Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma

Pil Woo Huh, Do Sung Yoo, Kyung Suok Cho, Chun Kun Park, Seok Gu Kang, Young Sup Park, Dal Soo Kim, Moon Chan Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The various terms used to describe subdural fluid collection - "external hydrocephalus," "subdural hygroma," "subdural effusion," "benign subdural collection," and "extraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus" - reflect the confusion surrounding the diagnoses of these diseases. Differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma may be difficult, but the former appears to be a distinct clinical entity separate from the latter. In this report, the authors present a diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma, based on their clinical experience in treating subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma. Methods. Twenty patients with subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma were included in this study. Ventricle size was measured using a modified frontal horn index (mFHI); that is, the largest width of the frontal horns divided by the bicortical distance in the same plane, instead of the inner table distance. Bur hole trephination was performed on the appearance of a subdural fluid collection thicker than 15 mm on computed tomography (CT), persistent (longer than 4 weeks) or increasing in size, and accompanied by neurological symptoms (confusion or memory impairment). During the procedure, subdural pressure was measured using a manometer before opening the dura mater. Subdural pressure varied among the patients, ranging from 3 to 27.5 cm H2O. Four patients with a subdural pressure greater than 15 cm H2O had hydrocephalus after surgery (p < 0.05). Hydrocephalus developed in a pediatric patient (2 years old) with a subdural pressure of 12 cm H 2O. All of the patients in whom hydrocephalus developed after bur hole trephination had had enlarged ventricles (mFHI ≥ 33%) on preoperative CT scans. Conclusions. Monitoring subdural pressure may be a valuable tool for differentiating subdural hygroma from external hydrocephalus in patients with mild head trauma. Additionally, the mFHI reflects the nature of the subdural collection more accurately than the standard frontal horn index.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of neurosurgery
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jul 7

Fingerprint

Subdural Effusion
Hydrocephalus
Horns
Pressure
Craniocerebral Trauma
Trephining
Tomography
Dura Mater
Confusion
Pediatrics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Huh, Pil Woo ; Yoo, Do Sung ; Cho, Kyung Suok ; Park, Chun Kun ; Kang, Seok Gu ; Park, Young Sup ; Kim, Dal Soo ; Kim, Moon Chan. / Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma. In: Journal of neurosurgery. 2006 ; Vol. 105, No. 1. pp. 65-70.
@article{2f40122327c2425cb15e5df877237db4,
title = "Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma",
abstract = "Object. The various terms used to describe subdural fluid collection - {"}external hydrocephalus,{"} {"}subdural hygroma,{"} {"}subdural effusion,{"} {"}benign subdural collection,{"} and {"}extraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus{"} - reflect the confusion surrounding the diagnoses of these diseases. Differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma may be difficult, but the former appears to be a distinct clinical entity separate from the latter. In this report, the authors present a diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma, based on their clinical experience in treating subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma. Methods. Twenty patients with subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma were included in this study. Ventricle size was measured using a modified frontal horn index (mFHI); that is, the largest width of the frontal horns divided by the bicortical distance in the same plane, instead of the inner table distance. Bur hole trephination was performed on the appearance of a subdural fluid collection thicker than 15 mm on computed tomography (CT), persistent (longer than 4 weeks) or increasing in size, and accompanied by neurological symptoms (confusion or memory impairment). During the procedure, subdural pressure was measured using a manometer before opening the dura mater. Subdural pressure varied among the patients, ranging from 3 to 27.5 cm H2O. Four patients with a subdural pressure greater than 15 cm H2O had hydrocephalus after surgery (p < 0.05). Hydrocephalus developed in a pediatric patient (2 years old) with a subdural pressure of 12 cm H 2O. All of the patients in whom hydrocephalus developed after bur hole trephination had had enlarged ventricles (mFHI ≥ 33{\%}) on preoperative CT scans. Conclusions. Monitoring subdural pressure may be a valuable tool for differentiating subdural hygroma from external hydrocephalus in patients with mild head trauma. Additionally, the mFHI reflects the nature of the subdural collection more accurately than the standard frontal horn index.",
author = "Huh, {Pil Woo} and Yoo, {Do Sung} and Cho, {Kyung Suok} and Park, {Chun Kun} and Kang, {Seok Gu} and Park, {Young Sup} and Kim, {Dal Soo} and Kim, {Moon Chan}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "7",
doi = "10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.65",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma. / Huh, Pil Woo; Yoo, Do Sung; Cho, Kyung Suok; Park, Chun Kun; Kang, Seok Gu; Park, Young Sup; Kim, Dal Soo; Kim, Moon Chan.

In: Journal of neurosurgery, Vol. 105, No. 1, 07.07.2006, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma

AU - Huh, Pil Woo

AU - Yoo, Do Sung

AU - Cho, Kyung Suok

AU - Park, Chun Kun

AU - Kang, Seok Gu

AU - Park, Young Sup

AU - Kim, Dal Soo

AU - Kim, Moon Chan

PY - 2006/7/7

Y1 - 2006/7/7

N2 - Object. The various terms used to describe subdural fluid collection - "external hydrocephalus," "subdural hygroma," "subdural effusion," "benign subdural collection," and "extraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus" - reflect the confusion surrounding the diagnoses of these diseases. Differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma may be difficult, but the former appears to be a distinct clinical entity separate from the latter. In this report, the authors present a diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma, based on their clinical experience in treating subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma. Methods. Twenty patients with subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma were included in this study. Ventricle size was measured using a modified frontal horn index (mFHI); that is, the largest width of the frontal horns divided by the bicortical distance in the same plane, instead of the inner table distance. Bur hole trephination was performed on the appearance of a subdural fluid collection thicker than 15 mm on computed tomography (CT), persistent (longer than 4 weeks) or increasing in size, and accompanied by neurological symptoms (confusion or memory impairment). During the procedure, subdural pressure was measured using a manometer before opening the dura mater. Subdural pressure varied among the patients, ranging from 3 to 27.5 cm H2O. Four patients with a subdural pressure greater than 15 cm H2O had hydrocephalus after surgery (p < 0.05). Hydrocephalus developed in a pediatric patient (2 years old) with a subdural pressure of 12 cm H 2O. All of the patients in whom hydrocephalus developed after bur hole trephination had had enlarged ventricles (mFHI ≥ 33%) on preoperative CT scans. Conclusions. Monitoring subdural pressure may be a valuable tool for differentiating subdural hygroma from external hydrocephalus in patients with mild head trauma. Additionally, the mFHI reflects the nature of the subdural collection more accurately than the standard frontal horn index.

AB - Object. The various terms used to describe subdural fluid collection - "external hydrocephalus," "subdural hygroma," "subdural effusion," "benign subdural collection," and "extraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus" - reflect the confusion surrounding the diagnoses of these diseases. Differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma may be difficult, but the former appears to be a distinct clinical entity separate from the latter. In this report, the authors present a diagnostic method for differentiating external hydrocephalus from simple subdural hygroma, based on their clinical experience in treating subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma. Methods. Twenty patients with subdural fluid collection after mild head trauma were included in this study. Ventricle size was measured using a modified frontal horn index (mFHI); that is, the largest width of the frontal horns divided by the bicortical distance in the same plane, instead of the inner table distance. Bur hole trephination was performed on the appearance of a subdural fluid collection thicker than 15 mm on computed tomography (CT), persistent (longer than 4 weeks) or increasing in size, and accompanied by neurological symptoms (confusion or memory impairment). During the procedure, subdural pressure was measured using a manometer before opening the dura mater. Subdural pressure varied among the patients, ranging from 3 to 27.5 cm H2O. Four patients with a subdural pressure greater than 15 cm H2O had hydrocephalus after surgery (p < 0.05). Hydrocephalus developed in a pediatric patient (2 years old) with a subdural pressure of 12 cm H 2O. All of the patients in whom hydrocephalus developed after bur hole trephination had had enlarged ventricles (mFHI ≥ 33%) on preoperative CT scans. Conclusions. Monitoring subdural pressure may be a valuable tool for differentiating subdural hygroma from external hydrocephalus in patients with mild head trauma. Additionally, the mFHI reflects the nature of the subdural collection more accurately than the standard frontal horn index.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745516925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745516925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.65

DO - 10.3171/jns.2006.105.1.65

M3 - Article

C2 - 16874890

AN - SCOPUS:33745516925

VL - 105

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 1

ER -