A1 [Apo-A1]) were enrolled. Results: Differences were displayed between the HV and PV in the predictive logit-models for predicting AF (- 3.13 + 0.017 × MMP2. - 0.019 × haptoglobin and - 0.270 + 0.007 × HA. - 0.018 × haptoglobin, respectively). In the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, PIIINP (0.74/0.68, p= 0.03), MMP2 (0.72/0.63, p= 0.04), HA (0.79/0.76, p= 0.94), Apo-A1 (0.56/0.48, p= 0.73), and predictive logit-model (0.81/0.78, p= 0.68) showed higher diagnostic value in the HV sample. Conclusions: While most biomarkers were correlated better with hepatic fibrosis in HV than in PV, individually and in predictive logit-models, they were inadequate to determine the degree of advanced fibrosis.
AB - Objectives: The accuracies of biomarkers checked in the hepatic vein (HV) and peripheral vein (PV) were compared in the prediction of advanced fibrosis (AF) of liver. Methods: Patients with chronic viral hepatitis (n = 101) who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient, liver biopsy, and paired HV-PV samples (6 biomarkers: hyaluronic acid [HA], haptoglobin, matrix metalloproteinase-2 [MMP2], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 [TIMP1], procollagen III N-terminal peptide [PIIINP], and apolipoprotein-A1 [Apo-A1]) were enrolled. Results: Differences were displayed between the HV and PV in the predictive logit-models for predicting AF (- 3.13 + 0.017 × MMP2. - 0.019 × haptoglobin and - 0.270 + 0.007 × HA. - 0.018 × haptoglobin, respectively). In the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, PIIINP (0.74/0.68, p= 0.03), MMP2 (0.72/0.63, p= 0.04), HA (0.79/0.76, p= 0.94), Apo-A1 (0.56/0.48, p= 0.73), and predictive logit-model (0.81/0.78, p= 0.68) showed higher diagnostic value in the HV sample. Conclusions: While most biomarkers were correlated better with hepatic fibrosis in HV than in PV, individually and in predictive logit-models, they were inadequate to determine the degree of advanced fibrosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866024116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866024116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.04.031
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.04.031
M3 - Article
C2 - 22579966
AN - SCOPUS:84866024116
VL - 45
SP - 1075
EP - 1080
JO - Clinical Biochemistry
JF - Clinical Biochemistry
SN - 0009-9120
IS - 13-14
ER -