Different bone regeneration patterns in periimplant circumferential gap defects grafted with two types of osteoconductive biomaterial

Jung Seok Lee, Joo Yeon Sohn, Hyun Chang Lim, Ui-Won Jung, Seongho Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine healing patterns in periimplant gap defect grafted with demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and porous titanium granules (PTG), which are known to induce a minimal tissue reaction and to undergo minimal biodegradation in healing process. Experiments were performed using a standardized periimplant gap-defect model in dogs with two observational periods: 4 and 8 weeks. Circumferential defects were surgically induced around dental implants on unilateral mandibles in five dogs, and collagen barrier membranes were placed over the DBBM and PTG grafts at two experimental sites and over a nongrafted site. Four weeks later, the same procedures were performed on the contralateral mandible, and the animals allowed to heal for a further 4 weeks, after which they were sacrificed and their mandibles with graft/control sites harvested for histologic evaluation. Both types of grafted biomaterials significantly enhanced the defect fill with newly formed bone, but the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly increased only at sites that had been grafted with DBBM. The two experimental sites exhibited different healing patterns, with new bone formation being observed on the surface of the DBBM particles throughout the defect, while there was no de novo bone formation on the PTG surface, but rather appositional bone growth from the base and lateral walls of the defect. It has been suggested that gap-defect filling with DBBM around dental implants may enhance both BIC and defect fill; however, the present findings show that defect grafting with PTG enhances only defect fill and not BIC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1202-1209
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Biocompatible Materials
Biomaterials
Bone
Defects
Minerals
Titanium
Dental prostheses
Grafts
Biodegradation
Collagen
Animals
Tissue
Membranes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomaterials
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

@article{d96af05e72bc44d284c6f65f55843da2,
title = "Different bone regeneration patterns in periimplant circumferential gap defects grafted with two types of osteoconductive biomaterial",
abstract = "This study aimed to determine healing patterns in periimplant gap defect grafted with demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and porous titanium granules (PTG), which are known to induce a minimal tissue reaction and to undergo minimal biodegradation in healing process. Experiments were performed using a standardized periimplant gap-defect model in dogs with two observational periods: 4 and 8 weeks. Circumferential defects were surgically induced around dental implants on unilateral mandibles in five dogs, and collagen barrier membranes were placed over the DBBM and PTG grafts at two experimental sites and over a nongrafted site. Four weeks later, the same procedures were performed on the contralateral mandible, and the animals allowed to heal for a further 4 weeks, after which they were sacrificed and their mandibles with graft/control sites harvested for histologic evaluation. Both types of grafted biomaterials significantly enhanced the defect fill with newly formed bone, but the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly increased only at sites that had been grafted with DBBM. The two experimental sites exhibited different healing patterns, with new bone formation being observed on the surface of the DBBM particles throughout the defect, while there was no de novo bone formation on the PTG surface, but rather appositional bone growth from the base and lateral walls of the defect. It has been suggested that gap-defect filling with DBBM around dental implants may enhance both BIC and defect fill; however, the present findings show that defect grafting with PTG enhances only defect fill and not BIC.",
author = "Lee, {Jung Seok} and Sohn, {Joo Yeon} and Lim, {Hyun Chang} and Ui-Won Jung and Seongho Choi",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jbm.b.33433",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "1202--1209",
journal = "Journal of Biomedical Materials Research",
issn = "1552-4973",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different bone regeneration patterns in periimplant circumferential gap defects grafted with two types of osteoconductive biomaterial

AU - Lee, Jung Seok

AU - Sohn, Joo Yeon

AU - Lim, Hyun Chang

AU - Jung, Ui-Won

AU - Choi, Seongho

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - This study aimed to determine healing patterns in periimplant gap defect grafted with demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and porous titanium granules (PTG), which are known to induce a minimal tissue reaction and to undergo minimal biodegradation in healing process. Experiments were performed using a standardized periimplant gap-defect model in dogs with two observational periods: 4 and 8 weeks. Circumferential defects were surgically induced around dental implants on unilateral mandibles in five dogs, and collagen barrier membranes were placed over the DBBM and PTG grafts at two experimental sites and over a nongrafted site. Four weeks later, the same procedures were performed on the contralateral mandible, and the animals allowed to heal for a further 4 weeks, after which they were sacrificed and their mandibles with graft/control sites harvested for histologic evaluation. Both types of grafted biomaterials significantly enhanced the defect fill with newly formed bone, but the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly increased only at sites that had been grafted with DBBM. The two experimental sites exhibited different healing patterns, with new bone formation being observed on the surface of the DBBM particles throughout the defect, while there was no de novo bone formation on the PTG surface, but rather appositional bone growth from the base and lateral walls of the defect. It has been suggested that gap-defect filling with DBBM around dental implants may enhance both BIC and defect fill; however, the present findings show that defect grafting with PTG enhances only defect fill and not BIC.

AB - This study aimed to determine healing patterns in periimplant gap defect grafted with demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and porous titanium granules (PTG), which are known to induce a minimal tissue reaction and to undergo minimal biodegradation in healing process. Experiments were performed using a standardized periimplant gap-defect model in dogs with two observational periods: 4 and 8 weeks. Circumferential defects were surgically induced around dental implants on unilateral mandibles in five dogs, and collagen barrier membranes were placed over the DBBM and PTG grafts at two experimental sites and over a nongrafted site. Four weeks later, the same procedures were performed on the contralateral mandible, and the animals allowed to heal for a further 4 weeks, after which they were sacrificed and their mandibles with graft/control sites harvested for histologic evaluation. Both types of grafted biomaterials significantly enhanced the defect fill with newly formed bone, but the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly increased only at sites that had been grafted with DBBM. The two experimental sites exhibited different healing patterns, with new bone formation being observed on the surface of the DBBM particles throughout the defect, while there was no de novo bone formation on the PTG surface, but rather appositional bone growth from the base and lateral walls of the defect. It has been suggested that gap-defect filling with DBBM around dental implants may enhance both BIC and defect fill; however, the present findings show that defect grafting with PTG enhances only defect fill and not BIC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978743846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978743846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jbm.b.33433

DO - 10.1002/jbm.b.33433

M3 - Article

C2 - 26087247

AN - SCOPUS:84978743846

VL - 104

SP - 1202

EP - 1209

JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

SN - 1552-4973

IS - 6

ER -